Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

3.18s

  • New World Life Ins. Co. v. United States

    26 F. Supp. 444 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1939

    Helvering v. … The decisions of the United States Board of Tax Appeals in Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 33 B.T.A. 708 ; Monarch Life Insurance Company v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Superior Pine Products Co. v. United States

    201 Ct. Cl. 455 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1973

    Plaintiff sold on a stumpage basis 2,311,070 and 5,903,744 board feet of timber respectively in 1946 and 1947. … Palmer v. Bender, 287 U.S. 551 (1933); Crosby v. United States, 414 F. 2d 822, 825 (5th Cir. 1969); Dyal v. United States, supra; Boeing v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 9, 28 , 98 F. Supp. 581, 585 (1951) ; Huxford v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Texas City Terminal Railway Co. v. United States

    152 F. Supp. 227 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

    S. 462 , and Le Tulle v. Scofield, 308 U. S. 415 . In support of its position plaintiff cites Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Company, 315 U. … Helvering v. New Haven & S. L. R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Snyder-Lynch Motors, Inc. v. United States

    154 Ct. Cl. 476 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

    Ragonese, et al. v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 156 ; Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 387 . Plaintiff’s unrecovered indirect costs of procuring the tank engine parts was $87,587.06. … The General Provisions of Contract Ord-242 are contained under Title V and provide in part: V-A General Provisions The General Provisions hereinafter set forth are included in and made a part of this contract.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fern v. United States

    15 Cl. Ct. 580 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 6, 1988

    See Thomas v. … Further, the decision in Railroad Retirement Board v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Faith Hospital Ass'n v. United States

    634 F.2d 526 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1980

    McDonald Foundation, Inc. v. United States, No. 270-78, 'post at 592. See also Lodi Memorial Hospital v. Califano, 451 F. Supp. 651 (D. D.C. 1978). But see Vallejo General Hospital v. … Himmler v. Califano, 611 F.2d 137,140 (6th Cir. 1979) citing Martinez v. Richardson, 472 F.2d 1121, 1123 (10th Cir. 1973).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gardner Machinery Corp. v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,441 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1988

    See, e.g., Technassociates, Inc. v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 200 (1988); Aeronetics Division, AAR Brooks & Perkins Corp. v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 132 (1987); Hoffman Construction Co. v. … See Technassociates v. United States, supra; Hoffman v. United States, supra. See also ReCon Paving, Inc. v. United States, 745 F.2d 34 (Fed.Cir.1984); Straga v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 61 (1985). Accord J.M.T.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Metzger ex rel. Metzger v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    22 Cl. Ct. 123 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1990

    Helen Woodard, a Board certified vocational expert and rehabilitation specialist. … Watt v. Alaska, 451 U.S. 259, 265 , 101 S.Ct. 1673, 1677 , 68 L.Ed.2d 80 (1981) (quoting Blue Chip Stamps v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kalvar Corp. v. United States

    587 F.2d 49 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1978

    John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 381 , 325 F.2d 438 (1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 931 (1964). … The following opinions all speak to fees or invoiced charges: Acme Process Equipment Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Price v. United States

    100 F. Supp. 310 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1951

    The Militia Bureau 1 was established by the act of 1916; it replaced the' National Militia Board created by the 1908 act. … Selective Draft Law Cases, (Arver v. U. S.), 245 U.S. 366 , 38 S.Ct. 159 , 62 L.Ed. 349 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sperry Rand Corp. v. United States

    475 F.2d 1168 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1973

    After lengthy trial, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denied on the merits plaintiff’s claim for “recoupment of R&D costs allocated to * * *” subsequent contracts (Count *172 II), and plaintiff’s claim of right … National Presto Indus., Inc. v. United States, 175 Ct Cl. 881 (1966). Cf. R.E.D.M. Corp. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 891, 901-02 , 428 F. 2d 1304, 1309-10 (1970) ; J. L. Simmons Co. v. United States, 188 Ct.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Croskey v. United States

    24 Cl. Ct. 420 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 9, 1991

    When ruling on a motion to amend, this court in both Effingham County Board of Education v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 177 (1985), and State of Alaska v. … Rivera v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Transtechnology Corp. v. United States

    36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,953 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 12, 1990

    Simmons v. … Brown’s work papers recorded that 178,000 flares were rejected before the environmental shutdown in 1985.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Fs Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Illinois Farm Supply Company, an Illinois Corporation v. The United States

    413 F.2d 548 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

    For example, in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … See also Journal Co. v. United States, 195 F.Supp. 434 (E.D.Wis.1961); Mansfield Journal Co. v. Commissioner, 274 F.2d 284 (6th Cir. 1960); Byerlite Corp. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ragonese & Scaravelli v. United States

    120 F. Supp. 768 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1954

    Kagonese and Joseph V. Scaravelli were partners doing business as the Square Construction Company. … See United States v. Atlantic Dredginq Co., 253 U. S. 1, 9-11 .

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Western States Construction Co. v. United States

    38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,376 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1992

    Co. v. … According to the court: The Board’s failure to consider the evidence of trade practice and custom on the basis of absence of ambiguity was in error.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gersten Construction Co., a California Corporation v. The United States

    346 F.2d 973 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

    Christian and Associates v. … In support of its contention, defendant cites, inter alia, the following cases : United States v. Shaw, 309 U.S. 495 , 160 S.Ct. 659 , 84 L.Ed. 888 (1940); Waylyn Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harvey v. United States

    13 Ct. Cl. 322 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1877

    (Beaumont v. Bramley, 1 Turn. & R., 41-50; Marquess of Breadalbane v. Marquess of Chandos, 2 Myl. & Cr., *337 711; Fowler v. Fowler, 4 De. G., & J., 255; Sells v. Sells, 1 Drew. & Sm., 42; Loyd v. … (Bentley v. McKay, 31 L. J., Ch., 709; Baldwin et al. v. Mildeberger, 2 Hall, 176 ; Cowles v. Browne 10 Paige, 534 ; Calverley v. Williams, 1 Ves., jr., 211.)”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • International Harvester Company, a Corporation v. The United States

    342 F.2d 432 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1965

    Colton v. Colton, 127 U.S. 300, 310 , 8 S.Ct. 1164 , 32 L.Ed. 138 (1888); Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. et al. v. … Des Moines Union Railway Co. et al., 254 U.S. 196 , 208, 41 S.Ct. 81 , 65 L.Ed. 219 (1920); Mahaffey v. Helvering, 140 F.2d 879, 882 (8th Cir. 1944); Edgerton v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Myers v. United States

    177 F. Supp. 952 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 4, 1959

    John Stub v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 710, 718 . … During the first three months, plaintiff was assigned certain detailed things to work out in the way of installations and things of that nature, and worked over drawing boards as an engineering layout draftsman. e.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.