Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
3.18s
New World Life Ins. Co. v. United States
26 F. Supp. 444 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1939
Helvering v. … The decisions of the United States Board of Tax Appeals in Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 33 B.T.A. 708 ; Monarch Life Insurance Company v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedSuperior Pine Products Co. v. United States
201 Ct. Cl. 455 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1973
Plaintiff sold on a stumpage basis 2,311,070 and 5,903,744 board feet of timber respectively in 1946 and 1947. … Palmer v. Bender, 287 U.S. 551 (1933); Crosby v. United States, 414 F. 2d 822, 825 (5th Cir. 1969); Dyal v. United States, supra; Boeing v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 9, 28 , 98 F. Supp. 581, 585 (1951) ; Huxford v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTexas City Terminal Railway Co. v. United States
152 F. Supp. 227 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957
S. 462 , and Le Tulle v. Scofield, 308 U. S. 415 . In support of its position plaintiff cites Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Company, 315 U. … Helvering v. New Haven & S. L. R.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSnyder-Lynch Motors, Inc. v. United States
154 Ct. Cl. 476 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961
Ragonese, et al. v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 156 ; Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 387 . Plaintiff’s unrecovered indirect costs of procuring the tank engine parts was $87,587.06. … The General Provisions of Contract Ord-242 are contained under Title V and provide in part: V-A General Provisions The General Provisions hereinafter set forth are included in and made a part of this contract.
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Cl. Ct. 580 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 6, 1988
See Thomas v. … Further, the decision in Railroad Retirement Board v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedFaith Hospital Ass'n v. United States
634 F.2d 526 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1980
McDonald Foundation, Inc. v. United States, No. 270-78, 'post at 592. See also Lodi Memorial Hospital v. Califano, 451 F. Supp. 651 (D. D.C. 1978). But see Vallejo General Hospital v. … Himmler v. Califano, 611 F.2d 137,140 (6th Cir. 1979) citing Martinez v. Richardson, 472 F.2d 1121, 1123 (10th Cir. 1973).
Cited 1 timesPublishedGardner Machinery Corp. v. United States
34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,441 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1988
See, e.g., Technassociates, Inc. v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 200 (1988); Aeronetics Division, AAR Brooks & Perkins Corp. v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 132 (1987); Hoffman Construction Co. v. … See Technassociates v. United States, supra; Hoffman v. United States, supra. See also ReCon Paving, Inc. v. United States, 745 F.2d 34 (Fed.Cir.1984); Straga v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 61 (1985). Accord J.M.T.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMetzger ex rel. Metzger v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
22 Cl. Ct. 123 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1990
Helen Woodard, a Board certified vocational expert and rehabilitation specialist. … Watt v. Alaska, 451 U.S. 259, 265 , 101 S.Ct. 1673, 1677 , 68 L.Ed.2d 80 (1981) (quoting Blue Chip Stamps v.
Cited 5 timesPublished587 F.2d 49 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1978
John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 381 , 325 F.2d 438 (1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 931 (1964). … The following opinions all speak to fees or invoiced charges: Acme Process Equipment Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished100 F. Supp. 310 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1951
The Militia Bureau 1 was established by the act of 1916; it replaced the' National Militia Board created by the 1908 act. … Selective Draft Law Cases, (Arver v. U. S.), 245 U.S. 366 , 38 S.Ct. 159 , 62 L.Ed. 349 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedSperry Rand Corp. v. United States
475 F.2d 1168 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1973
After lengthy trial, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denied on the merits plaintiff’s claim for “recoupment of R&D costs allocated to * * *” subsequent contracts (Count *172 II), and plaintiff’s claim of right … National Presto Indus., Inc. v. United States, 175 Ct Cl. 881 (1966). Cf. R.E.D.M. Corp. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 891, 901-02 , 428 F. 2d 1304, 1309-10 (1970) ; J. L. Simmons Co. v. United States, 188 Ct.
Cited 13 timesPublished24 Cl. Ct. 420 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 9, 1991
When ruling on a motion to amend, this court in both Effingham County Board of Education v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 177 (1985), and State of Alaska v. … Rivera v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedTranstechnology Corp. v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,953 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 12, 1990
Simmons v. … Brown’s work papers recorded that 178,000 flares were rejected before the environmental shutdown in 1985.
Cited 10 timesPublished413 F.2d 548 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969
For example, in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … See also Journal Co. v. United States, 195 F.Supp. 434 (E.D.Wis.1961); Mansfield Journal Co. v. Commissioner, 274 F.2d 284 (6th Cir. 1960); Byerlite Corp. v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedRagonese & Scaravelli v. United States
120 F. Supp. 768 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1954
Kagonese and Joseph V. Scaravelli were partners doing business as the Square Construction Company. … See United States v. Atlantic Dredginq Co., 253 U. S. 1, 9-11 .
Cited 41 timesPublishedWestern States Construction Co. v. United States
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,376 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1992
Co. v. … According to the court: The Board’s failure to consider the evidence of trade practice and custom on the basis of absence of ambiguity was in error.
Cited 10 timesPublishedGersten Construction Co., a California Corporation v. The United States
346 F.2d 973 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965
Christian and Associates v. … In support of its contention, defendant cites, inter alia, the following cases : United States v. Shaw, 309 U.S. 495 , 160 S.Ct. 659 , 84 L.Ed. 888 (1940); Waylyn Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished13 Ct. Cl. 322 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1877
(Beaumont v. Bramley, 1 Turn. & R., 41-50; Marquess of Breadalbane v. Marquess of Chandos, 2 Myl. & Cr., *337 711; Fowler v. Fowler, 4 De. G., & J., 255; Sells v. Sells, 1 Drew. & Sm., 42; Loyd v. … (Bentley v. McKay, 31 L. J., Ch., 709; Baldwin et al. v. Mildeberger, 2 Hall, 176 ; Cowles v. Browne 10 Paige, 534 ; Calverley v. Williams, 1 Ves., jr., 211.)”
Cited 2 timesPublishedInternational Harvester Company, a Corporation v. The United States
342 F.2d 432 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1965
Colton v. Colton, 127 U.S. 300, 310 , 8 S.Ct. 1164 , 32 L.Ed. 138 (1888); Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. et al. v. … Des Moines Union Railway Co. et al., 254 U.S. 196 , 208, 41 S.Ct. 81 , 65 L.Ed. 219 (1920); Mahaffey v. Helvering, 140 F.2d 879, 882 (8th Cir. 1944); Edgerton v.
Cited 12 timesPublished177 F. Supp. 952 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 4, 1959
John Stub v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 710, 718 . … During the first three months, plaintiff was assigned certain detailed things to work out in the way of installations and things of that nature, and worked over drawing boards as an engineering layout draftsman. e.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna