Case law

Tucker v. United States

8 Cl. Ct. 180 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1985

See also Weimerskirch v. C.I.R., 596 F.2d 358 (9th Cir.1979); Carso n v. United States, 560 F.2d 693 (5th Cir. 1977); Gerardo v. C.I.R., 552 F.2d 549 (3d Cir.1977). Recently, in Anastasato, et al. v. C.I.R., T.C.M. … His father was Secretary of Education and Chairman of the Board of the National Theatre, and one of the biggest Shakespeareans of Latin America.

Navajo Tribe v. United States

586 F.2d 192 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1978

Similarly, the grant of admiralty jurisdiction went by the board in Matson Navigation Co. v. United States, 384 U. S. 352 (1932). This court now cites Amell v. … The rule of strict construction is very much alive in our time, as witness United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 (1968); United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976); and United States v.

Standard Shipbuilding Corp. v. United States

135 F. Supp. 892 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1955

It authorized compensation for the cost of increased wages and related expenses resulting from retroactive mandatory orders of the War Labor Board. … Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. v. United States, 339 U.S. 157 , 70 S.Ct. 545 , 94 L.Ed. 731 ; Werfel v. United States, D.C., 83 F.Supp. 507 ; Lilly v. United States Lines Co., D.C., 42 F.Supp. 214 .

Bristol & Martin, Inc. v. United States

110 F. Supp. 262 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1953

Steel Products Co. v. United States, 78 C. Cls. 410 ; Hervey Veneer Co. v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 88 . Plaintiff is not entitled to recover under the terms of the contract. Defendant has filed a counterclaim. … Plaintiff took an appeal to the Appeal Board, Office of Contract Settlement, which was denied. 21.

Benson v. United States

141 Ct. Cl. 273 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1958

Cozart v. Hudson, 239 N. C. 279 ; 78 S. E. 2d 881 (1954). … Tillman v. Bellamy, 242 N. C. 201 ; 87 S. E. 2d 253, 254 (1955); Riddle v. Artis, 243 N. C. 668 ; 91 S. E. 2d 894, 896 (1956).

American Trading Co. v. Chinese Indemnity Fund

47 Ct. Cl. 563 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1912

Allison v. Chandler, 11 Mich., 542 . In Griffin v. Colver 16 N. … In Chapman v.

Cloverport Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 121 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1986

See also Pete v. United States, 215 Ct.Cl. 377 , 569 F.2d 565 (1978); Emeny v. United States, 208 Ct.Cl. 522 , 526 F.2d 1121 (1975); Drakes Bay Land Co. v. … Mintmire was the senior attorney (and law firm partner) in this case, but had operated in many ways like a “chairman of the board.”

Doherty v. United States

500 F.2d 540 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1974

United States v. United States Coin and Currency, supra; Boyd v. … See, e.g., Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co., supra; One Lot Emerald Cut Stones v. United States, 409 U.S. 232 (1972) ; U.S. ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537 (1943) ; Helvering v.

Hines v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

21 Cl. Ct. 634 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1990

Co. v. … In Heat & Control, Inc. v.

Keydata Corp. v. United States

504 F.2d 1115 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1974

Snider v. … Co. v.

General Electric Co. v. United States

610 F.2d 730 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1979

See Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 57 , 493 F. 2d 1357 , *779 cert. denied, 419 U. S. 840 (1974); Irving Berlin Music Corp. v. United States, 203 Ct. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 99 S. Ct. 1705 (1979). The legislative history is important, however, as a background for our interpretation of the regulations at issue in this case.

Eugene C. Ottinger and Clyde L. Ottinger, a Copartnership Doing Business as Ottinger Brothers v. The United States

301 F.2d 336 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1962

Ottinger Brothers v. United States, 106 F.Supp. 198 , 123 Ct.Cl. 23 (1952). … Nichols & Company v. The United States, No. 98-54 (decided March 7, 1962). Certainly we cannot accept such an allegation when supported exclusively by admitted gossip.

Heinemann v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 564 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1984

Heinemann v. United States, 233 Ct.Cl. 479 , 620 F.2d 874 (1980). Subsequently, on January 30, 1981, the Court of Claims ordered that consideration of plaintiff’s claim by the trial judge be bifurcated. Heinemann v. … Kaplan v. Corcoran, 545 F.2d at 1077 . By its terms, the order “applies to any invention made by a Government employee.”

Martin Marietta Corp. v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 586 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1985

Both McCahill v. Helvering, 75 F.2d 725 (8th Cir.1935) and Martini v. Commissioner, 28 T.C.M. … See, e.g., Henley v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 315 , 396 F.2d 956 (1968); Martin Marietta Corp. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 453 (1983).

Lawrence B. Sheppard and Charlotte N. Sheppard v. The United States

361 F.2d 972 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966

Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965). As Mr. Justice Douglas has said: * * * Congress may be strict or lavish in its allowance of deductions or tax benefits. … See for example, Stubbs v. United States, 86 Ct.Cl. 152 (1937) (silver foxes); Pedersen v. United States, 115 Ct.Cl. 335 (1950) (dogs and cats); Krueger v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 599 (1963) (mink); Causby v.

McClary v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 728 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1988

He requested that the Special Counsel of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) commence an inquiry into the actions of DEA, but the Special Counsel declined to take any action. … Schuhl v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 207 (1983); Biagioli v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 304, 307-08 (1983). .

Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United States

442 F.2d 936 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

Bateson Co. v. United States, 308 F.2d 510, 512-513 (5th Cir. 1962). See Appeal of Fred A. Arnold, ASBCA No. 7761 , 1962 BCA ¶ 3508 ; cf. John Reiner and Co. v. … See Nager Electric Co. v.

Erie Lackawanna Railway Company v. The United States

439 F.2d 194 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1971

Co. v. United States, 319 F.2d 864, 868 , 162 Ct.Cl. 570 , 578 (1963). … V We recognize that our holding is in conflict with a decision on the same point in T.I.M.E. Freight, Inc. v. United States, 302 F.Supp. 573 (N.D.Texas 1969).

Sullivan & Sons, Inc. v. United States

129 Ct. Cl. 63 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1954

United States v. Holpuch, 328 U. S. 234, 240 ; United States v. Blair, 321 U. S. 730, 736 . … United States v. Moor man,, 338 U.

Munsey Trust Co. v. United States

67 F. Supp. 976 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1946

In Farmers’ Bank v. … But, whether in the instant case the surety’s rights arise out of subrogation to the rights of the board of trust or of the equitable liens of the laborers and materialmen, the result is the same.