Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

3.01s

  • Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. United States

    164 Ct. Cl. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1964

    Boehm v. Commissioner, supra. … Boehm v. Commissioner, supra, at 292.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Repp v. United States

    23 Cl. Ct. 628 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 26, 1991

    Brown v. Selfridge, 224 U.S. 189, 193 , 32 S.Ct. 444, 446 , 56 L.Ed. 727 (1912). The standard for probable cause is difficult to define. … In Chapman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Balis v. United States

    139 F. Supp. 930 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956

    MacFadden v. Jenkins, 40 N. D. 422 , 169 N. W. 151 . … Brown & Company and of the firm of Lukens, Savage & Washburn [Lukens, Savage, Washburn & Balis] * * *.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hendricks v. United States

    210 Ct. Cl. 266 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

    As stated by the court in Port Authority v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 108 , 432 F. 2d 455 (1970) (relying on Udall v. … Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), or because all questions concerning discrimination in Federal employment are matters exclusively within the jurisdiction of the district courts, Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Condec Corp. v. United States

    197 Ct. Cl. 368 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1972

    Sears, Roebuck *372 & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225, 231 (1964) ; United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co., 388 U.S. 365, 377-78 (1967). … Allen Brown, please find enclosed six (6) copies of Wheel Modification B-52 (Bendix) our drawing number 2101-0032. If you need any further information, feel free to contact either Mr. Brown or the writer directly. 57.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jacobson Bros. v. United States

    512 F.2d 1065 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

    It is maneuvered by selectively taking in and paying out the appropriate maneuvering lines until, through a monitor on board the vessel, visual contact with the torpedo is made. … Ellicott Machine Corp. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United States

    111 F. Supp. 945 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1953

    United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 315 U.S. 289, 301 , 62 S.Ct. 581 , 86 L.Ed. 855 ; French v. Schoemaker, 14 Wall. (U.S.) 314, 332. … In Du Puy v.

    Cited 120 timesPublished
  • Yarbrough v. United States

    169 Ct. Cl. 589 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1965

    In Dorsey v. Dorsey, supra, and quoting from Fuguay v. … But see Ray v. Social Security Board, 73 F. Supp. 58 (Ala. 1947).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. United States

    121 F. Supp. 898 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1954

    This requirement, introduced in Cortland Speciality Co. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 937 , and given prominence in Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Commissioner, supra; Helvering v. … Minnesota Tea Co., 296 U.S. 378 , 56 S.Ct. 269 , 80 L.Ed. 284 ; LeTulle V. Scofield, 308 U.S. 415 , 60 S.Ct. 313 , 84 L.Ed. 355 ; Helvering v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Beneficial Foundation, Inc. v. United States

    8 Cl. Ct. 639 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 9, 1985

    The money may be used to cover educational expenses at an approved college or university, including tuition, room and board, and textbooks. … See Schoneberger v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 1016, 1023-24 (1980); Fireoved v. United States, 318 F.Supp. 133, 143 (E.D.Pa.1970), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 462 F.2d 1281 (3d Cir.1972); Williams v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Foster v. United States

    3 Cl. Ct. 738 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1983

    No. 92-41 ( 85 Stat. 97 ) for the Renegotiation Board. … V 1981). . See Jones v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 4 (1983).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Samples v. United States

    136 Ct. Cl. 791 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 26, 1956

    See Poggas v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 385 , Samples, et al. v. United States, in the case of Cecil Brayford, et al., 135 C. Cls. 548 . … The computations set forth in Exhibit 2, and the accompanying Recapitulations 1 through 3, are based on this *796 theory of defendant, that is, that in computing overtime due to monthly wage-board employees, it is not necessary

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bienville v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,457 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 10, 1988

    Bienville appealed the CO’s decision directly to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) where the appeal is presently docketed as ASBCA No. 32819 . … Supreme Court stated in Haines v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • The Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Company v. The United States

    424 F.2d 563 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 24, 1970

    R. v. … Defendant cites the following cases: Hotel Kingkade v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. United States

    37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,245 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 20, 1991

    In his deposition, the Chairman of the DOE’s Source Evaluation Board, stated that “if someone was [sic ] going to make a proposal to purchase the plant and utilize production tax credits, ... their payment to the government … Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Passaro v. United States

    4 Cl. Ct. 395 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1984

    Sierra Club, 451 U.S. 287 , 101 S.Ct. 1775 , 68 L.Ed.2d 101 (1981); Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Cort v. … MacNamara Constr. of Manitoba v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 1, 4-5 , 509 F.2d 1166 (1975); Iowa- Wisconsin Bridge Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. United States

    11 Cl. Ct. 155 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 29, 1986

    In Yates v. … Yates v. United States Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home, supra, 533 F.Supp. at 464-65 (footnotes omitted). Similarly, in National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263 v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. United States

    137 F. Supp. 425 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

    Anderson, Clayton & Company, Inc., v. United States, 129 C. Cls. 347 . If it fell into enemy hands, of course defendant is not liable, unless the defendant had previously appropriated it. … The American Leader arrived at Manila on December 4,1941, with the cargo of tinplate on board. 7.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • First National City Bank v. United States

    548 F.2d 928 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1977

    Corp. v. American Surety Co., 39 F. Supp. 551 (W.D. Ky. 1941). See also Nippolt v. … United States v. Shannon, 342 U.S. 288, 291-92 (1952); Consumers Ice Co. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 116, 119 , 475 F. 2d 1161, 1163 (1973).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • DeCosta v. United States

    22 Cl. Ct. 165 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1990

    Money v. OPM, 811 F.2d 1474, 1477 (Fed.Cir.1987); see also Young v. Community Nutrition Inst., 476 U.S. 974, 980-81 , 106 S.Ct. 2360, 2364 , 90 L.Ed.2d 959 (1986); Horner v. … See Riggs v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.