Case law

Rogers v. United States

15 Cl. Ct. 692 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1988

Farrell v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 757, 758-59 (1986); Yokum v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 602, 608 (1986). … That statute prescribes initial determination of eligibility by the Office of Personnel Management, 5 U.S.C. § 8347 (c), followed by appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). 5 U.S.C. § 8347 (d).

Wonder Bakeries Co. v. United States

6 F. Supp. 228 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1934

See Updike v. United States, cited above. … Our attention has been called to opinions of the Board of Tax Appeals holding waivers invalid which were executed after the dissolution of a corporation.

Mount Sinai Medical Center of Greater Miami, Inc. v. United States

13 Cl. Ct. 561 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1987

The cases of Athens Community Hosp., Inc., v. Schweiker, 743 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1984), and North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. … Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir.1987), and Athens Comm. Hosp., Inc., v. Schweiker, 743 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1984). .

The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The United States

319 F.2d 161 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1963

Fire Ass’n v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 181 F.2d 133 (9th Cir., 1950). … See also Pattiz v. United States, Ct.Cl., 311 F.2d 947 .

Summers v. United States

648 F.2d 1324 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1981

Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 27, 34 , 515 F.2d 1397, 1401 (1975); Grover v. United *358 States, 200 Ct. Cl. 337, 343 (1973); Morelli v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 848, 858 (1966). … Bur v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 50, 51 , 621 F.2d 415, 416 (1980); Shaposka v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 34, 43 , 563 F.2d 1013, 1018 (1977); Gratehouse v. United States, 206 Ct.

Medical Devices of Fall River, Inc. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,768 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1989

Brown v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 768 , 524 F.2d 693 (1975). … For example, in United States v.

Fogarty v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 612 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1984

Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 114-15 , 50 S.Ct. 241 , 74 L.Ed. 731 (1930); United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441, 449 , 93 S.Ct. 1080, 1085 , 35 L.Ed.2d 412 (1973). Upon this principle both sides have staked their ease. … Granted, an agent is not taxed on the income he receives in behalf of his principal, Maryland Casualty Co. v.

Caldwell v. United States

481 F.2d 898 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1973

Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co., 324 U.S. 320 , 64 USPQ 412 (1945); Decca Ltd. v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 454 , 420 F. 2d 1010 , 164 USPQ 348 (1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 865 , 167 USPQ 321 ; Smith v. … Beidler v. United States, 253 U.S. 447 (1920); E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Union Carbide Corp., 250 F. Supp. 816 (N.D. Ill. 1966); H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 236 F.

Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Center, Inc. v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 553 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 27, 1991

Co. v. … Serv., Inc. v.

McKelvy v. United States

478 F.2d 1217 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

. *585 “But if a board of directors should declare a cash dividend and make a public announcement of the fact, the courts have held that thereafter the board has no right to reconsider and rescind its action. … Saenger, Inc. v.

Ethel Cohen, of the Estate of Harry L. Cohen, Deceased v. The United States

381 F.2d 383 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

See Johnston v. … In Malat v.

Alabama Highway Express, Inc. v. United States

175 F. Supp. 143 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1959

These rate cases do not, like many cases relating to the commerce power, of which Stafford v. Wallace, supra, and National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L. … Public Utilities Commission of State of California v. United States, 355 U.S. 534 , 78 S.Ct. 446 , 2 L.Ed.2d 470 ; Union Transfer Company v. United States, Ct.Cl., 168 F. Supp. 217 ; Hughes Transportation, Inc. v.

Chester v. United States

199 Ct. Cl. 687 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1972

Akerson, et al. v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 551, 553 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 946 (1966) ; cf. Fagans, et al. v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 716 , 277 F. 2d 469 (1960). … Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 306 U.S. 381, 394 (1939).

Wilmington Trust Co. v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 6 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 21, 1983

Arnold v. Leonard, 114 Tex. 535 , 273 S.W. 799, 803 (1925); but cf. Graham v. Franco, 488 S.W.2d 390, 392, 395-96 (Tex. 1972). In Hutchison v. … Co. v.

Watson v. United States

137 Ct. Cl. 581 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Simon v. United States, 113 C. Cls. 182 . … Simon v. United States, supra.

Union Assurance Society, Ltd. v. United States

48 F. Supp. 665 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1943

Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, 286 U. S. 319 ; Swift & Co. v. United States, 69 C. Cls. 171 , 38 F. (2d) 365. … In London & Lancashire Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, 34 B. T.

Burkhart v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 738 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1928

Much reliance is placed upon the case of Utley v. Donaldson, 24 L. Ed. 54 , to sustain the right of recovery. … The Board of Contract Adjustment recommended payment of this item in part. The Government challenges the sufficiency of the proof to sustain recovery. We think it preponderates in favor of recovery.

National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The United States

338 F.2d 99 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1964

In Ekco Products Co. v. … In The Austin Co. v.

Cole v. United States

34 Ct. Cl. 446 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1899

In the case of United States v. … He cites the case of United States v. Landers (92 U. S. B.., 77).

Kaufmann & Baer Company v. United States

137 F. Supp. 725 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

During this period and until the Tax Court decided the case of Hutzler Brothers Co. v. … The plaintiff relies on United States v.