Case law

Briggs v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 126 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1890

Again, in the case of Lamar, ex Browne, et al. ( 92 U. S. … In the case of Grossmeyer v.

Brennan v. United States

153 F. Supp. 377 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1957

Palo v. Rogers, 116 Conn. 601 , 165 Atl. 803 (1933). … Board of Capitol Managers v. Brasie, 72 Colo. 153 , 210 Pac. 63 (1922); Ross v. Kendall, 183 Mo. 338 , 81 S. W. 1107 (1904); Carpenter v. City of New York, 44 App. Div. 230 , 60 N. Y. Supp. 633 (1899).

Smith v. United States

139 F. Supp. 305 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

Helvering v. Helmholz, supra. In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … See Blakeslee v. Smith, D.C., 26 *314 F.Supp. 28 , affirmed, 2 Cir., 110 F.2d 364 ; Brown v. Routzahn, 6 Cir., 63 F.2d 914 ; Estate of Eleanor Hughes Beggs v. Commissioner, 13 T.C. 131 .

Granite Construction Co. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,240 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1991

Shea Co. v. … In Potashnick v.

National Rubber Machinery Co. v. United States

38 F. Supp. 260 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1941

This latter concession was in accord with the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Banner Machine Co. v. … As was said by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Commissioner v.

Burnett Construction Co. v. United States

38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,327 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1992

Industrial Co. v. … In Celotex Corp. v.

Bradley v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

24 Cl. Ct. 641 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1991

As recognized in Hines v. … In Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v.

Stange v. United States

68 Ct. Cl. 395 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 4, 1929

In Lynch v. Hornby, 247 U. … In our opinion the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is supported by the better reasoning, and the objections of the plaintiff to the validity of the waiver must be overruled.

Arshal v. United States

621 F.2d 421 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1980

The case is before us on plaintiffs exception to the recommended decision submitted by Trial Judge Browne under Rule 54(a). … Mathematically, therefore, the total imaginary volume of water expended after two minutes, V’(2 min), would be: V'(2 min) = V'(t,) + V'(t2) + V'(t3) + V'(t4) = R'(tj) 1/2 + R'(tj) 1/2 + R' (t3) 1/2 + R' (t4) 1/2 ~ V( 2 min

West Seattle General Hospital, Inc. v. United States

674 F.2d 899 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 10, 1982

. § 1491 (1976), see Whitecliff Inc. v. United States, 210 Ct. … Goldstein v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 888 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 974 (1973).

Clinton Trust Co. v. United States

52 F. Supp. 671 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1943

Due to insolvency it closed on March 4, 1933, and remained closed until May 1934, at which time a plan of reorganization previously adopted by its Board of Directors was put into effect. … This Court said many years ago in Johnston v. United States, 17 Ct.Cl. 157, 171 , that this remedial statute should be construed liberally and we agree. We have already quoted the statute.

Cartwright v. United States

16 Cl. Ct. 238 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1989

Morrow v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 290, 296 , 647 F.2d 1099, 1103 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 940 , 102 S.Ct. 475 , 70 L.Ed.2d 247 (1981); Durco v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 424, 427 (1988); Tafoya v. … Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216-17 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).

Harvey-Whipple, Inc. v. The United States

342 F.2d 48 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

Formal termination of the contract for default was effected as of February 4, 1957. 3 Plaintiff’s appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals was dismissed, the Board holding that it had no equity jurisdiction … Thus, the case was distinguished from Hellander v.

Morgan v. United States

5 Ct. Cl. 182 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869

The cases of Trinity Hause v. Clark, (4 M. & S., 288,) and New Berry v. … In the case of Waters v.

Conservative Caucus, Inc. v. United States

650 F.2d 1206 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1981

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972); National Consumer Information Center v. Gallegos, 549 F.2d 822, 828 (D.C. Cir. 1977). … Carruth v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 422 , 627 F.2d 1068 (1980), Walton v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 755 (1977) and Muehlen v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 690 (1976). V.

Oliver Typewriter Co. v. United States

14 F. Supp. 543 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1936

United States v. Felt & Tarrant Co., supra; Electric Power & Light Corporation v. United States, supra. … Stange v. United States, 282 U.S. 270, 274 , 51 S.Ct. 145 , 75 L.Ed. 335 ; Aiken v. Bur-net, 282 U.S. 277, 280 , 51 S.Ct. 148 , 75 L.Ed. 339 ; Brown & Sons Co. v.

American Mail Line Ltd. v. United States

101 F. Supp. 364 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1951

In order to carry out the change of domicile, the respective boards of directors of both corporations, on July 23, 1947, entered into a Merger Agreement which became effective on November 11, 1947. … Co. v. Willcuts, 2 F. Supp. 789 .

Drummond v. United States

45 Ct. Cl. 219 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 28, 1910

(Green v. New River Co., 4 T. R., 590.) … The case comes directly within the principle cited with approval by the Supreme Court in Tilt v. Kelsey ( 207 U.

Aeronetics Division, AAR Brooks & Perkins Corp. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,253 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 9, 1987

Moseley Co. v. … Upon proper certification, plaintiff also retains the option to refile its claim in this Court or to appeal to the Board of Contract Appeals.

Beverly Glen Hospital v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 467 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 27, 1983

Each is a separate corporation with its own board of directors, maintains its own books, and has executed a Medicare provider agreement with the Secretary. … American Medicorp, Inc. v.