Case law

American Standard Ship Fittings Corp v. United States

70 Ct. Cl. 679 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1930

Jacob Reed's Sons v. United States, 273 U. S. 200 . … The statute of limitations which is jurisdictional in this court —United States v. Wardwell, 172 U. S. 48 , 52—begins to run when a suit may first be brought under our jurisdictional act. Rice v.

Brennan v. United States

153 F. Supp. 377 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1957

Palo v. Rogers, 116 Conn. 601 , 165 Atl. 803 (1933). … Board of Capitol Managers v. Brasie, 72 Colo. 153 , 210 Pac. 63 (1922); Ross v. Kendall, 183 Mo. 338 , 81 S. W. 1107 (1904); Carpenter v. City of New York, 44 App. Div. 230 , 60 N. Y. Supp. 633 (1899).

Murphy v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 147 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1990

In Jamerson v. … Murphy v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 385, 406 (1989). .

Handel v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,605 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1988

Included with the final decision letter was an attachment document which detailed that the estate could appeal the final decision to the HUD Board of Contract Appeals within 90 days from receipt of the decision or to the … Maurice Electric Supply Co. v. Anderson Safeway Guard Rail Corp., 632 F.Supp. 1082 , 1089 n. 13 (D.D.C.1986) (citing Jack Pry Inc. v. Drazin, 173 A.2d 222, 223 (D.C.Mun.App.1961)); cf. Cavic v.

Jones & Sears, Inc. v. United States

158 Ct. Cl. 162 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

Choteau v. United States, 20 Ct. Cl. 250 (1885). … Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Company v. United States, 114 Ct. Cl. 464 (1949), *173 cert. denied 339 U.S. 982 .

Carchia v. United States

485 F.2d 622 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1973

Unlike Dale Construction Co. v. United States, 168 Ct.Cl. 692, 733, 847-849 (1964), and William Green Construction Co. v. … In Anderson v.

Mosely v. United States

15 Cl. Ct. 193 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 27, 1988

Mosely filed an administrative appeal, and the Interior Board of Land Appeals affirmed the BLM’s decision on March 10, 1982. … Nemaizer v. Baker, 793 F.2d 58, 60-61 (2d Cir.1986); Schwarz v. Folloder, 767 F.2d 125, 129 (5th Cir.1985) (quoting Smoot v. Fox, 340 F.2d 301, 303 (6th Cir.1964)); Wainwright Sec. Inc. v. Wall St.

Bradley v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

24 Cl. Ct. 641 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1991

As recognized in Hines v. … In Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v.

Spirit Leveling Contractors v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,770 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1989

This provision permits the contractor to bring an action directly on a claim in the Claims Court in lieu of appealing the contracting officer’s final decision on that claim to an agency board. … However, none were on point nor binding on this court as they were all board decisions. .

West Seattle General Hospital, Inc. v. United States

674 F.2d 899 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 10, 1982

. § 1491 (1976), see Whitecliff Inc. v. United States, 210 Ct. … Goldstein v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 888 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 974 (1973).

Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul, a Public Corporation v. The United States

432 F.2d 455 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1970

See also McKnight v. United States, 259 F.2d 540, 544 (9th Cir. 1958) and Clark Investment Co. v. United States, 364 F.2d 7, 9 (9th Cir. 1966). … But as the Supreme Court held in Udall v.

Fraass Surgical Manufacturing Co. v. United States

505 F.2d 707 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 20, 1974

Scott v. United States, 18 Ct. Cl. 1 (1882), and Wood v. United States, 25 Ct. … In Zidell Ex plorations, Inc. v. United States, 192 Ct.

Peden v. United States

512 F.2d 1099 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

Cohen v. United States, supra; Finn v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 1 (1961). See also, Polconer v. Secretary of the Treasury, 477 F. 2d 1223 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 1001 . … Polcover, supra, Finn, supra; See, Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391 , 397 (1938); Silver v. McCamey, 221 F. 2d 873 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Lewis v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 158 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1983

The timely filing of the necessary pleading by a claimant is jurisdictional (Kirby v. … Probably because of court decisions such as those in Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct.Cl. 306 (1964), and Kingsley v.

Fawick Corp. v. United States

149 Ct. Cl. 623 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1960

As this court stated in Myerle, Exr., v. The United States, 33 Ct. … Clapp v. United States, 127 Ct. Cl. 505 , cert. den. 348 U.S. 834 .

Tennessee Products Corp. v. United States

107 F. Supp. 578 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1952

Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U. S. 591 . … Penney & Long v. Commissioner, 39 F. 2d 849 ; of. Burnet v. Houston, 283 U. S. 223 .

Harry J. Amell v. The United States

390 F.2d 880 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1968

Plaintiffs are wage board employees. … Amell v. United States, 384 U.S. 158 , 86 S.Ct. 1384 , 16 L.Ed.2d 445 (1966). 2 .

Tidewater Management Services, Inc. v. United States

573 F.2d 65 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1978

Heyer Products Co. v. United States, supra; Keco Industries (II) v. United States, supra. … The Board, however, directed her to conduct negotiations with all 13 offerors.

Orchards v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 601 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1984

It is operated by a board of directors elected by the landholders, who in turn elect the officers (§ 87.03.115). … The board is granted the usual powers to make contracts and all necessary rules and regulations for the conduct of the affairs of the district (§ 87.03.115).

Maki v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,417 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 9, 1987

Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. Murata Machinery, Ltd., 731 F.2d 831, 836 , 221 USPQ 561, 564 (Fed.Cir.1984). Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. … Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 180, 199 , 351 F.2d 956, 968 (1965); Roberts v. United States, 174 Ct.Cl. 940, 946 , 357 F.2d 938, 949 (1966); G.M. Shupe, Inc. v.