Case law

Collins v. United States

14 Ct. Cl. 568 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1878

(United States v. Hartwell, 6 Wall., 385 ; Const., Art. II, sec. 2; 95 U. S., 762 .) … (United States v. Germaine, 99 U. S., 503 ).

Anderson v. United States

174 F. Supp. 945 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1959

Pumpelly v. Green Bay Company, 1871, 80 U.S. 166, 181 ; United States v. Cress, 1917, 243 U.S. 316 ; Soules v. *693 Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 1916, 34 N.D. 7 , 157 N.W. 823 ; Reichert v. Northern Pac. Ry. … Yazel v. United States, 1950, 118 C. Cls. 59, 71-73; Coates v. United States, 1953, 124 C. Cls. 806, 811-813 ; Crites v. United States, 1955, 132 C. Cls. 544 . See also Sanguinetti v. United States, 1924, 264 U.S. 146 .

Jones v. United States

63 Ct. Cl. 534 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1927

It is plain that the contracting officer did not examine or probably even read the contract before executing it, and the same may be said of the adjustment board which approved it. … Tempel v. United States, 248 U. S. 121, 129 ; Ball Engineering Co. v. J. G. White & Co., 250 U. S. 46, 57 ; John Horstmann Co. v. United States, 257 U. S. 138, 146 ; and Klebe v. United States, 263 U. S. 188, 191 .

Seery v. United States

161 F. Supp. 395 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1958

Seery v. United States, 130 C. Cls. 481 . We adhere to the views expressed in that opinion. … Included in the amount paid for work on the Haus am See were repairs to the roof, chimney flashings, and gutters; painting of the buildings; replacement of rotten boards *262 in the boathouse, and the dismantling and packing

Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp. v. United States

3 F. Supp. 240 · United States Court of Claims · May 8, 1933

Cl. 70 , and the Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer Works v. U. S., 76 Ct. Cl. -, 1 F. Supp. 854 , as authority for this position. … The Board of Tax Appeals has repeatedly held that the extension date for the filing of the final return starts the statute to run. The actions of the Commissioner were within the legal requirements *245 of the statute.

Spirit Leveling Contractors v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,770 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1989

This provision permits the contractor to bring an action directly on a claim in the Claims Court in lieu of appealing the contracting officer’s final decision on that claim to an agency board. … However, none were on point nor binding on this court as they were all board decisions. .

Three S Constructors, Inc. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,348 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 31, 1987

United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., 702 F.2d 1362, 1367 (Fed.Cir.1983); Electro-Meth-ods, Inc. v. United States, 728 F.2d 1471 (Fed.Cir.1984); ATL, Inc. v. United States, 735 F.2d 1343 (Fed.Cir.1984); ATL, Inc. v. … FRCP, RUSCC 15 (c); Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984); Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 570, 588 , 372 F.2d 951, 961 (1967); Boyce v.

Merriam v. United States

29 Ct. Cl. 250 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1894

R., 195 ; Burns, 7 id., 220 ; Hobbs, 19 id., 324 ; Brown, 17 id., 303 ; Little, 19 id., 323 .) … (Lloyd v. Hough, 1 How., 153 , 159 ; Carpenter v.

Lewis v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 158 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1983

The timely filing of the necessary pleading by a claimant is jurisdictional (Kirby v. … Probably because of court decisions such as those in Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct.Cl. 306 (1964), and Kingsley v.

Ewald v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 378 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 26, 1988

(e) Permitting the Department of Interior to influence local boards of zoning, planning, platting, health and others to adopt and promulgate limiting and restricting rules and regulations concerning lands within the park. … See, e.g., Althaus v. U.S., 7 Cl.Ct. 688 (1985); Constantine v. U.S., 14 Cl.Ct. 339 (1988); Christenson v. U.S., Cl.Ct. No. 451-85L; Mostad v. U.S., Cl.Ct. No. 196-86L; Miller v. U.S., Cl.Ct. No. 269-86L; Donnelly v.

American Auto Parts Co. v. United States

162 Ct. Cl. 23 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1963

Inc. v. United States, 52 F. 2d 31 (C.A. 2, 1931); American Elastics v. United States, 187 F. 2d 109 (C.A. 2, 1951) ; United States v. Silverton, 200 F. 2d 824 (C.A. 1, 1952); Standard Magnesium Corporation v. … Thereafter, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, Navy Panel, dismissed the appeal by decision dated April 26, 1956, on the ground that the claim was not within the jurisdiction of the board since it said questions

Polansky

546 F.2d 429 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1976

Subsequent appeal to the Board of Appeals and Beview was similarly unsuccessful. “Suit, was initially brought in the U.S. … Birnholz v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 532 (1972); Chiaverini v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 371 (1962); Rubin v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 28 (1960); Chiriaco v. United States, 235 F. Supp. 850 (N.D.

Brennan v. United States

153 F. Supp. 377 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1957

As was stated in Monroe v. … Board of Capitol Managers v. Brasie, 1922, 72 Colo. 153 , 210 P. 63 ; Ross v. Kendall, 1904, 183 Mo. 338 , 81 S.W. 1107 ; Carpenter v. City of New York, 1899, 44 App.Div. 230 , 60 N.Y.S. 633 .

Estate of Winton v. Amos

51 Ct. Cl. 284 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1916

O'Hara v. McConnell, 93 U. S., 150 ; Shields v. Barrow, 17 How., 130 ; Carey v. Brown, 92 U. S., 171 . Especially is the rule applicable where the trustee is to be bound by the decree. Cunningham v. Macon R. R. … S., 446 ; McArthur v. Scott, 113 U. S., 340 ; Kerrison v. Stewart, 93 U. S., 155 .

Paul v. United States

21 Cl. Ct. 758 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1990

Services as an officer of, or on the board of directors of, a native entity. 20. Services on, or in connection with, state administrative boards, agencies or task forces. 21. … In Paul v.

Hayes International Corp. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,392 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1985

The Navy Source Selection Board recommended award of the contract to Whitehall subject to a successful pre-award survey of its principal place of performance at Greenville, Mississippi. … See Speco Corp. v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 335 (1983). II.

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. United States

51 Ct. Cl. 394 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1916

A board appointed for that purpose by the Secretary of the Navy found the cost of the additional armor for the fire-control tower of the Arkansas to be $31,706.92, which report was approved by the said Secretary and accepted … Garrison v. United States, 7 Wall., 688 ; Simpson v. United States, 31 C. Cls., 392 .

J. Robert Bonnar v. The United States

438 F.2d 540 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

To demonstrate his loyalty to the United States, the plaintiffs emphasize his high position with the War Production Board as if he were a member of that Board. … Keppelmann v. Palmer, 252 U.S. 581 , 40 S.Ct. 392 , 64 L.Ed. 727 (1920); Cordero v. Brownell, 211 F.2d 90 (2d Cir., 1954); and Feller v. McGrath, supra. In Keppelmann v.

American Standard Ship Fittings Corp v. United States

70 Ct. Cl. 679 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1930

Jacob Reed's Sons v. United States, 273 U. S. 200 . … The statute of limitations which is jurisdictional in this court —United States v. Wardwell, 172 U. S. 48 , 52—begins to run when a suit may first be brought under our jurisdictional act. Rice v.

Republic Chemical Corp. v. United States

141 F. Supp. 949 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

Compare Surplus Properties Corp. v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 709 . The plaintiff contends that if it was in default, the defendant waived this breach of the contract. … It shall be the duty of the Board to facilitate the transfer of surplus property from one Government agency to other Government agencies for their use; and the transfer of surplus property under this section shall be given