Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
6.19s
Ring Construction Corp. v. United States
162 F. Supp. 190 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1958
All face brick joints throughout the work shall be rodded with a round rod approximately V/p inch in diameter, so as to provide a slightly concave joint that will seal the mortar against the upper and lower front edge of … Payment for plaintiff’s claimed additional costs in the several claims, hereinabove described, was denied by the contracting officer, and subsequently by the Board of Contract Appeals in a written decision which was filed
Cited 20 timesPublished69 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1929
Moss, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: In September, 1919, the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation entered into a written agreement with the Jacksonville Shipping Corporation, under the’ terms … For cases in point see: Harvey v. Connecticut, etc., Ry. Co., 124 Mass. 421 ; 26 Am. Rep. 673 ; Brackett v. McNair, 7 Am. Dec. 447 ; Ogden v. Marshall, 59 Am. Dec. 497 , 498.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFARWELL COMPANY v. United States
148 F. Supp. 947 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957
. *949 The question of whether or not “pipe” also means “tubing” was decided by this court when the case was previously before it on cross-motions for summary judgment, Farwell Co., Inc., v. … The statements contained in the contracting officer’s memorandum, and the decision of the Claims and Appeals Board therein quoted, indicate without question that the bid on the Big Springs project was qualified, to the extent
Cited 1 timesPublished69 Ct. Cl. 600 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930
Dermott v. Jones, 2 Wall. 1 ; United States v. Gleason, 175 U. S. 588 . In Sun Printing & Publishing Association v. Moore, 183 U. … In Riddlesbarger v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGiles Industries, Inc. v. United States
496 F.2d 556 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1974
Bakery, Inc. v. United States, supra, Irby Constr. Co. v. … Reynolds Tobacco Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished97 F. Supp. 804 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1951
Howell, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Francis V. … Retired Regular Army officer whose appearance before an Army retiring board had been determined to be inappropriate. Cf. Whelpley v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 56 . Wilhelm, Military Dictionary and Gazetteer. Magurn v.
Cited 10 timesPublished36 Ct. Cl. 531 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 28, 1901
Brown, Auditor.” Section 2 of the act of March 3, 1883 (22 Stat. L., 485), under which the claim was transmitted, is as follows: “ Section 2. … See also thé case of Pike v. Martindale, 91 Mo., 268, 285 ; Brown v. County of Buena Vista, 95 U. S. R., 157, 160 ; Balmer v. United States, 26 C. Cls.
Cited 3 timesPublished17 Cl. Ct. 607 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 7, 1989
Thereafter, he sought relief from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. By memorandum dated January 21, 1982, he was informed that his application had been denied. … Mack v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 187, 190-91 , 635 F.2d 828, 831 (1980); Eastport S.S. Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 605 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 (1967).
Cited 1 timesPublishedSafeway Stores, Incorporated v. The United States
310 F.2d 742 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1962
United States v. … Koppers Co., Inc. v. United States, 134 F.Supp. 290 , 133 Ct.Cl. 22 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedPat Barkley Court Reporters v. United States
31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,218 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1984
MDA 903-81-D-0010, hereinafter Contract 0010) for the acquisition of stenographic reporting services for hearings before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) between March 1 and September 30, 1981. … See South Louisiana Grain Services, Inc. v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 281, 289 (1982); Ball v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 180, 183 (1982). Cf. Prestex, Inc. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 373, 377-79 (1983); Dalaly v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPackard Motor Car Co. v. United States
39 F.2d 991 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930
Hellmich v. Hellman, 276 U. S. 233 , 48 S. Ct. 244 , 72 L. Ed. 544 , 56 A. L. R. 379; Tennessee v. Whitworth, 117 U. S. 129 , 6 S. Ct. 645 , 29 L. … United States v. Fisher, 2 Cranch, 358 , 2 L. Ed. 304 ; Kohlsaat v. Murphy, 96 U. S. 153 , 24 L. Ed. 844 ; Hellmich v. Hellman, 276 U. S. 233 , 48 S. Ct. 244 , 72 L. Ed. 544 , 56 A. L. R. 379.
Cited 5 timesPublished305 F.2d 455 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962
Holsey v. Commissioner, 258 F.2d 865, 869; Northrup v. United States, 240 F.2d 304 , 307. However, in this situation, Mr. Neff, after the sale, had a quite different interest than before. … This was likewise held in the case of Radnitz v. United States, 187 F. Supp. 952, 956 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedNorthlich, Stolley, Inc. v. The United States
368 F.2d 272 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1966
Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 , 54 S.Ct. 8 , 78 L.Ed. 212 (1933); Helvering v. Taylor, 293 U.S. 507 , 55 S.Ct. 287 , 79 L.Ed. 623 (1935); Samuel Heath Co. v. United States, 2 F.Supp. 637 , 77 Ct.Cl. 219 (1933); Nowland v. … In Irby Construction Co. v.
Cited 31 timesPublishedAlcea Band of Tillamooks v. United States
87 F. Supp. 938 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 3, 1950
Iowa Tribe of Indians v. United States, 68 Ct.Cl. 585 ; Blackfeet Nations v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 101 ; Shoshone Tribe of Indians of Wind River Reservation in Wyoming v. United States, 85 Ct.Cl. 331 . … Blackfeather v. United States, 28 Ct.Cl. 447 , reversed 155 U.S. 180 , 15 S.Ct. 64 , 39 L.Ed. 114 ; Creek Nation v. United States, 78 Ct.Cl. 474 .
Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Alcea Band of Tillamooks, 341 U.S. 48 (1951)Cited 11 timesPublishedSudametal Sociedad Anonima Sud Americana De Metales Y Minerales v. United States
88 F. Supp. 293 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1950
grade as plaintiff’s tin, and during the year 1942 it sold approximately 16,000 tons of tin at this price, and it was in position to supply tin to every holder of a priority or allocation for tin from the War Production Board … A. v. United States, supra, and in Fabrica Uruguaya de Neumaticos, S. A. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished146 F. Supp. 956 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1956
The ordinary rule, however, is that stated in Martilla v. United States, 118 C. … However, following the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in Reynolds v. Lovett, 201 F. 2d 181 , certiorari denied sub nomine Wilson v. Reynolds, 345 U.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 Cl. Ct. 784 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1985
From the 20% disability rating issued on August 9, 1983, plaintiff formally appealed to the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) in February of 1984. … See Bevelheimer v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 558 (1984); Bonen v.
Cited 5 timesPublished618 F.2d 121 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1979
As we said in Gosman v. United States, 215 Ct. … Elizabeth Hospital v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 322, 326-27 , 558 F. 2d 8, 11-12 (1977); Overlook Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 60, 65 , 556 F. 2d 500, 502 (1977); Whitecliff, Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished86 Ct. Cl. 311 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1938
Co. v. … In Hildreth v. Mastoras, 257 U.
Cited 5 timesPublished42 Ct. Cl. 157 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1907
(Dynes v. Hoover, 20 How., 65 ; Ex parte Reed, 100 U. S., 13 ; Smith v. Whitney, 116 U. S., 167 ; Johnson v. Sayre, 158 U. S., 109 ; Swaine v. United States, 165 U. S., 553 ; Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U. … In the case of State v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna