Case law

Lovell v. United States

59 Ct. Cl. 494 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 31, 1924

Harvey v. United States, 105 U. S., 671 ; Garfielde v. United States, 93 U. S., 242 ; Ackerlind v. United States, 240 U. S., 531 . … A sufficient supply of water was available, as well as business houses and places where his laborers might secure board and lodging.

American Chemical Society v. The United States

438 F.2d 597 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

For example, the Chairman of the Board of the Society, speaking for the Board, stated unequivocally that the Society could not, and would not, enter into the contract if it had to absorb any costs, that is, unless the interest … Citing Carlstrom v. United States, 177 F.Supp. 245 , 147 Ct.Cl. 297 (1959), and Riverside Military Academy, Inc. v. United States, 122 Ct.Cl. 756, 784 (1952). 9 . Cf. J. L. Simmons Co. v.

Whelan Security Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,274 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1985

. §§ 5.11 (b), 5.12 (1981)); 2) before the Wage Appeals Board ( 29 C.F.R. § 7.9 ); or before the Contracting Officer, since the contract contained the liquidated damages statute, and the dispute arose under the contract ( … Baylor v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 331, 340 (1972).

Sokoloff v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 140 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 14, 1983

The Appeals Review Board, Civil Service Commission (ARB) (now Office of Appeals, Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)) subsequently denied plaintiff’s request to reopen and reconsider the FEAA decision. … In Burkett v.

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United States

454 F.2d 740 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1972

Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States, 176 Ct.Cl. 1265, 1275 (1966); Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 265, 272 (1963); Pennsylvania R. R. v. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R., 299 U.S. 393, 397 , 57 S.Ct. 265 , 81 L.Ed. 301 (1937); Great N. Ry. v.

Harry C. v. United States

181 Ct. Cl. 331 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1967

[In re Brown, 242 N.Y. 1 , 150 N.E. 581, 582 (1926).] See also Grace Bros. v. Commissioner, 173 F. 2d 170, 176 (9th Cir. 1949). In the case of Menendez v. … In re Brown, supra.

Howard Industries, Inc. v. United States

115 F. Supp. 481 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1953

Schad v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 136 F. 2d 991, 993 . … V.)

General Foods Corp. v. United States

530 F.2d 923 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1976

See Pattiz v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 121 , 311 F. 2d 947 (1963); Commissioner v. Morgan, 272 F. 2d 936 (9th Cir. 1959); Rosen v. United States, 288 F. 2d 658 (3d Cir. 1961); United States v. … Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157, 170 (1968); Brown v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 203, 210 , 426 F. 2d 355, 357 (1970); and Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United States, 194 Ct.

Michtom v. United States

573 F.2d 58 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1978

See Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner, 350 U. S. 46 (1955); Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U. S. 260 (1958); Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport Inc., 364 U. S. 130 (1960); Commissioner v. … Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U. S. 563, 571 (1965). An exchange is defined in the regulations as a "reciprocal transfer of property as distinguished from the transfer of property for money consideration only.” Treas.

MacConnell v. United States

217 Ct. Cl. 33 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1978

V 1975). … V 1975) as amended by Pub.

Kawneer Co. v. United States

100 Ct. Cl. 523 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1943

S. 655 , and Kingan Company v. United States, 71 C. Cls. 19 . … Sea *539 board Air Line Railway v. United States, supra, and King an dc Company v. United States, supra.

Ring Construction Corp. v. United States

162 F. Supp. 190 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1958

All face brick joints throughout the work shall be rodded with a round rod approximately V/p inch in diameter, so as to provide a slightly concave joint that will seal the mortar against the upper and lower front edge of … Payment for plaintiff’s claimed additional costs in the several claims, hereinabove described, was denied by the contracting officer, and subsequently by the Board of Contract Appeals in a written decision which was filed

Norwood Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,917 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 10, 1990

Simmons Co. v. … Thereafter, plaintiff used lk inch thick wafer-board for the pallet deck in lieu of the originally specified 1% inch decking.

Rupprecht v. United States

11 Cl. Ct. 689 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1987

See Kunsman v. Commissioner, 49 T.C. 62, 71 (1967). … See Edison International, Inc. v. Commissioner, No. 42305-84.

Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 746 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1984

In Blake v. … In Crenshaw v.

FARWELL COMPANY v. United States

148 F. Supp. 947 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

. *949 The question of whether or not “pipe” also means “tubing” was decided by this court when the case was previously before it on cross-motions for summary judgment, Farwell Co., Inc., v. … The statements contained in the contracting officer’s memorandum, and the decision of the Claims and Appeals Board therein quoted, indicate without question that the bid on the Big Springs project was qualified, to the extent

Mangelsdorf v. United States

69 Ct. Cl. 600 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930

Dermott v. Jones, 2 Wall. 1 ; United States v. Gleason, 175 U. S. 588 . In Sun Printing & Publishing Association v. Moore, 183 U. … In Riddlesbarger v.

Giles Industries, Inc. v. United States

496 F.2d 556 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1974

Bakery, Inc. v. United States, supra, Irby Constr. Co. v. … Reynolds Tobacco Co. v.

Terry v. United States

97 F. Supp. 804 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1951

Howell, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Francis V. … Retired Regular Army officer whose appearance before an Army retiring board had been determined to be inappropriate. Cf. Whelpley v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 56 . Wilhelm, Military Dictionary and Gazetteer. Magurn v.

Selman v. United States

498 F.2d 1354 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

Benton v. United States, supra at 269, 488 F. 2d at 1020 . Thus, Fox v. … Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 464 P. 2d 838 , 842 (D.C. Cir. 1972). We have disregarded the affidavit in reaching our conclusion.