Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

0.86s

  • Incorporated Trustees of the Gospel Worker Society v. United States

    6 Cl. Ct. 308 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 13, 1984

    Because of the decision in The Incorporated Trustees Of The Gospel Worker Society v. … In Rowan Cos., Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Forward Communications Corp. v. United States

    608 F.2d 485 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1979

    Plaintiffs board approved the prospective termination of the CBS affiliation on condition that its officers could obtain from ABC the acceptable contract that they had tentatively negotiated. … Meredith Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 1 , 405 F.2d 1214 (1968); Roy H. Park Broadcasting, Inc. v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 784 (1971); Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp. v. United States, 204 Ct.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Augenblick v. United States

    509 F.2d 1157 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1975

    The ruling was across the board. Gosa v. Mayden is sufficient to dispose of plaintiff’s claim that he is entitled to the coverage of O'Callahan v. Parker. … H In Parker v. Levy, supra, and Secretary of the Navy v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Whelan Security Co. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,274 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1985

    . §§ 5.11 (b), 5.12 (1981)); 2) before the Wage Appeals Board ( 29 C.F.R. § 7.9 ); or before the Contracting Officer, since the contract contained the liquidated damages statute, and the dispute arose under the contract ( … Baylor v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 331, 340 (1972).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Power v. United States

    531 F.2d 505 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1976

    Peters v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 63 , 408 F. 2d 719 (1969); Powers v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 626 (1965); Harrington v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1110 (1966); Greenway v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 72 (1963). … Birnholz v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 532 (1972); Cook v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 438 (1964); Dulcy v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 153 , 284 F. 2d 687 (1960).

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Reagan v. United States

    35 Ct. Cl. 90 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1900

    People ex rel. v. Stout, 11 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.), 17; S. C., 19 How. Pr. (N. Y.), 171; People v. Bearfield, 35 Barb., 254 ; Patton v. Vaughan, 39 Ark., 211; People v. Hill, 7 Cal., 97 ; City of Hoboken v. Gear, 25 N. J. … L., 265; Smith v. Brown, 59 Cal., 672 ; People ex rel. v. Higgins, 15 Ill., 110 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sorensen v. United States

    51 Ct. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 7, 1916

    Bank v. … In Bean v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • LaMear v. United States

    9 Cl. Ct. 562 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1986

    Introduction Plaintiff, Jennie Red Fox LaMear, is a member of the Blackfeet Tribe of the *563 Blackfeet Indian Reservation, located in Browning, Montana. … Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co., 544 F.2d 1126 (2d Cir.1976); Prakash v. American University, et al., 727 F.2d 1174, 1179 (D.C.Cir.1984); Grafon Corp. v. Hausermann, 602 F.2d 781 (7th Cir.1979). See also, McNutt v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston v. United States

    37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,255 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1992

    See, Triax Co. v. … In Christie-Willamette, 85-1 B.C.A. para. 17,930 (NASA BCA 1985 ), the board considered that the contractor could not credibly deny that he had certified the claims in the event fraud was raised.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shank-Artukovich v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,372 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1987

    The contract did not expressly refer to breast-boards or to any other form of face support. … Shea Co. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. United States

    175 Ct. Cl. 496 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1966

    App. p. 6213 (1964 Ed.)) was substantially the same as Rule 13(a). 6 In United States v. … See Moore v. N.Y. Cotton Exchange, 270 U.S. 593, 609-610 (1926); United Artists Corp. v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., 221 F. 2d 213, 216 (2d Cir. 1955).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • DeRoo v. United States

    12 Cl. Ct. 356 · United States Court of Claims · May 22, 1987

    Eugene Brown of Pioneer Mortgage that Mr. DeRoo’s application for a mortgage would be approved. Based upon this assurance, Mr. DeRoo caused the foundation for his home to be constructed. Thereafter, Mr. … Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 384 , 68 S.Ct. 1, 3 , 92 L.Ed. 10 (1947). See also Lin v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 213, 216 (1983); Dalaly v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 203, 206 (1983); Housing Corp. of America v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Tlingit & Haida Indians v. United States

    389 F.2d 778 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1968

    American Cement Plaster Co. v. Acme Cement Plaster Co., 181 S.W. 257 (Tex. Civ. App., 1915); Cf. Christopher v. Garrett, 292 S.W.2d 926 (Tex. Civ. … In United States v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dilks v. United States

    94 F. Supp. 663 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 28, 1950

    reflected by the Eeport of the Committee on Naval Affairs of the House of Eepresentatives concerning an amendment to the Missing Persons Act, and by a statement made before the Committee by a member of the Army-Navy-Marine Board … Defendant points out that when Congress knows the administrative construction of a law and fails to amend the law, it may be held to have affirmed the administrative construction, citing Brooks v. Dewar, 313 U. S. 354 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Guinness v. United States

    73 F. Supp. 119 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 7, 1947

    In New York, the Board of Directors of Standard Utilities Corporation, which owned the stock the sale of which is here involved, met at 1:30 p. m. on January 7, 1930, and adopted two resolutions, one authorizing the partnership … We think we are bound to come to this conclusion by the Supreme Court’s decision in Commissioner v. Court Holding Company, 324 U.S. 331 , 65 S.Ct. 707 , 89 L.Ed. 981 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dancy v. United States

    668 F.2d 1224 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1982

    See also Carey v. … See also Provancial v. United States, 454 F.2d 72 (8th Cir. 1972); Hejl v. United States, 449 F.2d 124 (5th Cir. 1971); Gordon B. Ball, Inc. v. United States, 461 F. Supp. 311 (D. Nev. 1978); Muldez v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Burton & Co. v. United States

    51 Ct. Cl. 362 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1916

    Differences of opinion arose, a board of engineers was appointed to investigate and recommend, and the board concluded that filling should be placed behind the lock walls at once, the condition of the lock gates rendered … Camden Iron Works v. United States, 50 C. Cls., 191 , and cases cited.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leung v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    23 Cl. Ct. 217 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1991

    Brown v. Secretary DHHS, 920 F.2d 918 (Fed.Cir.1990); Hines v. Secretary DHHS, 21 Cl.Ct. 634 (1990). Under this standard of review, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the special master. Fricano v. … Ruben v. Secretary DHHS, 22 Cl.Ct. 264, 265-267 (1991); Huber v. Secretary DHHS, 22 Cl.Ct. 255, 258 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Prevado Village Partnership v. United States

    31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,398 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 22, 1983

    Plaintiff contends that this expectancy is a constitutionally protected private property right under the “legitimate claim to entitlement” definition in Board of Regents v. … Sun Oil Co. v. United States, 215 Ct.Cl. 716, 770 , 572 F.2d 786, 818 (1978); see J.J. Henry Co. v. United States, 188 Ct.Cl. 39, 46 , 411 F.2d 1246, 1249 (1969). . Plaintiff principally relies in Board of Regents v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Gerlach Live Stock Co. v. United States

    76 F. Supp. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1948

    Hurley v. … The State of California also appointed a similar board. It found a difference of $8.75 an acre.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.