Case law

Littauer v. United States

63 Ct. Cl. 112 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1927

Preis & Company v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 81, 86 , relied upon by the defendant, is not in point. … This is in conformity with the finding of the Contract Adjustment Board, whose opinion shows a very careful consideration of all the facts and of the questions of law involved.

Schiff v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 249 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 19, 1991

v. … United States v.

Ellison v. United States

25 Cl. Ct. 481 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 13, 1992

See, Spaulding v. … He was chair of the Career Development Board, the panel within the USMS which considered Ms. Ellison’s promotion.

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

87 F. Supp. 769 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 3, 1950

Singer concedes that under the doctrine of McLaughlin v. Pacific Lumber Co., 293 U. … Federal Export Corp. v. U. S., 88 C. Cls. 60 , 85-86, certiorari denied 308 U. S. 590 ; Swift and Co. v. U. S., 69 C. Cls. 171 ; Wilson and Co. v. U. S., 82 C. Cls. 261 .

Artis v. United States

506 F.2d 1387 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1974

In Noyd v. … Gusik v.

Calfon Construction, Inc. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,651 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 6, 1989

In Blake Construction Co., Inc. v. United States, 57-1 B.C.A. … Corp. v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 339 , 325 F.2d 451 (1963). Plaintiff discusses several cases in support of its position. In Hol-Gar Mfg. Corp. v.

SNAKE OR PIUTE INDIANS, ETC. v. United States

112 F. Supp. 543 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1953

National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , and National Labor Relations Board v. Pitts burgh S. S. … Co. v.

Gordon Woodroffe Corp. v. United States

104 F. Supp. 984 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1952

The telephone connection was very bad, but Walsh did hear Gillmor say that the Board of Directors of the Athens Piraeus Electricity Company, Limited, had decided to purchase the unit, subject to inspection. … See Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380, 384 ; G. S. Kincaid v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 257, 287-288 .

Hageny v. United States

570 F.2d 924 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1978

These negotiations generally centered on the price per timber cord or thousand board feet (MBF) to be paid for timber cut and removed from the sale area. … Estate of Ridgely v.

MacArthur Mining Co. v. United States

167 Ct. Cl. 143 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

Ann Arbor Construction Co. v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 244 , 126 F. Supp. 161 (1954); Zadeh v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 650 , 111 F. Supp. 248 (1953). … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957); Barnes v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 321 (1963); Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947). Newman v. United States, 143 Ct.

Equipment, Inc. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,427 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1982

Corp. v. … See Bay Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 38 Tax Ct. 535, 546-48 (1962).] . See Appendices A., B., and C. .

Battelle v. United States

8 Ct. Cl. 295 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1872

And, therefore, we allowed 3 cents per pound additional to the contract price for the cattle supplied to General Frémont’s army, and the contract price of V¿ cents for those shown to have been delivered on the eastern side … that in the settlement made with Captain Mackenzie it was arranged between the parties that the price specified in the written contract should be paid to the petitioners then, and the extra allowance to be made left to the board

Adler Construction Co. v. United States

199 Ct. Cl. 809 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 24, 1972

of unliquidated damages,” over which the Board had no jurisdiction. *857 93. … However, as a result of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Glidden Co. v.

HNV Central River Front Corp. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,289 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 31, 1992

HNV and CCC also cite various Board of Contract Appeals (“BCA”) decisions. 3 Board of Contract Appeal decisions do not bind this court. … See Cities Service Co. v. Derby & Co., 654 F.Supp. 492, 502 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (citing Mange v. Unicom Press, 129 F.Supp. 727, 729 (S.D.N.Y.1955) and M. De Matteo Construction Co. v.

Forward Communications Corp. v. United States

608 F.2d 485 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1979

Plaintiffs board approved the prospective termination of the CBS affiliation on condition that its officers could obtain from ABC the acceptable contract that they had tentatively negotiated. … Meredith Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 1 , 405 F.2d 1214 (1968); Roy H. Park Broadcasting, Inc. v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 784 (1971); Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp. v. United States, 204 Ct.

McGrew Bros. Sawmill

27 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,577 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1980

The contract provides for a price per thousand board feet of merchantable timber removed from contract designated areas rather than a lump sum price for all designated timber whatever its volume or grade. … Tapper & Assoc. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 27, 34 , 602 F.2d 311, 315 (1979); Thanet Corp. v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 75, 82 , 591 F.2d 629, 633 (1979); Bradley v. United States, 213 Ct.

Augenblick v. United States

509 F.2d 1157 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1975

The ruling was across the board. Gosa v. Mayden is sufficient to dispose of plaintiff’s claim that he is entitled to the coverage of O'Callahan v. Parker. … H In Parker v. Levy, supra, and Secretary of the Navy v.

Incorporated Trustees of the Gospel Worker Society v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 308 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 13, 1984

Because of the decision in The Incorporated Trustees Of The Gospel Worker Society v. … In Rowan Cos., Inc. v.

Frucht v. United States

49 Ct. Cl. 570 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1914

Such aid or executive shall, while executing the orders of the commanding officer on board the vessel or at the station, take precedence over all officers attached to the vessel or station. … In the case of Miller v. United States, 208 U.

Power v. United States

531 F.2d 505 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1976

Peters v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 63 , 408 F. 2d 719 (1969); Powers v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 626 (1965); Harrington v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1110 (1966); Greenway v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 72 (1963). … Birnholz v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 532 (1972); Cook v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 438 (1964); Dulcy v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 153 , 284 F. 2d 687 (1960).