Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

3.94s

  • Dugan & McNamara, Inc. v. United States

    124 F. Supp. 650 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1954

    United States v. … Pettibone v. United States, 148 U. S. 197 ; United States v. Hutto, 256 U. S. 524 ; United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, supra; United States v. Winner, 28 F. 2d 295 ; United States v. Brown, 6 F. Supp. 331 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Seery v. United States

    127 F. Supp. 601 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1955

    It cites Green v. … In Hannevig v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Golder v. United States

    15 Cl. Ct. 513 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 19, 1988

    Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31 , aff'd 741 F.2d 1374 (Fed.Cir.1984). … Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2553 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Weide v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Littauer v. United States

    63 Ct. Cl. 112 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1927

    Preis & Company v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 81, 86 , relied upon by the defendant, is not in point. … This is in conformity with the finding of the Contract Adjustment Board, whose opinion shows a very careful consideration of all the facts and of the questions of law involved.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frucht v. United States

    49 Ct. Cl. 570 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1914

    Such aid or executive shall, while executing the orders of the commanding officer on board the vessel or at the station, take precedence over all officers attached to the vessel or station. … In the case of Miller v. United States, 208 U.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Onan Corp. v. United States

    19 Cl. Ct. 678 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 8, 1990

    In support of its argument, plaintiff cites the case of United States v. … United States v. Heffner, 420 F.2d 809 (4th Cir.1969).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mobley ex rel. Mobley v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    22 Cl. Ct. 423 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1991

    Brown v. Secretary DHHS, 920 F.2d 918 (Fed.Cir.1990); Hines v. Secretary DHHS, 21 Cl.Ct. 634 (1990). Under this standard of review, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the special master. Id. … Bunting v. Secretary DHHS, 19 Cl.Ct. 738, 752 (1990). The special master found that Mrs.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Georgia Hardwood Lumber Co. v. United States

    78 F. Supp. 808 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1948

    Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. … In Know v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gordon Woodroffe Corp. v. United States

    104 F. Supp. 984 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1952

    The telephone connection was very bad, but Walsh did hear Gillmor say that the Board of Directors of the Athens Piraeus Electricity Company, Limited, had decided to purchase the unit, subject to inspection. … See Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380, 384 ; G. S. Kincaid v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 257, 287-288 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harrison Property Management Co. v. United States

    475 F.2d 623 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1973

    National Carbide Corp. v. Commissioner, supra, 336 U.S. at 433-434 , 69 S.Ct. 71 ; Tomlinson v. Miles, supra, 316 F.2d at 714 ; Carver v. United States, supra, 412 F.2d at 239 , 188 Ct.Cl. at 212-213 . … In Paymer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boyd Lumber Corp. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,728 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 14, 1984

    Algernon Blair Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. T.V.A., 552 F.Supp. 972 (M.D.Ala.1982); Damsky v. Zavatt, 289 F.2d 46, 51 (2nd Cir.1961). … National Electric Coil v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 595 (1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Thayer-West Point Hotel Co. v. United States

    64 F. Supp. 565 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1946

    twenty-five percent (25%) upon production of a card signed by the Adjutant of the Post or such other officer as may be designated by the Superintendent representing the bearer to be entitled thereto as follows: (a) The Board … Phelps v. United States, 274 U. S. 341, 344 . Both statute and contract expressly provide for the payment of “just compensation.”

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hyman v. United States

    157 F. Supp. 164 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

    On February 7, 1955, the chairman of the Board of Appeals and Review, on behalf of the Commissioners, reversed the decision of the Appeals Examining Office and recommended that plaintiff’s “appointment be effected, retroactive … employees shall be released in accordance with Civil Service Commission regulations which shall give due effect to tenure of employment, military preference, length of service, and efficiency ratings: * * Compare Eberlein v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. United States

    131 Ct. Cl. 711 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1955

    On April 7, 1942, Headquarters, First Army Corps, Columbia, South Carolina, sent the following telegram to the Commandant, Carolina Maneuver Area, Fort Jackson, South Carolina: NET OX 3 V 4QT GR 39 HQ I AEMT CORPS COLUMBIA … Under the provisions of the Army Air Forces Regulation No. 50-7 * * * the following-named officers are appointed as members of a board * * *: Captain James E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Henry v. United States

    180 F. Supp. 597 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1960

    In Raffold Process Corp. v. … See also Bingham v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 105 F.2d 971 and Cushman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Groves v. United States

    202 Ct. Cl. 660 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1973

    The Planning Board of the town of North Castle conditionally approved Wiltshire’s application for subdivision of parcel II on June 12,1967, subject to compliance with 11 conditions set out by the Board. … Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lewis

    618 F.2d 119 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1979

    Plaintiff appealed the FEAA decision to the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Review (CSC BAR), which also denied the appeal on the grounds that it was untimely. … Grower v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 337, 343 (1973); Peters v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 63 , 408 F. 2d 719 (1969).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston v. United States

    37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,255 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1992

    See, Triax Co. v. … In Christie-Willamette, 85-1 B.C.A. para. 17,930 (NASA BCA 1985 ), the board considered that the contractor could not credibly deny that he had certified the claims in the event fraud was raised.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bander v. United States

    158 F. Supp. 564 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1958

    On Juñe 1, 1956, the Commission, through its Board of Appeals and Review, ruled that he was not entitled to the benefits of section 14 of the act and finally declined to accept his appeal. … Kirkpatrick v. Gray, 91 U. S. App. D. C. 138, 198 F. 2d 533 , cert. denied,, 344 U. S. 880 (1952); Kohlberg v. Gray, 93 U. S. App. D. C. 97, 207 F. 2d 35 (1953), cert. denied, 346 U. S. 937 (1954).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Maryland Steel Co. v. United States

    48 Ct. Cl. 50 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1912

    Slater v. Emer son, 19 How., 224 . … Co. v. Iron Co., 93 Fed. R,., 408; Davis v. Roberts, 89 Ala., 402 ; Barnard v. McLeod, 114 Mich., 73 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.