Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
1.51s
Oregon Forest Fire Ass'n v. United States
170 Ct. Cl. 308 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965
Tan v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 662, 664 , 10 F. Supp. 552 , 553 (1952); Moriarity, Inc. v. United States, 97 Ct. Cl. 338, 339 , (1942); Cohen, Goldman & Co. v. United States, 77 Ct. … Cl. 713 , 730, cert. denied, 290 U.S. 681 (1933); Withers v. United States, 69 Ct. Cl. 584 (1930); Howard University v. United States, 126 F. 2d 6, 9 (D.C. Cir. 1941); *318 American Eastman Corp v. United States, 133 F.
Cited 4 timesPublishedStokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. United States
21 Cl. Ct. 731 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 2, 1990
Stokely III (president, and chief operations officer, or, chairman of the board and chief executive officer), Leonard J. Delehanty (vice chairman of the board and chief administrative officer), and K.M. Eberts, Jr. … See Markham & Brown Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished112 F. Supp. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1953
Barling v. United States, No. 49190 C. Cls., decided May 5, 1953. … The Secretary of War may, in his discretion, designate an individual, or individuals, other than .the Contracting Officer, or a board as his authorized. representative to determine appeals under this article.- * * * 1-31.
Cited 18 timesPublished149 F. Supp. 199 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957
McElrath v. United States, 102 U. S. 426 ; United States v. Burchard, 125 U. S. 176 ; Wisconsin Central Railroad Company v. United States, 164 U. S. 190 . … In Moreno v. United States, 118 C.
Cited 3 timesPublished688 F.2d 784 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 8, 1982
Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270, 273-74 (1957); Nager Electric Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 234, 249 , 368 F.2d 847, 857 (1966). … The Supreme Court vacated the decision for reconsideration in light of Board of Regents v.
Cited 36 timesPublished12 Cl. Ct. 694 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1987
Two days before July 10, 1981, the date set for the sale, Heagy’s attorney informed HUD Loan Specialist Patricia Brown that Alaska Housing Finance Corporation had refused financing. … Instead he relies on United States v. Golden Acres, Inc., 520 F.Supp. 1073 (D.Del.1981), and Kent Farm Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished21 Ct. Cl. 340 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1886
Justice Moore delivered in the case of Bass v. … (De Bode v. The Queen, 3 Clarke’s House of Lords, 464.)
Cited 32 timesPublishedHercules Powder Company v. United States
180 F. Supp. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1960
On December 9, 1948, the plaintiff’s board of directors voted a year end “B” bonus of $2,233,133 to certain of its employees who had been recommended by their superiors. … The problem of whether a corporation’ makes a profit, in a real sense, or in a tax sense, by dealing in its own shares, has been thoroughly discussed in the opinion of this court in the case of Anderson, Clayton & Co. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDiebold, Inc. v. United States
16 Cl. Ct. 193 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1989
Schwabenbauer v. Board of Education, 667 F.2d 305, 313-14 (2d Cir.1981). Mere denials or conclusory statements, however, are not sufficient to create an evidentiary conflict. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. … Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 204 , 54 S.Ct. 356, 361 , 78 L.Ed. 725 (1934); Southern Pac. Transp., 75 T.C. at 681 .
Cited 21 timesPublished176 Ct. Cl. 831 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966
Sakran v. Macy, supra. … Dismuke v. United States, 297 U.S. 167 (1936).
Cited 2 timesPublished618 F.2d 120 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 30, 1979
Plaintiff then filed a petition with the Appeals Review Board (ARB) requesting his case be reopened on the basis of newly discovered evidence. … Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 27 , 515 F.2d 1397 (1975).
Cited 0 timesPublished68 Ct. Cl. 727 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1930
Section 6, 32 Stat. 101 , of the act of April 12, 1902, applicable to the Eevenue Cutter Sendee, and made applicable to the Coast Guard by section 3 of the act of January 28, 1915, 38 Stat. 802 , provides: “ That when a board … In United States v. Moore, 95 U.
Cited 1 timesPublished102 F. Supp. 987 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1952
Justice Minton, then a judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, said in Bowles v. … Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 288 U. S. 294, 325 , 53 S. Ct. 350 , 77 L. Ed. 796 ; Bowles v. Nu Way Laundry Company, 10 Cir., 144 F. 2d 741 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedErie Basin Metal Products, Inc. v. United States
109 F. Supp. 402 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953
Roads Co., v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 48 , and cases there cited. … Nor do we think that the Appeal Board, Office of Contract Settlement, intended to hold differently in the case cited by plaintiffs, Ohio Cashet Hardware Co., Inc., d/h/a Allen Tool & Mfg. Co., v. War Department, 1 App.
Cited 1 timesPublished128 F. Supp. 400 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955
United States v. Symonds, 120 U. S. 46 ; Glavey v. United States, 182 U. S. 595 ; Williamson v. United States, 207 U. S. 425 ; United States v. Smull, 236 U. S. 405 ; United States v. George, 228 U. … S. 14 ; United States v. United Verde Copper Co., 196 U. S. 207 ; United States v. Morehead, 243 U. S. 607 ; Blackett v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 884 ; Wickes Corporation v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 741 ; Hobby V.
Cited 7 timesPublished3 Cl. Ct. 55 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1983
Slodov v. United States, 436 U.S. at 249-250 , 98 S.Ct. at 1786-1787 ; Gutman v. United States, 79-2 USTC ¶ 9598 , at 88177, aff’d per curiam 222 Ct.Cl. 537 , 618 F.2d 125 (1979). . Bolding v. … Burack v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 855 . 461 F.2d 1282 (1972); Scott v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 650 , 354 F.2d 292 (1965).
Cited 0 timesPublishedVirginia Engineering Co. v. United States
89 Ct. Cl. 457 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1939
S. 61 ; John Russell Smith v. United States, 67 C. Cls. 182, 210 ; Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 59 ; Sea-board Air Line Ry. v. United States, 261 U. S. 299, 306 ; and William Wrigley, Jr. v. … S. 440, 444 ; United States v. Mooney, 116 U. S. 104, 106 ; Kepner v. *473 United States, 195 U. S. 100, 124 ; United States v. Merriam, 263 U. S. 179, 187 ; and Hecht v. Malley, 265 U. S. 144, 153 .
Cited 3 timesPublished135 Ct. Cl. 890 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956
vessels boarded. … Brown v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 52 , and Ostroot v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 57 . 56 Stat. 1068 . 57 Stat. 75 . The highway was connected across the river by a ferry during the summer.
Cited 4 timesPublished25 F. Supp. 580 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1938
The application was finally rejected by the Primary Examiner, and the plaintiff appealed to what is now the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office. … This case is not similar in principle to the case of Tilghman v. Proctor, 102 U. S. 107 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedSNAKE OR PIUTE INDIANS, ETC. v. United States
112 F. Supp. 543 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1953
National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , and National Labor Relations Board v. Pitts burgh S. S. … Co. v.
Cited 27 timesPublished
Ask Donna