Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

1.51s

  • Oregon Forest Fire Ass'n v. United States

    170 Ct. Cl. 308 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965

    Tan v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 662, 664 , 10 F. Supp. 552 , 553 (1952); Moriarity, Inc. v. United States, 97 Ct. Cl. 338, 339 , (1942); Cohen, Goldman & Co. v. United States, 77 Ct. … Cl. 713 , 730, cert. denied, 290 U.S. 681 (1933); Withers v. United States, 69 Ct. Cl. 584 (1930); Howard University v. United States, 126 F. 2d 6, 9 (D.C. Cir. 1941); *318 American Eastman Corp v. United States, 133 F.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. United States

    21 Cl. Ct. 731 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 2, 1990

    Stokely III (president, and chief operations officer, or, chairman of the board and chief executive officer), Leonard J. Delehanty (vice chairman of the board and chief administrative officer), and K.M. Eberts, Jr. … See Markham & Brown Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Torres v. United States

    112 F. Supp. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1953

    Barling v. United States, No. 49190 C. Cls., decided May 5, 1953. … The Secretary of War may, in his discretion, designate an individual, or individuals, other than .the Contracting Officer, or a board as his authorized. representative to determine appeals under this article.- * * * 1-31.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. United States

    149 F. Supp. 199 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

    McElrath v. United States, 102 U. S. 426 ; United States v. Burchard, 125 U. S. 176 ; Wisconsin Central Railroad Company v. United States, 164 U. S. 190 . … In Moreno v. United States, 118 C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lins v. United States

    688 F.2d 784 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 8, 1982

    Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270, 273-74 (1957); Nager Electric Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 234, 249 , 368 F.2d 847, 857 (1966). … The Supreme Court vacated the decision for reconsideration in light of Board of Regents v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Heagy v. United States

    12 Cl. Ct. 694 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1987

    Two days before July 10, 1981, the date set for the sale, Heagy’s attorney informed HUD Loan Specialist Patricia Brown that Alaska Housing Finance Corporation had refused financing. … Instead he relies on United States v. Golden Acres, Inc., 520 F.Supp. 1073 (D.Del.1981), and Kent Farm Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gray v. United States

    21 Ct. Cl. 340 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1886

    Justice Moore delivered in the case of Bass v. … (De Bode v. The Queen, 3 Clarke’s House of Lords, 464.)

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Hercules Powder Company v. United States

    180 F. Supp. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1960

    On December 9, 1948, the plaintiff’s board of directors voted a year end “B” bonus of $2,233,133 to certain of its employees who had been recommended by their superiors. … The problem of whether a corporation’ makes a profit, in a real sense, or in a tax sense, by dealing in its own shares, has been thoroughly discussed in the opinion of this court in the case of Anderson, Clayton & Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Diebold, Inc. v. United States

    16 Cl. Ct. 193 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1989

    Schwabenbauer v. Board of Education, 667 F.2d 305, 313-14 (2d Cir.1981). Mere denials or conclusory statements, however, are not sufficient to create an evidentiary conflict. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. … Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 204 , 54 S.Ct. 356, 361 , 78 L.Ed. 725 (1934); Southern Pac. Transp., 75 T.C. at 681 .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Sakran v. United States

    176 Ct. Cl. 831 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

    Sakran v. Macy, supra. … Dismuke v. United States, 297 U.S. 167 (1936).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pao

    618 F.2d 120 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 30, 1979

    Plaintiff then filed a petition with the Appeals Review Board (ARB) requesting his case be reopened on the basis of newly discovered evidence. … Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 27 , 515 F.2d 1397 (1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. United States

    68 Ct. Cl. 727 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1930

    Section 6, 32 Stat. 101 , of the act of April 12, 1902, applicable to the Eevenue Cutter Sendee, and made applicable to the Coast Guard by section 3 of the act of January 28, 1915, 38 Stat. 802 , provides: “ That when a board … In United States v. Moore, 95 U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Armour & Co. v. United States

    102 F. Supp. 987 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1952

    Justice Minton, then a judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, said in Bowles v. … Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 288 U. S. 294, 325 , 53 S. Ct. 350 , 77 L. Ed. 796 ; Bowles v. Nu Way Laundry Company, 10 Cir., 144 F. 2d 741 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Erie Basin Metal Products, Inc. v. United States

    109 F. Supp. 402 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953

    Roads Co., v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 48 , and cases there cited. … Nor do we think that the Appeal Board, Office of Contract Settlement, intended to hold differently in the case cited by plaintiffs, Ohio Cashet Hardware Co., Inc., d/h/a Allen Tool & Mfg. Co., v. War Department, 1 App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seagrave v. United States

    128 F. Supp. 400 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

    United States v. Symonds, 120 U. S. 46 ; Glavey v. United States, 182 U. S. 595 ; Williamson v. United States, 207 U. S. 425 ; United States v. Smull, 236 U. S. 405 ; United States v. George, 228 U. … S. 14 ; United States v. United Verde Copper Co., 196 U. S. 207 ; United States v. Morehead, 243 U. S. 607 ; Blackett v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 884 ; Wickes Corporation v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 741 ; Hobby V.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wilkinson v. United States

    3 Cl. Ct. 55 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1983

    Slodov v. United States, 436 U.S. at 249-250 , 98 S.Ct. at 1786-1787 ; Gutman v. United States, 79-2 USTC ¶ 9598 , at 88177, aff’d per curiam 222 Ct.Cl. 537 , 618 F.2d 125 (1979). . Bolding v. … Burack v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 855 . 461 F.2d 1282 (1972); Scott v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 650 , 354 F.2d 292 (1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Virginia Engineering Co. v. United States

    89 Ct. Cl. 457 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1939

    S. 61 ; John Russell Smith v. United States, 67 C. Cls. 182, 210 ; Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 59 ; Sea-board Air Line Ry. v. United States, 261 U. S. 299, 306 ; and William Wrigley, Jr. v. … S. 440, 444 ; United States v. Mooney, 116 U. S. 104, 106 ; Kepner v. *473 United States, 195 U. S. 100, 124 ; United States v. Merriam, 263 U. S. 179, 187 ; and Hecht v. Malley, 265 U. S. 144, 153 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Schaible v. United States

    135 Ct. Cl. 890 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

    vessels boarded. … Brown v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 52 , and Ostroot v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 57 . 56 Stat. 1068 . 57 Stat. 75 . The highway was connected across the river by a ferry during the summer.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Morse v. United States

    25 F. Supp. 580 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1938

    The application was finally rejected by the Primary Examiner, and the plaintiff appealed to what is now the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office. … This case is not similar in principle to the case of Tilghman v. Proctor, 102 U. S. 107 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SNAKE OR PIUTE INDIANS, ETC. v. United States

    112 F. Supp. 543 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1953

    National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , and National Labor Relations Board v. Pitts burgh S. S. … Co. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.