Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

2.51s

  • Canton Cotton Mills v. United States

    94 F. Supp. 561 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1951

    Defendant relies on Welch v. … Old Colony Trust Associates v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. United States

    8 Cl. Ct. 129 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1985

    The responses were evaluated by the NIH Inventions and Patents Board in a meeting held June 10, 1977, wherein the Board determined that, of all the applicants for a nonexclusive license, only Ohio-Nuclear appeared firmly … See also Willems Industries, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sudametal Sociedad Anonima Sud Americana De Metales y Minerales v. United States

    90 F. Supp. 551 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950

    Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States, 148 U. S. 312 ; United States v. New River Collieries Co., 262 U. S. 341 ; Davis v. Newton Coal Co., 267 U. S. 292, 301 . … A. v. The United States, 109 C. Cls. 535 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wells v. United States

    64 F. Supp. 476 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1946

    In support of that action counsel for defendant here rely upon the cases of Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 , 51 S.Ct. 150 , 75 L.Ed. 383 ; North American Oil Consolidated v. … Burnet, 286 U.S. 417 , 52 S.Ct. 613 , 76 L.Ed. 1197 ; Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 , and Jacobs v. Hoey, 2 Cir., 136 F.2d 954 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • International Harvester Co. v. United States

    169 Ct. Cl. 821 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1965

    Colton v. Colton, 127 U.S. 300, 310 (1888) ; Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. et al. v. Des Moines Union Railway Co. et al., 254 U.S. 196 , 208 (1920); Mahafey v. … As was stated by Chief Judge Cardozo in Meinhard v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Collins

    220 Ct. Cl. 661 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1979

    Subsequent efforts by plaintiff to have the decision set aside by the Appeals Review Board of the Civil Service Commission were unsuccessful. … See Bendure v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 633 , 554 F. 2d 427 (1977).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Coastal Cargo Co. v. United States

    351 F.2d 1004 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1965

    See also Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 465, 472 , 325 F. 2d 446 (1963); Nesbitt v. United States, supra, footnote 6. … Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, supra, p. 472. Cf. Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 802, 808 , 337 F. 2d 861 (1963).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. United States

    512 F.2d 1094 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

    Padbloc Company v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 369, 376-77 (1963); Deloro Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 489, 496-97 , 317 F. 2d 382, 387 (1963). … United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co., 329 U.S. 585 (1947).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Metal Moulding Co. v. United States

    76 Ct. Cl. 194 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1932

    In the case of Powder Company v. … Pierce v. Schenck, 3 Hill (N.Y.), 28; Norton v. Woodruff, 2 N.Y. 153 ; Mallory v. Willis, 4 id, 76; Foster v. Pettibone, 7 id. 433.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Christie v. United States

    48 Ct. Cl. 293 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1913

    (Bishop on Frauds, 29; Schuchardt v. Allen, 1 Wall., 359, 368 ; Shippen v. Brown, 122 U. S., 595 .) … (Bishop on Frauds, 71 ; Wannell v. Kem, 57 Mo., 478 ; Wylder v. DeCon, 18 Minn., 470 ; Webster v. Bailey, 31 Mich., 36 ; Roseman v. Howland, 43 Cal., 111 .) In Rawlins v. Wickham (Law Jour. 28, N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ceballos v. United States

    42 Ct. Cl. 318 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 22, 1907

    Defendants cite Clark v. United States, 95 U. S., 539 ; Salomon v. United States, 19 Wall., 17 ; South Boston Iron Co. v. Same, 118 U. S., 42 ; 18 C. Cls. … Lords Hay Co. v. United States, 191 U. S., 163 .) In that case the court cited the leading case of Ciarle, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co. v. United States

    73 Ct. Cl. 447 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1932

    V $ »! … In United States v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Corporation Argentina de Productores de Carnes v. United States

    115 Ct. Cl. 679 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1950

    .: In this suit the plaintiff, an Argentine corporation, seeks to recover from the United States payment for approximately 2,000 tons of lamb carcasses and lamb cuts purchased by the United v States Department of Agriculture … The general manager of the plaintiff corporation and a member of its Board of Directors had come to the United *708 States in February 1941 for the purpose of doing everything possible to obtain a favorable decision on the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Welsh v. United States

    2 Cl. Ct. 417 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1983

    Even if vested, the options could not be exercised if plaintiff left his employment with SWI, unless the board of directors determined that his departure was in the best interests of the company. … See C’de Baca v. Commissioner, 326 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1964); Farber v. Commissioner, 36 T.C. 1142 (1961), aff’d on other grounds, 312 F.2d 729 (2nd Cir. 1963). In the third case, Mamula v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brammer v. United States

    24 Cl. Ct. 487 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 21, 1991

    In Bonner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 781 F.2d 202 (Fed.Cir.1986), (employee reassigned by RIF) the Federal Circuit outlined a two-part test. … Bonner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 781 F.2d 202, 204 (Fed.Cir.1986).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. United States

    585 F.2d 988 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1978

    The Federal Reserve Board requires plaintiff to use the accrual method of accounting for interest income for financial reporting purposes. … plaintiff consistently has reported its prepaid interest on the regular accrual accounting method for many years, and the fact that the plaintiff was required to use the accrual method of accounting by the Federal Reserve Board

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hebah v. United States

    456 F.2d 696 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972

    v. … And, as Justice Holmes said in Brown v. United States, supra, “Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife.”

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Utica Knitting Co. v. United States

    68 Ct. Cl. 77 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1929

    In June, 1915, the board of directors of the Unitee Knitwear Company resolved that the company should go into liquidation. … Gulf Oil Corporation v. Lewellyn, 248 U. S. 71 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Beckwith v. United States

    38 Ct. Cl. 295 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1903

    of engineers for fortifications and for river and harbor improvements whether any changes are demanded for reasons of safety or economy in the method of lining said tunnel heretofore adopted and pursued; ” and as said board … throughout in accordance with the following: “ Specifications for nJMe side walls. — The rubble side walls provided for in these articles will be constructed of clean, sound, and durable stone, selected for the purpose; the;v

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Realty Associates, Inc. v. United States

    138 F. Supp. 875 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1956

    138 F.Supp. 875 (1956) REALTY ASSOCIATES, Inc., a corporation, v. The UNITED STATES. No. 582-52. United States Court of Claims. March 6, 1956. *876 Russell Morton Brown, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Robert T. … Crystal Concrete Corp. v. Town of Braintree, 309 Mass. 463 , 35 N.E.2d 672, 675 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.