Case law

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States

52 Ct. Cl. 338 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 23, 1917

Scott v. B. & O. R. R., 93 Md., 475, 505 ; Garby v. Harris, 7 Exch., 591, 21, L. J., 160; United States v. Fisk, 3 Wall., 445 ; Oates v. National Bank, 100 U. … In United States v.

Boggs v. United States

44 Ct. Cl. 367 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1909

In United States v. … R., 452 ; Malone v. United States, 5 C. Cls. R., 486 ; Howell v. United States, 7 C. Cls. R., 512 ; Hobbs v. United States, 17 C. Cls. R., 189 ; Stevens v. United States, 41 C. Cls. R., 344 ; and Penrose v.

FDL Technologies, Inc. v. United States

38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,378 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 28, 1992

FDL Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 967 F.2d 1578 (Fed.Cir.1992). … On May 14, 1990, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “ASBCA”) sustained FDL’s appeal of the termination of Contract No.

Merchants' National Bank v. United States

42 Ct. Cl. 6 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1906

(Endlich on Interpretation of Statutes, sec. 86, p. 115; United States v. Moore, 95 U. S., 760 .) In Smythe v. … Justice Brown, in Hamilton v. Rathbone ( 175 U.

Capital Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,830 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1990

See, e.g., Lehman v. Nakshian, 453 U.S. 156, 160 , 101 S.Ct. 2698, 2701 , 69 L.Ed.2d 548 (1981); Galloway v. United States, 319 U.S. 372, 388 , 63 S.Ct. 1077, 1086 , 87 L.Ed. 1458 (1943); United States v. … See also Brown v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 768, 785 , 524 F.2d 693, 703 (1975) (Court of Claims has jurisdiction over government’s FCA counterclaim); Frantz Equip. Co. v.

Van Wagenen v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 110 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 23, 1889

Van Wagenen, administrator, v. The United States, that said Yan Wagenen and his' counsel produce all papers in their x>ossession having relation to the ship Ganges, its cargo, and voyage.” … Brown, administrator, in the above-entitled cause.

Welsh v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 417 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1983

Even if vested, the options could not be exercised if plaintiff left his employment with SWI, unless the board of directors determined that his departure was in the best interests of the company. … See C’de Baca v. Commissioner, 326 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1964); Farber v. Commissioner, 36 T.C. 1142 (1961), aff’d on other grounds, 312 F.2d 729 (2nd Cir. 1963). In the third case, Mamula v.

Fritz Kyer v. The United States

369 F.2d 714 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1966

Christian & Associates v. United States, 312 F.2d 418, 425 , 160 Ct.Cl. 1, 14 , cert. denied, 375 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 444 , 11 L.Ed.2d 314 (1963). … Section 990.76 of these regulations states: “No member or alternate member of the committee or board, nor any employee, representative, or agent of the committee shall be held personally responsible, either individually,

Flensburger Dampfercompagnie v. United States

59 F.2d 464 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1932

United States v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 142 U. S. 615 , 12 S. Ct. 306 , 35 L. Ed. 1134 ; United States v. Tanner, 147 U. S. 661 , 13 S. Ct. 436 , 37 L. Ed. 321 ; United States v. Healey, 160 U. S. 136 , 16 S. … Miner v. Reardon, 120 Kan. 614 , 245 P. 158 , 47 A. L. R. 452; Ex parte Newman, 14 Wall. 152 , 20 L. Ed. 877 ; United States v. Diekelman, 92 U. S. 520, 530 , 23 L. Ed. 742 ; North German Lloyd S. S. Co. v. Hedden (C.

J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United States

347 F.2d 235 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

The Board upheld the contracting officer’s determination. … We need not decide this issue since we find that insofar as the decision of the Appeals Board involved factual issues within the “Disputes” clause, the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and is, therefore

Huffine v. United States

25 Cl. Ct. 462 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 23, 1992

See Sweats Fashions v. … Pannill Knitting Company, 833 F.2d 1560, 1566 (Fed.Cir.1987) (board erred in granting summary judgment without affording plaintiff opportunity to pursue discovery); Duncan Donuts of America, Inc. v.

Beckwith v. United States

38 Ct. Cl. 295 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1903

of engineers for fortifications and for river and harbor improvements whether any changes are demanded for reasons of safety or economy in the method of lining said tunnel heretofore adopted and pursued; ” and as said board … throughout in accordance with the following: “ Specifications for nJMe side walls. — The rubble side walls provided for in these articles will be constructed of clean, sound, and durable stone, selected for the purpose; the;v

Servel, Inc. v. United States

35 F. Supp. 466 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1940

Among the cases supporting the views we have expressed are Rosoff Tunnel Corp. v. Higgins, 28 F. Supp. 880 ; Midvale Paper Board Co. v. United States, 31 F. Supp. 851 ; Stromberg-Carlson Mfg. Co. et al., v. … Supp. 101; Hornell Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. United States 32 Fed. Supp. 468; Mountain Iron Co. v. United States, 31 Fed. Supp. 895.

C. J. Montag & Sons, Inc. v. United States

348 F.2d 954 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

Co. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 478 , 346 F. 2d 962 (1965); Wingate Constr. Co. v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 131 (1964); WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. … Co. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 802 , 337 F. 2d 861 (1963), and later decisions to the same effect.

Leavitt v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 952 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1925

Cls. 190 ; or Jones and Brown's ease, 1 C. Cls. 383 , is not available here. … See in this connection United States v. Spearin, 248 U. S. 132 ; United States v. Behan, 110 U. S. 338 ; United States v. *978 Peck, 102 U. S. 64 ; Houser v. United States, 39 C. Cls. 508 ; Clark v. Morgan Co.

United Engineering & Contracting Co. v. United States

47 Ct. Cl. 489 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 11, 1912

(Dodd v. Churton, 1 Q. B., 562; Kemp v. Rose, 1 Griff., 258.) … (Stewart v. Keteltas, 36 N. Y., 388 ; Weeks v. McCarthy, 89 N. Y., 566 ; Starr v. Mining Co., 13 Pac. Rep., 195 ; Mansfield v. Railroad Co., 6 N. E. Rep., 386; Navigation Co. v. Wilcox, 7 Jones (N. C.), 481; Dumke v.

Castelo v. United States

51 Ct. Cl. 221 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 24, 1916

S., 163 -170; United States v. Berdan Fire Arms Co., 156 Ib., 552; Russell v. United States, 182 Ib., 516; Crozier v. Krupp, 224 Ib., 290; United States v. Société, etc., Ib., 309. … Thomas v. United States, 39 C. Cls., 1 ; Leigh v. United States, 43 C. Cls., 374 . The petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Schremp v. United States

166 F. Supp. 610 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1958

You will be allowed 65 pounds baggage on board Government plane. Under the authority of the Secretary of the Navy. … Regulations, as amended January 30, 1942, he is entitled to reimbursement because under that regulation physical possession of written travel orders prior to travel is not a necessary condition of reimbursement, citing Maskal v.

First Atlas Funding Corp. v. United States

23 Cl. Ct. 137 · United States Court of Claims · May 22, 1991

In O’Brien v. … In Gordon v.

Alaska Freight Lines, Inc. v. The United States

377 F.2d 580 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1967

Railway v. … Mercantile Co. v. Denver & R. G. R. R., 233 U.S. 479 , 34 S.Ct. 641 , 58 L.Ed. 1055 (1914); Texas & N. O. R. R. v. Sabine Tram Co., 227 U.S. 111 , 33 S.Ct. 229 , 57 L.Ed. 442 (1913); Railroad Comm, of Louisiana v.