Case law

Russell v. United States

5 Ct. Cl. 121 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869

There was a full complement of hands on board the boat at the time she was impressed into the service, and they were retained and paid by the claimant; and the other expenses of the boat were also •defrayed by him while she … (Bogart v. The United States, 2 C. Cls. R., 159 ; Mitchell v. Harmony, 13 How., 115 .)

Ryle v. United States

110 Ct. Cl. 657 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1948

In the case of Green v. … Cronin v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 20 ; Arnold v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 43 .

Atlantic Works v. United States

46 Ct. Cl. 57 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1911

referred to the court* An inspection of the proposed measure discloses the complaint of the petitioner to have been for the payment and discharge of its “ claims ” for work done and materials furnished as per report of a board … Wisconsin Central v. United States, 164 U. S., 212 , and authorities there cited.

M. Fine & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. United States

162 F. Supp. 763 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1958

On May 15, 1950, the Supreme Court, decided Brown Shoe Company, Inc., v. Commissioner, 339 U.S. 583 , 70 S.Ct. 820 , 94 L.Ed. 1081 . … Moultrie Cotton Mills v. United States, Ct.Cl., 151 F.Supp. 482 .

Eastern Marine, Inc. v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,491 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1986

Ass’n v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 525, 530 (1985); Cinciarelli v. Reagan, 729 F.2d 801, 804-05 (D.C.Cir.1984); see Russell v. … See Devine v. Sutermeister, 733 F.2d 892, 896-97 (Fed.Cir.1984).

Irving A. Kanarek v. The United States

394 F.2d 525 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1968

Among other things, plaintiff relied on the case of Mendez v. … Graves v. United States, 176 Ct.Cl. 68 (1966); Armand v. United States, 136 Ct.Cl. 339 (1956).

Sonnabend v. United States

175 F. Supp. 150 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1959

Plaintiff appealed to the Civil Service Commission and the Board of Appeals and Eeview, which appeal was denied and which plaintiff asserts was in error. Plaintiff asserts two grounds for recovery. … Hulsart v. United States, 115 C. Cls. 451, 460 . The law is not an end in itself, it is a means to an end. It is a vehicle for reaching the ends of justice.

Elgin Builders, Inc. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,901 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1981

The plaintiff argues that Bein v. United States, 101 Ct. Cl. 144 (1943), is applicable and should be followed. It further asserts the contract was ambiguous and thus must be construed against the Government. … In Bein , the plaintiff contractors were required to pay back charges of the federal government to the Water Board of the City of Detroit before permits would be issued to connect the water supply.

Edward Levy Metals, Inc. v. United States

485 F.2d 603 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1973

We are referred to the con *1003 tract provisions set forth in the margin 2 and to the case of United States v. … exhaust its administrative remedies, the court held that the Government’s course of action constituted an effective waiver of the Government’s contractual right to have the propriety of the default termination reviewed by the Board

Glavey v. United States

35 Ct. Cl. 242 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1900

R., 336 ; see also Dorsey v. Smyth, 28 Cal., 25 ; Stratton v. Oulten, 28 Cal., 51 ; Morton v. Tiernan, 30 Barb., 193 ; Bennett's Case, 19 C. Cls. B,., 388.) … Satterlee v. Board of Police ( 75 N.

Duplantier v. United States

27 Ct. Cl. 323 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 25, 1892

In support of tbe motion for a new trial, we are cited to the case of Dodd v. The United States ( 21 C. Cls. R., 117 ). … This rule thus established continued in force throughout tbe entire period of tbe existence of tbe Commissioners as a board of investigation.

Wright v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 819 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1988

Belford, 417 U.S. 642, 650 , 94 S.Ct. 2431, 2436 , 41 L.Ed.2d 374 (1974) (citing Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 194 , 15 L.Ed. 595 (1856)); United Mine Workers v. … Carruth v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 422, 445 , 627 F.2d 1068, 1081 (1980); Muehlen v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 690 , 690, 529 F.2d 533 (1976); Morgan v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 247, 253 (1987); Bounds v.

Mittry v. United States

73 Ct. Cl. 341 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1931

S. 372 ; Dermott v. Jones, 2 Wall. 1 . In Dermott v. … United States v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., supra. In Peist v.

Sealright-Oswego Falls Corp. v. United States

163 F. Supp. 630 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1958

The only case cited by either party in the briefs is National Grinding Wheel Co. v. Commissioner, 8 T. C. 1278 (1947). This case seems to be inapplicable to the facts of the instant cáse. … All of the plaintiff’s products "are manufactured almost 100 percent from a class of paperboard designated as special food board. 7.

Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. United States

122 F. Supp. 837 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1954

Pedrick, 2 Cir., 148 F.2d 165 , certiorari denied, 326 U.S. 723 , 66 S.Ct. 28 , 90 L.Ed. 428 ; Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 133 F.2d 582 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … Rollins Burdick Hunter Co., 7 Cir., 174 F.2d 698 ; Dow Chemical Co. v. Kavanagh, 6 Cir., 139 F.2d 42 ; Helvering v. Edison Bros.

Fritz Kyer v. The United States

369 F.2d 714 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1966

Christian & Associates v. United States, 312 F.2d 418, 425 , 160 Ct.Cl. 1, 14 , cert. denied, 375 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 444 , 11 L.Ed.2d 314 (1963). … Section 990.76 of these regulations states: “No member or alternate member of the committee or board, nor any employee, representative, or agent of the committee shall be held personally responsible, either individually,

Murray v. United States

46 Ct. Cl. 94 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1911

Brooks v. Railroad Co., 102 U. S., 107 ; Public Schools v. Walker, 9 Wall., 603 ; Brown v. Aspden, 14 How., 25 ; Cameron v. McRoberts, 3 Wheat., 591 ; Sibbald v. United States, 12 Pet., 488 ; Bronson v. Schulten, 104 U. … Jacobs v. Marks, 182 U. S., 583 .

Shryock v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 775 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1981

Petitioner, as a member of a bargaining unit represented by the National Association of Government Employees, had the option of appealing his removal to the Merit Systems Protection Board under 5 U.S.C. §§ 7512 , 7513, 7701 … See McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185 (1969). In Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v.

Knight v. United States

35 Ct. Cl. 129 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 26, 1900

(Wehrman v. Conklin, 155 U. S. R., 314 .) Estoppel is a doctrine not generally favored, but the law recognizes the necessity for its enforcement in many cases. … But even the Government may be estopped of a legal right (Eager v. United States, 33 C. Cls.

Clifford v. United States

34 Ct. Cl. 223 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1899

In the case of Clifford v. … If he enter upon property and cut and carry away timber and saw it into boards and sell the boards the owner may sue for the money had and received.