Case law

Means v. United States

39 F.2d 748 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930

R. 1454], supra, or effected by deed, Keeney v. New York, 222 U. S. 525 , 32 S. Ct. 105 , 56 L. Ed. 299 , 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1139 ; Chanler v. Kelsey [ 205 U. S. 466 , 27 S. Ct. 550 , 51 L. Ed. 882 ], supra; Nickel v. … Brown procured three insurance policies on his life, in each of which his wife was named as benefieiary. He reserved to himself in each policy the right to change beneficiaries.

Naporano Iron & Metal Co. v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 422 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1984

During the years 1973 and 1974, Joe was, in addition to President of the company, the Chairman of its Board of Directors. On June 26,1974, Andrew, Sr. and Andrew, Jr. were named members of the Board of Directors. … Commissioner v.

Moser v. United States

42 Ct. Cl. 86 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 7, 1907

(Leopold v. United States, 18 C. Cls., 546 ; Hawkins v. United States, 40 C. Cls., 110 ; United States v. Redgrave, 116 U. S., 474 , affirming the judgment of this court, 20 C. Cls., 226 . See also 22 Op. Atty. … Though the claimant was subject to be ordered to active duty on board ship or otherwise during his term in the Naval Academy, it does not appear that he was so ordered or that he performed any service other than that required

Gruber v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 222 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1925

Stackhouse, Commander, Senior Member Board of Sale, in full on account of steel awarded the plaintiff by the Navy Department. … In the case of Erie Coal amd Coke Corp. v. United States, *230 decided by the Supreme Court of the United States January 5, 1925, 266 U.

Cherry v. United States

640 F.2d 1184 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1980

Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393 (1961). … Compare Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742, 783-86 (1948); American Power and Light Co. v. SEC, 329 U.S. 90, 105 (1946); Grymes Hill Manor Estates v. United States, 179 Ct.

Edwards v. United States

168 F. Supp. 955 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1958

De-Raef Corporation v. United States, 70 F.Supp. 264 , 108 Ct.Cl. 255, 266 ; Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 715 ; Party Cab Co. v. … United States, 7 Cir., 172 F.2d 87 , 10 A.L.R.2d 358 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Nu-Car Carriers, 3 Cir., 189 F.2d 756 . Restatement of the Law of Agency, §§ 2(3) and 220.

Crygier v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 268 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1890

On the 5th day of July, 1879, he reported for duty on board the ship Marion, on which he served until June 25, 1882, when he was detached and ordered home because *272 of physical disability. … from the 30th of September, 1884, to the 5th of Augnst, 1885, the court is of opinion, that the case in that branch, falls within the law announced by the Supreme Court, in confirmation of this court in the case of Perkins v.

Carchia v. United States

485 F.2d 622 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1973

Co. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 825, 831 (1963); J. E. Robertson Co. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 289, 296-97 , 437 F. 2d 1360, 1364 (1971); Rash v. United States, 175 Ct. … In Anderson v. United States, 97 Ct.

Pete v. United States

531 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1976

Therefore, he felt it would be necessary to completely disassemble each superstructure board by board and then literally rebuild it all over again. Consequently, Mr. … Briggs v. Allegheny County, 369 U.S. 84 (1962). United States v. Welch, 217 U.S. 333 (1910). Eyherabide v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 598 , 345 F. 2d 565 (1965). United States v.

Wilson Line, Inc. v. United States

78 F. Supp. 821 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1948

Co. v. Lucas, 136 Fed. 377 ; Adelphia Hotel Co. v. … Cors. v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 66 . This case set up certain criteria for such determination, although based on rules long ago settled in Kerr v. South Park Commissioners, 117 U. S. 379 (1886); Shoemaker v.

Bernard A. Mitchell and Marjorie Mitchell v. The United States

408 F.2d 435 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

Hochschild v. … The parties cite some decisions of this court: Towanda Textiles, Inc. v. United States, 180 F.Supp. 373 , 149 Ct.Cl. 123 (1960) ; Allied Chemical Corp. v.

Eastern Marine, Inc. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,391 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1984

Frankenhauser, who was both the WPB Acquisition Team Chairman and the Source Evaluation Board (SEB) Chairman, called Campbell. … The proposals, complete with the offerors’ responses to their deficiencies and weaknesses, were then submitted to the Source Evaluation Board (SEB).

Daigle v. United States

42 Ct. Cl. 124 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 4, 1907

R., 34 ), Hollister v. Abbott (31 N. H., 448; 64 Am. Dec., 342 ) Case v. Beauregard ( 101 U. S., 688 ) ; Lawrence v. Milwaukee ( 45 Wis., 306 ) ; Hopkins v. Lee ( 6 Wheat., 109 ).' … “As was said by Earle, J., in the case of Brown v. Mayor ( 66 N.

Church of the Visible Intelligence that Governs Universe v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 55 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1983

Association shall be determined solely by the founder of the church” and “shall not be amended or abridged while he lives;” and that “upon the death of the Founder ...,” the “Head of the Church ... shall be chosen by the Board … Compensation will be decided on a yearly basis and presented to the Board of Trustees and at no time will compensation or salary be determined in an arbitrary manner.

Eastwood v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 882 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1982

In 1974 he applied to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (bcnr) to have his discharge upgraded and to be reinstated in the reserves. … In Rumph v. United States, 228 Ct.

Sumpter

578 F.2d 1391 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1978

Plaintiff appealed to the Civil Service Board of Appeals and Review (BAR) which found the separation action to be warranted. … Ruderer v. United *727 States, 188 Ct.Cl. 456, 468 , 412 F.2d 1285, 1292 (1969) cert. denied, 398 U.S. 914 (1970).

Gresham, Smith & Partners v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,247 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 23, 1991

The first layer is a 3ys-inch thick iscoyanurate foam board mechanically attached to the roof deck, followed by a second layer of 1-inch thick perlite roof board set in hot asphalt. … See Troise v.

Erosion Victims of Lake Superior Regulation v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 68 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1987

In Edison Sault Electric Company v. … Upon remand, the trial court in Miller v.

Charlson v. United States

525 F.2d 1046 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1975

Co. v. … Commissioner v. Court Holding Co., 324 U.S. 331 (1945); Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473 (1940); Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935).

Kelley's Creek & Northwestern Railroad v. United States

100 Ct. Cl. 396 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1943

Under the law of West Virginia a riparian owner on a navigable stream owns the land to low-water mark; the title to the bed of the stream beyond low-water mark toward the opposite shore is in the State; Brown Oil Co. v. … E. 43 ; Barre v. Fleming, 29 W. Va. 314 ; Norfolk City v.