Case law

Landmark, Inc. v. United States

25 Cl. Ct. 100 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 10, 1992

This rule was established long ago in Commissioner v. … To the same effect, see also Motor Insurance Corp. v.

Haggar Co. v. United States

128 F. Supp. 404 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

The Government, in its answer and its motion for summary judgment, remedies that omission and reminds us that, in the case of Haggar v. United States, 121 C. … D. 15; Hadden v. Rumsey Products, Inc. (2d Circ.) 196 F. 2d 92 . Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

Kantor v. United States

205 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1974

Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 (1965) ; United States v. Shimer, 367 U.S. 374, 381-82 (1961) ; Barrington Manor Apts. Corp. v. United States, 198 Ct. … Paul v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 108, 115 , 432 F. 2d 455, 458-59 (1970); American Guar. Corp. v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 502, 506 , 401 F. 2d 1004, 1006-07 (1968) ; Schellfeffer v. United States, 170 Ct.

Gruber v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 222 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1925

Stackhouse, Commander, Senior Member Board of Sale, in full on account of steel awarded the plaintiff by the Navy Department. … In the case of Erie Coal amd Coke Corp. v. United States, *230 decided by the Supreme Court of the United States January 5, 1925, 266 U.

Gresham, Smith & Partners v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,247 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 23, 1991

The first layer is a 3ys-inch thick iscoyanurate foam board mechanically attached to the roof deck, followed by a second layer of 1-inch thick perlite roof board set in hot asphalt. … See Troise v.

Crygier v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 268 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1890

On the 5th day of July, 1879, he reported for duty on board the ship Marion, on which he served until June 25, 1882, when he was detached and ordered home because *272 of physical disability. … from the 30th of September, 1884, to the 5th of Augnst, 1885, the court is of opinion, that the case in that branch, falls within the law announced by the Supreme Court, in confirmation of this court in the case of Perkins v.

Howard v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 334 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1984

Elm Street Realty Trust v. Commissioner, 76 T.C. 803, 813 (1981); see also Kilgallon v. … Nee v.

Robert Davis Powers, Jr. v. The United States

401 F.2d 813 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1968

On July 1, 1961, the President of the United States, acting upon the recommendation of a selection board under the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 5787 , appointed plaintiff to the grade of rear admiral, for such time as plaintiff … Rainwater et al. v. United States, 356 U.S. 590, 593 , 78 S.Ct. 946 , 2 L.Ed.2d 996 (1958).

Hitch v. United States

113 Ct. Cl. 526 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 6, 1949

Averell Harriman, sent plaintiff on a mission to the War Production Board in Washington where plaintiff accepted employment with that Board. … (I Beale, Conflict of Laws, Sec. 10.3, p. 109; State of Texas v. State of Florida, 306 U. S. 398, 424 ; DeHaven and Son Hardware Co. v. Schultz, 122 Ore. 493 , 259 P. 778, 780 .)

Greene v. Secretary of the Deptartment of Health & Human Services

19 Cl. Ct. 57 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 14, 1989

Watson has been licensed to practice law in the state of Texas since 1981, and has only been board-certified in personal injury trial law and civil trial law since 1986. … He is the president of the Austin Young Lawyers Association and is a member of the executive board of the Travis County Bar Association. Mr.

Farmers & Ginners Cotton Oil Co. v. United States

76 Ct. Cl. 294 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1932

When plaintiff attempted before the Board of Contract Adjustment to have the second contract set aside, it clearly was repudiating it. … The case of Bowe v.

Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. United States

172 F. Supp. 454 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1959

However, during the period January 25, 1951, to August 2, 1951, plaintiff was prohibited from raising wages by reason of a wage freeze imposed by the Wage Stabilization Board. … It seems hardly necessary to cite authority for this statement, but this is the clear implication of the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v.

Widdoss v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

25 Cl. Ct. 251 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1992

Brown v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 920 F.2d 918, 919 (Fed.Cir.1990). Under this standard of review, the court, of course, “may not substitute its judgment for that of the special master.” Mobley v. … Mihalakis is certified by the American Board of Pathology and Anatomic Pathology in clinical pathology and forensic pathology. .

Ford Motor Co. v. United States

9 F. Supp. 590 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1935

C.) 299 F. 326 ; Popular Price Tailoring Company v. Commissioner (Seventh C. C. A.) 33 F.(2d) 464 ; Woodside Cotton Mills Company v. Commissioner, 13 B. T. A. 266. … Hoyt et al. v. United States, 39 F. (2d) 739, 69 Ct. Cl. 604 .

Calfon Construction Inc. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,738 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1989

Shupe Inc. v. … In Ling-Temco-Vought v.

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States

37 F.2d 965 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 10, 1930

In Stoddard v. Chambers, 2 How. 284, 317 , 11 L. Ed. 269 , the court said: 'How an act under a law means in conformity with it.” To the same effeet was Mills v. Stoddard, 8 How. 345 , 12 L. Ed. 1107 ; Risley v. … Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U. S. 457 , 12 S. Ct. 511 , 36 L. Ed. 226 ; Binns v. United States, 194 U. S. *969 487, 24 S. Ct. 816 , 48 L. Ed. 1087 ; Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v.

National Cored Forgings Co. v. United States

132 F. Supp. 454 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

See Sloan Shipyards Corporation, et al. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation and the United States, 258 U. … Sloan Shipyards Corporation, et al. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation and the United States, supra; Keifer & Keifer v.

Rio Hondo Memorial Hospital v. United States

689 F.2d 1025 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 22, 1982

In Goletta Valley Community Hospital v. … We recognize that the Provider Reimbursement Review Board may have taken a contrary position. See [1975] Medicare and Medicaid Guide (CCH) If 27,604.

Shirley H. Weaver George v. The United States

434 F.2d 1336 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1970

Smith”), of the El Paso law firm of Kemp, Smith, Brown, Goggin & White (now Kemp, Smith, White, Duncan & Hammond). Mr. Weaver paid to Mr. … S. at pp. 51-52, 83 S.Ct. 623 ; Davis v.

Central Excavators, Inc. v. United States

116 Ct. Cl. 744 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950

could *773 be paid by the contractor (¶ 6 (d), Special Conditions) unless such, rates should be changed by the National War Labor Board or the Wage Adjustment Board. … United States v. Beuttas, 324 U. S. 768 . *775 3.