Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

1.95s

  • General Elevator Corp. v. United States

    20 Cl. Ct. 345 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1990

    Brown of the firm of Klein, Brown and Carter of Springfield, relating to these same questions addressed in his earlier letter to Long, he reiterated his earlier opinion and supplemented it with respect to the treatment of … Stubbs, Overbeck & Assoc. v. United States, 445 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir.1971).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mayer v. United States

    5 Ct. Cl. 317 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869

    A board of appraisal was convened on the 2d of July, 1866, which determined that $10,000 was a fair valuation of the buildings in their present condition. 8. On the llt-h of July, 1866, Julia A. … (Johnson v. Fessler, 7 Watts, 48 ; Ball v. Newton, 7 Cush., 59 .) But this right was not exercised hastily,- or in a manner calculated to prejudice the claimants. The petitioner had declined the'proposition, and Mrs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roberson v. United States

    124 F. Supp. 857 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1954

    In McLean v. … In Hadley v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Peters v. United States

    534 F.2d 232 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1975

    Desmond v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 507, 525-26 (1973); Bielec v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 550, 560 , 456 F. 2d 690, 696 (1972); Dianish v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 702, 707 (1968). … Steuer v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 282 (1975); Weir v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 501, 511 , 474 F. 2d 617, 622 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1066 (1973); Henneberger v. United States, 187 Ct.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania v. United States

    36 Ct. Cl. 507 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 28, 1901

    (Wardwell v. United States, 172 U. S. R., 51 ; Finn v. Same, 123 U. S. R., 123 .) … (Brown v. Buena Vista, 95 U. S. R., 161 .) Length of time is not always a test of staleness. (Paschell v. Hindever, 28 Ohio St., 568 , 580.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 4-Star Construction Corp. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,943 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 25, 1984

    See 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d; United States v. Munsey Trust Co., 332 U.S. 234, 241 , 67 S.Ct. 1599, 1602 , 91 L.Ed. 2022 (1947); United Electric Corp. v. … Bateson Co., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Board of Trustees, 434 U.S. 586, 589 , 98 S.Ct. 873, 875 , 55 L.Ed.2d 50 (1978); F.D. Rich Co., Inc. v. United States ex rel.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Collins v. United States

    35 Ct. Cl. 122 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1900

    Co. v. Marsh (114 U. S. R.., 549) and Chicago and Santa Fe R. R. Co. v. Price ( 138 U. S. … Me Gulloch v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eastwood v. United States

    230 Ct. Cl. 882 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1982

    In 1974 he applied to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (bcnr) to have his discharge upgraded and to be reinstated in the reserves. … In Rumph v. United States, 228 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brooks-Callaway Co. v. United States

    97 Ct. Cl. 689 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1942

    Gabriel Levee on account of the failure of the Levee Board to furnish right of way, the contracting officer has found that the injunction enjoining the Levee Board from furnishing the necessary right of way was dissolved … Austin Engineering Company v. United States, No. 43364, decided October 5, 1942, 97 C. Cls. 68 . After this final settlement had been made the department concerned no longer had jurisdiction of the matter.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Swiger v. United States

    652 F.2d 70 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1981

    Gentry v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 654 (1980); Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 502 , 504 F.2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975). … Plant v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 682 (1980); Frommhagen v. United States, 216 Ct.Cl. 1 , 573 F.2d 52 (1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 909 (1979).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fort Worth Refining Company v. The United States

    440 F.2d 414 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1971

    440 F.2d 414 FORT WORTH REFINING COMPANY v. The UNITED STATES. No. 351-69. United States Court of Claims. June 11, 1971. John C. Nabors, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff. W. Robert Brown, Houston, Tex., attorney of record. … Liddell, Sapp, Zively & Brown, Houston, Tex., of counsel. Russell W. Koskinen, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. L. Patrick Gray, III, for defendant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Knapp Bros. Shoe Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

    135 Ct. Cl. 797 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

    Mueller Co. v. Commissioner, 190 F. 2d 120 , C. A. 3, Sico Co. v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 373 , and Souths eastern Fair Assn. v. United States, 100 C. Cls. 216 , that question was answered in the affirmative. … Since its organization, the control of plaintiff has at all times been vested in its board of directors. The business has been managed by the two Knapps, subject to the general supervision of. the board of directors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States

    37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,273 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1992

    See United States v. … Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. United States, 811 F.2d 586, 592 (Fed.Cir.1987) (citing Tecom Inc. v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 936-37 (Fed.Cir.1984)); Metric Constr. Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States

    462 F.2d 526 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1972

    This question arose in Empire Refineries, Inc. v. … Aetna Insurance Co. v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 713 , 456 F. 2d 773 (1972) ; Preuss v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 469 , 412 F. 2d 1293 (1969) ; Madden v. United States, 178 Ct.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cleek Aviation v. United States

    22 Cl. Ct. 260 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1991

    (citing Reinsurance Co. of America v. Administratia, 808 F.2d 1249, 1251-52 (7th Cir.1987); Diliberti v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 505, 506 (1984)). … See Sanchez v. Board of Regents of Texas Southern University, 30 Fed.R.Serv.2d (Callaghan) 1684 , 1685 (S.D.Tex.1980), aff' d, 633 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. Unit A Jan.1981).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Baxter v. United States

    32 Ct. Cl. 75 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 4, 1897

    In the case of the United States v. … In the case of Gratiot v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co. v. United States

    69 Ct. Cl. 91 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 10, 1930

    In United States v. Oregon Short Line R. R. … Louis v. Howard, 119 Mo. 47 ; Newport News & M. Val. Co. v. United States, 61 Fed. 488 , 21 Ruling Case Law 546, sec. 108.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Benenson v. United States

    548 F.2d 939 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1977

    Cl. 598 , 345 F. 2d 565 (1965); Brown v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 385 F. Supp. 1128 (D. Nev. 1973), and Keystone Associates v. State of New York, 371 N.Y.S.2d 814 (1975). … Berman v. Parker; Bydlon v. United States and Brown v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, supra.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Traders Compress Co. v. United States

    74 F. Supp. 649 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1947

    Its business was to be managed by a Board of Directors. … United States v. Strang, 254 U. S. 491, 493 ; United States Shipping Board v. Harwood, 281 U. S. 519, 525-6 . There were reasons for reducing the rates on Commodity cotton and excluding other cotton.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shirley H. Weaver George v. The United States

    434 F.2d 1336 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1970

    Smith”), of the El Paso law firm of Kemp, Smith, Brown, Goggin & White (now Kemp, Smith, White, Duncan & Hammond). Mr. Weaver paid to Mr. … S. at pp. 51-52, 83 S.Ct. 623 ; Davis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.