Case law

Tryon v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 425 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1897

As was said in Moore v. Darrall (4 Hag. Eccl., 346), “Domicile does not depend upon residence alone, but on a consideration of all the circumstances of each case.” … (Brown v. Keene, 8 Peters, 112 ).

Simons v. United States

19 Ct. Cl. 601 · United States Court of Claims · May 26, 1884

L., p. 122, § 6, ch. 98), provided— “ That the said board of tax commissioners shall enter upon the discharge of the duties of their office whenever the commanding general of the forces of the United States, entering into … In the words of Baron Mam tin in Steele v. Williams (20 Eng. L. & Eq. R., 319), “ to call such a payment a voluntary payment is an abuse of language.”

Journeycake v. Cherokee Nation

31 Ct. Cl. 140 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1896

In the case of Journeycake v. The Cherokee Nation, the motion of the complainant for a further decree, filed July 5, 1895, is overruled. In the case of Whitmire, trustee, v. … Browning-, “ Commissioner of Indian-Affairs. “ Sir : The court is informed that the Commissioner of Indian Affairs desires its opinion in regard to the fifth of the proposed instructions referred for the consideration of

Elizabeth L. Bilanow, Administratrix of the Estate of Herman David Levinson, Deceased. v. The United States

309 F.2d 267 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1963

The Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission, in its denial of plaintiff’s appeal, called attention precisely to this practical side of the matter when it discussed the fact that the one-year credit, and … Hilton v. Forrestal, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 44 , 165 F.2d 251 (1947). We need not hold that another method, or even other methods might not have proven satisfactory and reasonable. That is not in issue here.

B.E.S. Environmental Specialists, Inc. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,163 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 23, 1991

A letter contract was utilized in order to allow emergency response to commence immediately at a hazardous waste site, Brown’s Battery Breaking site in Tilden Township, Pennsylvania. … Schlosser Co. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1336, 1338 (Fed.Cir. 1983).

Cahn v. United States

10 F. Supp. 577 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1935

We therefore conclude that, if the case of Knox v. … We consider that the cases of Kaufman v. Reinecke (C. C. A.) 68 F.(2d) 642 , and Tait v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. (C. C.

Matson v. United States

171 F. Supp. 283 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959

See Braniff Airways v. Nebraska Board, 347 U.S. 590, 594 . Now our Declaration of Policy in the Act of 1958 reads: Sec. 103. … See Richards v. Washington Terminal Co., 233 U.S. 546, 555 ; Cambell v. United States, 266 U.S. 368 ; United States v.

BLH, Inc. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,376 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 15, 1987

United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 713 F.2d 1541, 1550 (Fed.Cir.1983). … Berger v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 453 F.2d 991, 995 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 848 , 93 S.Ct. 54 , 34 L.Ed.2d 89 (1972) (quoting Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R.

Whittlesey v. United States

39 Ct. Cl. 204 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1904

The ship was captured on the return, after it had discharged the cargo of the outward voyage, and had nothing on board of a contraband character. … In the case of Carrington et al. v. The Mechanics’ Insurance Company ( 8 Pet., 495 ) the court, in quoting from the case of The Neutralitet (1801, 3 Rob.

Moore v. United States

37 F. Supp. 136 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1941

The question of this case, and cognate questions have been considered by the Department and litigated in the Board of Tax Appeals and the courts. … Cole v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 81 F.2d 485 ; Crowe v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 86 F.2d 796 ; Commissioner v. Rabenold, supra; Sachs v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 111 F.2d 648 .

Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 51 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1987

Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1166 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965) (quoting Helvering v. Hammel, 311 U.S. 504, 510-11 , 61 S.Ct. 368, 371 , 85 L.Ed. 303 (1941)). … Lest there be any doubt about this conclusion, we refer to Phipps v.

General Electric Co. v. United States

50 Ct. Cl. 287 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1915

Seitz v. Brewers Mach. Co., 141 U. S., 610 , 517; Bond v. … Copley Iron Co. v. Pope, 108 N. Y., 232 ; Brown v. Foster, 108 N. Y., 387 ; Watson v. Bigelow, 77 Conn., 124 .

Hunkin Conkey Construction Co. v. United States

461 F.2d 1270 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

This claim is pending bef ore the Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals (Eng. BCA No. 2945) and is not in any way involved in this litigation. … See, Keco Industries v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 983 , 364 F. 2d 838 (1966) cert. denied 386 U.S. 958 (1967). See generally, Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v.

Cronk v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 512 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1987

Plaintiff was removed from the USPS and on December 24, 1981 filed an appeal with the Merit Systems Protection Board *513 (MSPB), Dallas Regional Office, challenging the disallowance of his application for disability retirement … Apparently, through clerical error, the petition bearing the caption “Carl Cronk v.

Ketchikan Pulp Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,854 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1990

The contract provided that Ketchikan would purchase approximately 48,820 MBF (thousand board feet) of timber at a weighted average price of $200.60 per MBF,- and would complete the harvesting on or before December 81, 1985 … Churchill Chemical Corp. v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 284, 288 , 602 F.2d 358, 361 (1979).

Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. United States

122 F. Supp. 835 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1954

The principles governing this case are the same as those in the case of Caltex (Philippines), Inc. v. United States, No. 48322, this day decided. 1. … The necessity for such authority has been discussed in Caltex (Philippines), Inc., v. United States, supra, and will not be repeated here.

American Safety Razor Corporation v. United States

6 F. Supp. 293 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

C.) 39 F.(2d) 940 , and McKesson & Robbins v. Edwards (C. C. A.) 57 F.(2d) 147, 149 . … What we have said above is not in accordance with the view taken in Heebner v. United States (D. C.) 50 F.(2d) 904 .

Ellis

27 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,366 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1980

Bookman v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 108, 116 , 453 F.2d 1263, 1267 (1972); Wilmot v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 666, 682, 686 (1974). … In AFGE v.

Nevada v. United States

45 Ct. Cl. 254 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1910

“V. … (United States v. Tanner, 147 U. S., 661 ; United States v. Finnell, 185 ibid., 236; Penoyer v. McConnaughy, 140 U. S., 1 .)

Andrews v. United States

52 Ct. Cl. 373 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1917

This court in a recent opinion by the Chief Justice in Griffis v. … Newcomber v. United States, 51 C. Cls., 408 ; Magin-nis v. United States, ante, p. 271.