Case law

Ocean Technology, Inc. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,783 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1990

In United States v. … As stated in Prestex, Inc. v.

Barberi v. United States

144 Ct. Cl. 573 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959

The Board of Appeals and Review affirmed. 1. No arbitrary action is shown. … This is illustrated by the case of Hilton v. Sullivan, 334 U. S. 323 , in which predominant weight was given to “military preference”, and none to “length of service.”

Leverette v. United States

159 F. Supp. 591 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1958

The Supreme Court in its *556 discussion of this question in Board of Commissioners v. United States, 308 U.

Schumacher v. Secretary of Dept. of Health & Human Services

26 Cl. Ct. 1033 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 5, 1992

Testifying for respondent was Lester Adelman, M.D., a board certified neuropathologist, and Harold Fogelson, M.D., a board certified pediatric neurologist. … Under Misasi v.

Cronk v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 512 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1987

Plaintiff was removed from the USPS and on December 24, 1981 filed an appeal with the Merit Systems Protection Board *513 (MSPB), Dallas Regional Office, challenging the disallowance of his application for disability retirement … Apparently, through clerical error, the petition bearing the caption “Carl Cronk v.

Dick & Bros. Quincy Brewing Co. v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 505 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1929

Fell v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. … Renziehausen v. Commissioner, supra.

Vaughn v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 316 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 24, 1983

Co. v. … Roccaforte, Jr. v. Commissioner, supra; Jones v. Commissioner, 640 F.2d 745 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 965 , 102 S.Ct. 507 , 70 L.Ed.2d 381 (1981); and Collins v.

JMNI, Inc. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,957 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1984

Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 332 U.S. 407, 411 , 68 S.Ct. 123, 126 , 92 L.Ed. 32 (1947); See also International Electronics Corp. v. … United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 208, 228 , 646 F.2d 496, 508 (1981); Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. United States, 217 Ct.Cl. 314, 337 , 580 F.2d 400, 414 (1978); Higgs v.

Paul v. United States

20 Cl. Ct. 236 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 23, 1990

Bank of Mobile v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 1 (1984). . Lance Indus., Inc. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 762 (1984). . Burt v. United States, 199 Ct.Cl. 897 (1972). . Hulsey v. … See California Canners & Growers v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 774, 786 (1986); Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. at 9 n. 6. . Alleman v. United States, 43 Ct.Cl. 144, 151 (1908). . Elmers v.

Valley View Community Hospital v. United States

679 F.2d 857 · United States Court of Claims · May 19, 1982

As we stated in Robishaw v. United States, 222 Ct. … Goldstein v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 888, 889 (1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 974 (1973); see also West Seattle General Hospital, Inc. v. United States, ante at 132.

Giles v. United States

553 F.2d 647 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1977

Plaintiff next appealed to the CSC Appeals Review Board (ARB). In an opinion dated March 31, 1975, the ARB rejected all of plaintiffs contentions and affirmed his removal. … Byrne s v. United States, post at 675 Boylan v. United States 211 Ct.Cl. 370 (1976); Boyce v. United States 211 Ct.Cl. 57 , 543 F.2d 1290 (1976); Pascal v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 183 , 543 F.2d 1284 (1976); Hoover v.

Martin v. United States

3 Ct. Cl. 64 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1867

So the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Wood v. … v.

Hubbell v. United States

4 Ct. Cl. 37 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1868

Milligan, J., concurring: This court in the case of Jones & Brown v. The United States, ( 1 C. Cls. … Jackson v. Lamphere, ( 3 Peters, 280 ;) Curtis’s Com., §§ 252,253, and authors there cited.

Works v. United States

174 F. Supp. 956 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1959

Gleason v. Seaboard Air Line Ry., 278 U.S. 349 ; Standard Surety & Cas. Co. v. Plantsville Nat. Bank, 158 F. 2d 422 ; Ralston Purina Co. v. Novak, 111 F. 2d 631 . … the Board.

Carver v. United States

412 F.2d 233 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1969

Hamilton v. Flowers, 183 So. 811 (Fla. 1938); Elvins v. Seestedt, 193 So. 54 (Fla. 1940); McGriff v. McGill, 62 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 1952); Baum v. Corn, 167 So. 2d 740 (2d D.C.A. … Cases cited include: Aquilino v. United States, 363 U.S. 509 (1960); Morgan v. Commissioner, 309 U.S. 78 (1940), and cases therein cited; Thomas v. Perkins, 301 U.S. 655 (1937) ; Palmer v.

Moller v. United States

553 F. Supp. 1071 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1982

In Wilson v. … In Purvis v.

Tryon v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 425 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1897

As was said in Moore v. Darrall (4 Hag. Eccl., 346), “Domicile does not depend upon residence alone, but on a consideration of all the circumstances of each case.” … (Brown v. Keene, 8 Peters, 112 ).

Bringwald, Inc. v. The United States

334 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1964

Thus, we have said in Irby Construction Co. v. … Nowland v. Commissioner, 244 F.2d 450, 455 (4th Cir. 1957). The case of Gordy Tire Co. v.

Judkins

650 F.2d 286 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1980

Finally, the Appeals Review Board refused to reconsider plaintiffs case. Plaintiff complains that since the Bureau failed to provide him with the required 60-day notice, its actions were not in accordance with law. … See Grover v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 337 (1973); Armstrong v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 53 , 405 F.2d 1275 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 934 (1969) (showing of bias or malice required).

Simons v. United States

19 Ct. Cl. 601 · United States Court of Claims · May 26, 1884

L., p. 122, § 6, ch. 98), provided— “ That the said board of tax commissioners shall enter upon the discharge of the duties of their office whenever the commanding general of the forces of the United States, entering into … In the words of Baron Mam tin in Steele v. Williams (20 Eng. L. & Eq. R., 319), “ to call such a payment a voluntary payment is an abuse of language.”