Case law

Joyce v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 440 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1986

This court remanded the case to the successor of the CSC, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), so that the plaintiff could introduce testimony excluded by the CSC. Joyce v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 226 (1983). … He cites Camero v.

Hills Transportation Co. v. United States

492 F.2d 1394 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1974

Co. v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 37 , 458 F. 2d 49 (1972). … Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 141 , 423 F. 2d 300 (1970).

Samuel Winslow Skate Mfg. Co. v. United States

50 F.2d 299 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931

and uniforms, golf bags and clubs, lacrosse sticks, balls of all kinds, including baseballs, footballs, tennis, golf, lacrosse, billiard and pool balls, fishing rods and reels, billiard and pool tables, chess and checker boards … LaBelle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. 377, 386 , 41 S. Ct. 528 , 65 L. Ed. 998 . In the case of Jordan v. Roche, 228 U. S. 436, 445 , 33 S. Ct. 573, 575 , 57 L.

American Milk Products Corporation v. United States

41 F.2d 966 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1930

The penalty imposed is a means of punishment, United States v. Childs, 266 U. S. 304 , 45 S. Ct. 110 , 69 L. Ed. 299 , and the tax is only the measure of it. … In that case the board held that tho penalty should only be assessed on the additional amount imposed by the 1918 act.

Hinton

513 F.2d 638 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 20, 1974

contends, inter alia, that his discharge was unlawful because he was not afforded certain safeguards: (1) the right to be notified in writing of his pending discharge, (2) the right to present his case before an administrative board … (See Alloy Products Corp. v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 376, 381 , 302 F.2d 528, 531 (1962) and 37 U.S.C. 308(e)).

Martin and Celia Maliner v. The United States

362 F.2d 281 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966

In Braunstein v. … With their attorney, they constituted the board of directors and officers of the corporation.

Hartigan v. United States

38 Ct. Cl. 346 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 9, 1903

We are referred to Babbitt v. The United States ( 16 C. Cls. … The decision in the case of Morton v. United States ( 19 C. Cls.

Hines ex rel. Sevier v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services

26 Cl. Ct. 114 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1992

Stotts v. Secretary of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 23 Cl.Ct. 352, 358-61 (1991); see Hines v. Secretary of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 940 F.2d 1518, 1523-24 (Fed.Cir.1991); Murphy v. … To support its position, respondent cited Gavette v.

Meyers v. United States

169 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965

Jordan v. United States, supra, p. 648 . … The two eases mentioned in plaintiff’s brief, Wittner v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 231 (1948), and Washington v. United States, 137 Ct. Cl. 344 , 147 F.

Creek Nation v. United States

93 Ct. Cl. 561 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1941

United States v. State Investment Co., 264 U. S. 206 ; Spreckles v. Brown, 212 U. S. 208, 212 ; Higueras v. United States, 5 Wallace, 827, 835.

Kulb v. United States

18 Ct. Cl. 560 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1883

(Harvey v. Smith, 55 Ill., 224 ; Elliot v. Levings, 55 Ill., 214 ; Seibel v. Vaughan, 69 Ill., 257 .) … (Garrad v. Haddon, 67 Penn. St., 52; Zimmerman v. Rote, 75 Penn. St., 188; Brown v. Reed, 79 Penn. St., 370; *566 Yocum v. Smith, 63 Ill., 321 ; Vicher v. Webster, 8 Col., 109 ; Rainbolt v. Eddy, 35 Iowa, 440 .)

Tree v. United States

55 F. Supp. 438 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1944

The Board of Tax Appeals so held in Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company et al v. Commissioner, 40 B. T. A. 25. … Blair v. Commissioner, 300 U. S. 5 ; Commissioner v. Field, 42 F. (2d) 820 (C. C. A. 2d).

Fauber v. United States

37 F. Supp. 415 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1941

He also submitted his inventions *438 to the Patents and Design Board, created by section 10 (r) of the act of July 2, 1926. His application for an award from this board, however, was denied. … In Smith v.

McMaster Construction, Inc. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,150 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 5, 1991

In CACI, Inc. v. … United States v.

Towanda Textiles, Inc. v. United States

180 F. Supp. 373 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1960

In Spreckels v. … United States v.

Octagon Process Inc. v. United States

141 Ct. Cl. 599 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1958

Farwell v. United States, 137 C. Cls. 832 . … See Insurance Co. v. Dutcher, 95 U. S. 269 .

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. United States

21 Ct. Cl. 195 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1886

(People v. Rickert, 8 Cowan, 226; Browne on Statute of Frauds, 39.) … (Va nderpoel v. Smith, 2 Daly, N. Y., 135; Wall et al. v. Hinds, 4 Gray, 256 .)

Hayes v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 1031 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1982

Cf., however, Polos v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 547 , 621 F.2d 385 (1980). DiLuigi v. … In Monett v. United States, 190 Ct.

Briggs Engineering & Testing Co. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,338 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1982

Plaintiff then wrote the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (gsabca) regarding the status of its claim. … Although the Government contends that our decision in White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United States, 229 Ct.

Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States

118 Ct. Cl. 290 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1951

But it was excellent timber, and we have concluded that it had, as it lay after the storm, a capital or stumpage value of $2.50 per thousand board feet. … See Seminole Nation v. United States, 316 U. S. 286 ; Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 101 C. Cls. 10, 19 .