Case law

Cumming v. United States

57 Ct. Cl. 551 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1922

In Hill v. … Co. v. Bartlett, 3 Cush. 224 ; Brown v. Slee, 103 U. S. 828 ; Willard v. Tayloe, 8 Wall. 551 . But it was an executory contract, the performance of which depended on future contingencies.

Joseph F. O'Brien v. United States

284 F.2d 692 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1960

In Washington v. … Armand v. United States, 1956, 136 Ct.Cl. 339 ; Kenny v. United States, 1956, 145 F.Supp. 898 , 134 Ct.Cl. 442 , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 893 , 77 S.Ct. 131 , 1 L.Ed.2d 86 ; Taylor v.

Hinton

513 F.2d 638 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 20, 1974

contends, inter alia, that his discharge was unlawful because he was not afforded certain safeguards: (1) the right to be notified in writing of his pending discharge, (2) the right to present his case before an administrative board … (See Alloy Products Corp. v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 376, 381 , 302 F.2d 528, 531 (1962) and 37 U.S.C. 308(e)).

Doyle v. United States

46 Ct. Cl. 181 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 13, 1911

Colum bia., and to report by letter to the commandant of the navy yard, New York, for duty on board the U. S. S. Hancock. … (Engard v. United States, 196 U. S., 511 ; 38 C.

McShain Co. v. United States

87 Ct. Cl. 601 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1938

Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 213 U. S. 25, 43 ; and St. Louis, etc. Railroad v. United States, 267 U. S. 346, 349 . … Electric Boat Company, a Corp., v. United States, 81 C.

Harris v. United States

149 Ct. Cl. 15 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1960

Crocker v. United States, 130 C. Cls. 567 ; McGuire v. United States, 145 C. Cls. 17 . … As to the annual leave question, Hynning v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 486 , and McGuire v. United States, supra, are in point.

Montgomery Ward & Co. ex rel. Pettibone v. United States

94 Ct. Cl. 309 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1941

See Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United States, 277 U. S. 551 ; John B. Kelly, Inc. v. United States, 87 C. Cls. 271 ; Dismuke v. United States, 297 U. S. 167 . … Ed. 419 , where a statutory provision reciting that “the board of supervisors * * * may, if deemed advisable, levy a special tax” was construed.

Faber, Coe & Gregg, Inc. v. United States

71 Ct. Cl. 296 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1930

In Jordan, Collector, v. Roche, 228 U. … The cases of Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , and May v. New Orleans, 178 U. S. 496 , appear to me to have no application.

Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States

684 F.2d 852 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1982

See Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564 (1908). … . * * * * * As in Arizona v.

Farenholt v. United States

42 Ct. Cl. 114 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 4, 1907

Lancaster, the decision in the case of Ryan v. The United States ( 38 C. Cls. … R., 222 ), Ryan v. The United States ( 38 C. Cls. R., 143 ), and also in Ackley's case ( 40 C. Cls. R., 216 ). The case of Thomas v.

Williams v. United States

231 Ct. Cl. 760 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1982

He appealed to the Civil Service Commission and the hearing examiner upheld the removal. 1 Plaintiffs appeal to the Board of Appeals and Review was denied as untimely. … See Smith v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 168 , 654 F.2d 50 (1981). If there is to be any relief, it will have to come from some other tribunal.

Armitage v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 308 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1992

In Metropolitan Airports Authority v. … The invalidation of the Board of Review did not affect the existence of the MWAA or the transfer of the FAA’s authority to the MWAA. In Coe v. Burnley, No. 86-2536, 1988 WL 288971 (D.D.C.

Seminole Indians v. United States

455 F.2d 539 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1972

Per Curiam: After our decision in United States v. Seminole Indians, 180 Ct. … Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 364, 373 (1939).

Tignor v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 321 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1928

All owners of land or other property taken were notified to appear before the Board of Valuation of *325 Commandeered Property of the Navy Department and present their claims for compensation. … Defendant denies the right of plaintiff to recover in any sum, under the authority of the case of Bailey and Fulgham v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 77 .

Jennings v. United States

155 F. Supp. 571 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 9, 1957

Laguana v. Ansell, 102 F. Supp. 919 , aff’d. 212 F. 2d 207 , cert. den., 348 U. S. 830 ; Wilson v. Kennedy, 232 F. 2d 153 ; Phelan v. Taitano, 233 F. 2d 117 ; Lampkin v. Brown & Root, 233 F. 2d 320 .

Adler Construction Co. v. United States

423 F.2d 1362 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

Co. v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 34, 65-66 , 75 F. Supp. 255, 260 (1948). … Co. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 801 (1963).

Statesman Savings Holding Corp. v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 904 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1992

Bank v. … Bank v.

Hickey v. United States

88 F. Supp. 888 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1950

On review of the case, with others, the Supreme Court in Lichter et al., Doing Business as Southern Fireproofing Co. v. United States, 334 U. … It provided the one and only procedure to secure a redetermination of the excessive profits which had been determined to exist by the orders of the respective Secretaries or of the Board in the cases before us.

Switkes v. United States

480 F.2d 844 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1973

Thus in Gresham v. United States, 200 Ct. … Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393 (1961); Bates v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 35 , 453 F. 2d 1382 (1972); Dickenson v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 512 (1963).

Woodbridge v. United States

55 Ct. Cl. 234 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1920

It was said in Adams v. … Again, as well said in Kendall v.