Case law

Baylor v. United States

198 Ct. Cl. 331 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

In Raff v. … Brown (3), Joe Allen Brown (4), Moses Brooks, Jr. (5), william Byrd, Jr. (6), Shirley Dickens (7), Joseph O. Donley (9), Homer Ellison (10), Robert T. Eilertson (11), James R. Everett (12), Albert T.

Gray

650 F.2d 287 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1980

This was done voluntarily without recourse to the Correction Board. He claims punitive damages in the amount of $150,000. … Haislip v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 339 , 296 F.Supp. 469 (1961); Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1 , 310 F.2d 381 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932 (1963); Oleson v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 9 (1965).

Babbitt v. United States

16 Ct. Cl. 202 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1880

It directs the departmental commander annually to convoke a board to pass upon these recommendations, and it requires the reports of these boards, with full statements as to each person, to be forwarded to the Secretary of … In the recent case of Fendall v.

Dierking v. United States

231 Ct. Cl. 902 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 20, 1982

But even if S.F. 50 is not an absolute prerequisite to appointment (see National Treasury Employees Union v. Regan, 663 F.2d 239 (D.C. Cir. 1981); Pratte v. … National Labor Relations Board, *903 683 F.2d 1038 (7th Cir. 1982), but see Goutos v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 95, 97-8 , 552 F.2d 922, 924 (1976), and Costner v. United States, 229 Ct.

Brimberry v. United States

98 Ct. Cl. 335 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1943

S.) 230; Blake v. United States, 103 U. S. 227 ; Keim v. United States, 177 U. S. 290; Shurtleff v. United States, 189, U. S. 311; Burnap v. United States, 252 U. S. 512 ; Myers v. United States, supra. … Keim v. United States, 177 U. S. 290 ; Bratton v. United States, 90 C. Cls. 604 .

Wood

521 F.2d 1405 · United States Court of Claims · May 9, 1975

“it is therefore ordered, upon consideration of the briefs, exceptions, and oral argument of the parties, and upon the authority of 5 U.S.C. § 5105 , et seq., Garrigan v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 894 (1975), Wilmot v. … Cl. 666 (1974), DiRocco v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 867 (1973), and Bookman v. United States, 197 Ct.

Myers v. United States

120 Ct. Cl. 126 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1951

Guion, Trustee, v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 186, 192; Froemming Brothers, Inc., v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 193 ; Gothwaite v. United States, 102 C. Cls. 400 ; J. F. Barbour Sons v. United States, 104 C. … Cls. 360 ; Pearson, Dickerson, et al., v. United States, 115 C. Cls. 236 ; Ross Electric Construction Company, Inc., v. United States, 111 C. Cls. 644, 663.

Alabama G. S. Railroad v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 30 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1889

Since the decision in the case of The United States v. The Kansas Pacific Railway ( 99 U. S. … (Brown v. The United States, 113 U. S. R., 568 .) Upon the authority of that case the court is of the opinion that the doubtful terms of the statute should be resolved in favor of the claimant.

American Milk Products Corporation v. United States

41 F.2d 966 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1930

The penalty imposed is a means of punishment, United States v. Childs, 266 U. S. 304 , 45 S. Ct. 110 , 69 L. Ed. 299 , and the tax is only the measure of it. … In that case the board held that tho penalty should only be assessed on the additional amount imposed by the 1918 act.

McKenzie v. United States

96 F. Supp. 944 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1951

In the case of Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … Army War Contract Hardship Claims Board, which decision is attached to plaintiff’s petition. Cf. Standard Accident Insurance Company and Albert E. McKenzie as Trustee, etc. v. United States, 103 C.

Globe Indemnity Co. v. United States

102 Ct. Cl. 21 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1944

See Armstrong v. United States, 98 C. Cls. 519 . I think this is not one of those situations. The contractor encountered the problem of how to keep the earth from caving in while back filling the trenches. … Government’s supervisors of the work recommended that it be accepted, but the Director of Procurement, who was acting for the contracting officer, rejected the proposal after consideration which included the decision of a Board

Dunnigan Construction Co. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 262 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1952

Thus, plaintiffs’ position is similar to that of the plaintiff in Ross Engineering Company, Inc. v. United States, 118 C. … The Area Engineer’s orders were in no respect fraudulent and, hence, under the decision in United States v. Wunderlich, 342 U. S. 98 , we may not set them aside.

Third Scottish American Trust Co. v. United States

37 F. Supp. 279 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1941

Co., Ltd. v. Commissioner, 34 B.T.A. 295 . … See in particular the opinion of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Helvering v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Co., 90 F.2d 971 ; and also of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in Commissioner v. O. P. P.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 378 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1928

R. v. … Ass'n v.

Fauber v. United States

37 F. Supp. 415 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1941

He also submitted his inventions *438 to the Patents and Design Board, created by section 10 (r) of the act of July 2, 1926. His application for an award from this board, however, was denied. … In Smith v.

Milbourn

513 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1975

s grievance appeal, after an evidentiary hearing, was denied; she appealed to the Regional Office of the Civil Service Commission and, upon hearing, the agency’s decision to effect the separation was sustained ; the CSC Board … In a recommended decision filed May 10, 1974, Trial Judge George Willi concluded that the Supreme Court’s decision in Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 (1974), renders the vagueness issue moot.

Clinch v. United States

44 Ct. Cl. 242 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1909

In the case of Bas v. … In the case of Maley v.

Griggs v. United States

314 F.2d 515 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1963

Previously, there had been holdings that such receipts as the “Pot O’ Gold” radio giveaway, Washburn v. Commissioner, 5 T.C. 1333 , and the Ross Essay Prize, McDermott v. Commissioner, 80 U.S. App. … Your case is being forwarded to the Office of Industrial Belations for review by the Navy Incentives Award Board for consideration for additional award commensurate with the savings effected.

Bull Insular S. S. Co. v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 338 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1926

United States v. Cornell Steamboat Co., 202 U. S. 184, 190 . … Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co., 119 U. S. 625, 628 .

Wilcox v. United States

5 Ct. Cl. 386 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869

A board of officers was designated as inspectors of these horses. The orders limited the price to $165 per head. … This construction is recognized and approved in Emery v. United States, ( 4 C. Cls. R., 404 -5.)