Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
1.96s
488 F.2d 1003 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1973
This decision was affirmed by the CSC Board of Appeals and Review on November 19,1971. … See Ainsworth v. United States, supra at 172; Newman v. United States, supra at 799.
Cited 22 timesPublished186 Ct. Cl. 900 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1969
(Erenreich v. U.S. Ct. Cls. #34-62, January 24, 1964.) Accordingly, the Board finds no procedural violation as alleged. … United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520, 548-51 (1961). Revenue agents especially must be “above board, in all their dealings with the taxpaying public.” Liotta v. United States, supra, 174 Ct.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBull Insular S. S. Co. v. United States
62 Ct. Cl. 338 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1926
United States v. Cornell Steamboat Co., 202 U. S. 184, 190 . … Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co., 119 U. S. 625, 628 .
Cited 4 timesPublished229 Ct. Cl. 771 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1982
After being denied relief by the Board for Correction of Naval Records, the Torts Claims Division of the Office of the Judge Advocate General, and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, plaintiff, … Ramsey v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 1042 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1068 (1979); Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974); Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished5 Ct. Cl. 386 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869
A board of officers was designated as inspectors of these horses. The orders limited the price to $165 per head. … This construction is recognized and approved in Emery v. United States, ( 4 C. Cls. R., 404 -5.)
Cited 0 timesPublished49 Ct. Cl. 294 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1914
BarNev, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The claimant prior to December 5, 1909, was a paymaster’s clerk in the United States Navy, serving under Paymaster Insley on board the U. S. S. Wisconsin. … S., secs. 161, 1547; United States v. Elisson, 16 Pet., 291 ; United States v. Runkle, 122 U. S., 543 ; Gratiot v. United States, 4 How., 80 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedKilgore Corp. v. United States
613 F.2d 279 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979
Co. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 110, 544 F.2d 499 (1976), or Blue Bell, Inc. v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 442 , 556 F.2d 1118 (1977). … Plaintiff having already paid to defendant the sum of $979,031.45, computed on the determination of excessive profits by the Renegotiation Board, in lieu of posting a bond to stay the execution of the Renegotiation Board’
Cited 3 timesPublishedGila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States
684 F.2d 852 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1982
See Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564 (1908). … . * * * * * As in Arizona v.
Cited 13 timesPublished215 Ct. Cl. 1078 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1978
The AEO’s decision was appealed to the Appeals Review Board (ARB) and the ARB found 'no error on the part of the agency in carrying out the reduction-in-force procedures required by applicable regulations’ and sustained the … See Miatech v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 688 (1977); Wilmot v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 666, 682 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublished127 F. Supp. 617 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1955
See Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing, 9 Cir., 174 F.2d 676 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 860 , 70 S.Ct. 101 , 94 L.Ed. 527 . In a recent decision by the Supreme Court, Universal Camera Corp. v. … Armstrong and Company v. United States, 98 Ct.Cl. 519, 529 ; Stiers v. United States, 121 Ct.Cl. 157, 172 ; and Pacific Maritime Association v. United States, 123 Ct.Cl. 667 , 676.
Cited 26 timesPublished513 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1975
s grievance appeal, after an evidentiary hearing, was denied; she appealed to the Regional Office of the Civil Service Commission and, upon hearing, the agency’s decision to effect the separation was sustained ; the CSC Board … In a recommended decision filed May 10, 1974, Trial Judge George Willi concluded that the Supreme Court’s decision in Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 (1974), renders the vagueness issue moot.
Cited 0 timesPublished618 F.2d 120 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1979
Plaintiff did not seek review by the Appeals Review Board of the Civil Service Commission. He came to court on December 6, 1977. The FEAA discussed and rejected plaintiffs contentions of duress and reduction in rank. … Christie v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 333 , 518 F.2d 584 (1975).
Cited 4 timesPublishedNorman J. Mulholland v. The United States
361 F.2d 237 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1966
Battelle v. United States, 7 Ct.Cl. 297, 300 (1871); L. E. Myers Co., Inc. v. United States, 64 F.Supp. 148 , 105 Ct.Cl. 459, 478 (1946); Empire Institute of Tailoring, Inc. v. … Oliver-Finnie Co. v.
Cited 26 timesPublished149 Ct. Cl. 15 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1960
Crocker v. United States, 130 C. Cls. 567 ; McGuire v. United States, 145 C. Cls. 17 . … As to the annual leave question, Hynning v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 486 , and McGuire v. United States, supra, are in point.
Cited 3 timesPublishedClark Mechanical Contractors v. United States
34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,283 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1987
William Schlosser Co. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1336, 1339 (Fed.Cir.1983); Skelly & Loy v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 370, 372 , 685 F.2d 414, 416 (1982), Theon v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 823, 825 (1982). … Upon receipt of a final decision, the plaintiff can either refile with this court or appeal to the Board of Contract Appeals.
Cited 3 timesPublishedStatesman Savings Holding Corp. v. United States
26 Cl. Ct. 904 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1992
Bank v. … Bank v.
Cited 34 timesPublished65 Ct. Cl. 321 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1928
All owners of land or other property taken were notified to appear before the Board of Valuation of *325 Commandeered Property of the Navy Department and present their claims for compensation. … Defendant denies the right of plaintiff to recover in any sum, under the authority of the case of Bailey and Fulgham v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 77 .
Cited 3 timesPublished104 F. Supp. 1015 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1952
Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. S. 8 . … Gypsum Co. was apparently not making any shipments of the board in that locality; that no other manufacturer had been found to supply the material; that by July 9 plaintiff would be ready to go ahead with the plastering but
Cited 4 timesPublishedAmerican President Lines, Ltd. v. United States
33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,376 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 23, 1986
See Stark v. Wickard, 321 U.S. 288 , 64 S.Ct. 559 , 88 L.Ed. 733 (1944); Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 , 66 S.Ct. 637 , 90 L.Ed. 718 (1946). … Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358, 369 , 66 S.Ct. 637, 643 , 90 L.Ed. 718 (1946); Burnet v.
Cited 3 timesPublished314 F.2d 515 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1963
Previously, there had been holdings that such receipts as the “Pot O’ Gold” radio giveaway, Washburn v. Commissioner, 5 T.C. 1333 , and the Ross Essay Prize, McDermott v. Commissioner, 80 U.S. App. … Your case is being forwarded to the Office of Industrial Belations for review by the Navy Incentives Award Board for consideration for additional award commensurate with the savings effected.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna