Case law

Armstrong v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 966 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1982

See, e.g., Baker v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 668 (1980); Powers v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 553 (1976). … As the district court held in this case, this claim is barred by Feres v.

Custer v. United States

622 F.2d 554 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1980

OPINION OF TRIAL JUDGE BROWNE, Trial Judge: This is an action brought by Willard R. … See Reynolds v. Needle, 132 F.2d 161, 162 (D.C. Cir. 1942); Carroll v. Pittsburgh Steel Co., 103 F. Supp. 788, 790 (W.D. Penn. 1952).

Fixel v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 353 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1992

Council, Inc. v. Peterson, slip op. at 2. … Cameron v. United States, 252 U.S. 450, 456, 460, 40 S.Ct. 410, 411, 412 , 64 L.Ed. 659 (1920) (no mining claim could be shown after date land closed to mining); Brown v.

Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States

59 F. Supp. 122 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1945

C. is liable for costs, as other litigants are, Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. J. G. … In the case of John Morrell & Co. v.

Kandall v. United States

186 Ct. Cl. 900 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1969

(Erenreich v. U.S. Ct. Cls. #34-62, January 24, 1964.) Accordingly, the Board finds no procedural violation as alleged. … United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520, 548-51 (1961). Revenue agents especially must be “above board, in all their dealings with the taxpaying public.” Liotta v. United States, supra, 174 Ct.

Miller v. United States

620 F.2d 812 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1980

Scaling measures the number of board feet of lumber in a log. … Intermountain Terminal Co., 164 Colo. 354 , 435 P.2d 391 (1968); Jones v. Providence Redevelopment Agency, 92 R.I. 285 , 168 A.2d 156 (1961); contra Board of Education v.

Baca v. United States

150 Ct. Cl. 70 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1960

Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 137 ; Armour & Co. v. Wantock, 323 U.S. 126, 133 ; Missouri K. and T. Ry. Co. v. United States, 231 U.S. 112, 119 . … the plaintiffs Jose V.

Farwell Co. v. United States

115 F. Supp. 477 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1953

Cls. 398, 462-463 ; Binghampton Construction Co. v. United States, 123 C. … Loftis v. United States, 110 C Cls. 551, 628, and cases there cited. Great care is to be exercised in granting motions for summary judgment, Deohler Metal Furniture Co. v. United States, 149 F. 2d 130, 135 (C.

Scott v. United States

4 Ct. Cl. 241 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1868

V. Tenney. “ Henby T. Noble, “ Colonel ancl AssH Quartermaster TI. S. V. “ Thomas Habbis. “ Chables G. Soott.” … -Louis, to be transported thence to Fort Smith and Fort Gibson; and on the way to their • destination the vessels having- the supplies and troops on board touched at Little Book, but did not discharge there. ■ • While the

Merchants' Exchange Co. v. United States

15 Ct. Cl. 270 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1879

This court so held in the case of Albert Wood v. The United States ( 10 C. Cls. R., 395 ). But tbat is not tbe present case. … (Paul v. Brown, 6 Esp., 34; Nowell v. Davies, 5 B. & Ad., 368.) Tbe deposition of tbe surety was properly admitted in evidence, notwithstanding tbe objection. On tbe merits of tbe case tbe facts are these.

Raylaine Worsteds, Inc. v. United States

146 F. Supp. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1956

Raylaine Worsteds, Inc., v. United States, 119 Ct.Cl. 838 . … See also Whitfield v. Sears, 233 Iowa 887 , 10 N.W.2d 564 ; Star Bottling Co. v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co., 240 Mo. 634 , 144 S.W. 776 .

Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,307 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1992

Co. v. … Instead, the court found that the plaintiffs increased wage costs were due to the Board’s specific order directed at a particular contract. Id. at 797, 75 F.Supp. 221 . Plaintiff also cites Freedman v.

Burton v. United States

229 Ct. Cl. 771 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1982

After being denied relief by the Board for Correction of Naval Records, the Torts Claims Division of the Office of the Judge Advocate General, and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, plaintiff, … Ramsey v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 1042 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1068 (1979); Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974); Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.

Samples v. United States

135 Ct. Cl. 548 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Poggas v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 385 ; Parmenter v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 35 ; Nelson v. United States, 126 C. Cls. 553 ; Samples, et al. [In case of Hugh G. Savage] v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 797 . … The first suits filed by members of the nonoperating group were those of Poggas v. United States, filed March 19, 1947, and Parmenter v. United States, No. 48567, and Nelson v.

Bowles Lunch, Inc. v. United States

33 F. Supp. 235 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1940

The regulation has been approved and applied by the Board of Tax Appeals. Home State Bank v. Commissioner, 15 B.T.A. 121 ; Henry Heldt v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 1035 . … The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, in Helvering v. Missouri State Life Ins.

Greene County Farmers Sales Ass'n v. United States

55 F. Supp. 123 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1944

Co. v. … Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 205 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 . The allowance of deductions from gross or net income does not turn on general equitable considerations. Deputy, Administratrix, et al., v.

Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. The United States

426 F.2d 376 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1970

See, Scheuber v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 371 F.2d 996 (7th Cir. 1967); Heller Trust v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 382 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1967); Municipal Bond Corp. v. … Plaintiff refers us to Arrowsmith v.

Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States

209 Ct. Cl. 653 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1976

After the Board rejected this contention, 1 plaintiff argued it again to this court in Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States (Ct. Cl. No. 222-58), 154 Ct. … Farwell Co. v. United States, supra.

Froudi v. United States

23 Cl. Ct. 328 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1991

This analysis “begins and ends with the guiding principle that absent ambiguous language or clearly contrary legislative intent, a statute is construed in accord with its plain meaning,” Brown v. … Lariscey, 861 F.2d at 1270 , citing Lassiter v.

Shook v. United States

38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,424 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 28, 1992

See, e.g., Inland Service Corp. v. … Wilson Corp. v.