Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

2.67s

  • Shepherd v. United States

    113 F. Supp. 648 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1953

    Bein v. United States, 101 C. Cls. 144 ; Eastern Contracting Co. v. United States, 97 C. Cls. 341 ; P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. United States, 92 C. Cls. 280 . … Plaintiff filed a petition for reconsideration of the Board’s action, but the Board denied the request for reconsideration. 94.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States

    37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,307 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1992

    Co. v. … Instead, the court found that the plaintiffs increased wage costs were due to the Board’s specific order directed at a particular contract. Id. at 797, 75 F.Supp. 221 . Plaintiff also cites Freedman v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. The United States, 998 F.2d 953 (1993)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Kalvar Corp. v. United States

    543 F.2d 1298 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1976

    Librach v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 605, 612 (1959). … The distinction recognized in Acme Process is consistent with the position espoused by the Boards of Contract Appeals.

    Cited 213 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. United States

    23 F. Supp. 130 · United States Court of Claims · May 2, 1938

    Selden v. Heiner, D.C., 12 F.2d 474 ; Peyton Du-Pont Securities Co. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 66 F.2d 718 ; United States v. S. S. White Dental Mfg. Co., 274 U.S. 398 , 47 S.Ct. 598 , 71 L.Ed. 1120 . … Montgomery v. Commissioner, 37 B.T.A. 232 , decision promulgated February 1, 1938.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • San Carlos Irrigation & Drainage District v. United States

    15 Cl. Ct. 197 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 28, 1988

    On April 3, 1973, the Board of Directors of the San Carlos District approved the installation of concrete flashboard spillway gates. … Nonetheless, in Nutt v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 345, 350-51 (1987), aff'd sub nom. Smithson v.

    Reversed on other grounds by San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United States, 877 F.2d 957 (1989)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Leonard J. Ganse v. The United States

    376 F.2d 900 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1967

    Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 4, 16-18 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965). … Lawrenson v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 790 , 139 Ct.Cl. 370, 372 (1957), and cases cited; Nordstrom v. United States, 342 F.2d 55, 60 , 169 Ct.Cl. 632, 639 (1965).

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Bolding v. United States

    565 F.2d 663 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 16, 1977

    Vernor was president of Vernor Manufacturing and a member of its board. … United States v. Leuschner, 336 F.2d 246 (9th *167 Cir. 1964); Monday v. United States, supra; Fitzgerald v. United States, supra at 1136.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. United States

    194 Ct. Cl. 889 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

    Payment of overtime to wage-board employees; computation. … Albright v. United States, 161 Ct.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith-Douglas Co., Inc. v. United States

    116 F. Supp. 570 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1953

    On June 13, 1949 the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of United States v. Cors, 337 U.S. 325 , 69 S.Ct. 1086 , 93 L.Ed. 1392 . … The Army and Navy Munitions Board listed and classified these commodities, but all purchases of them were made by civilian importers.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hero Lands Co. v. United States

    554 F. Supp. 1262 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1983

    For example, in the case of Aaron v. … Davis v. United States, 155 Ct.Cl. 418, 420-22 , 295 F.2d 931, 932-34 (1961); Avery v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Samples v. United States

    135 Ct. Cl. 548 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

    Poggas v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 385 ; Parmenter v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 35 ; Nelson v. United States, 126 C. Cls. 553 ; Samples, et al. [In case of Hugh G. Savage] v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 797 . … The first suits filed by members of the nonoperating group were those of Poggas v. United States, filed March 19, 1947, and Parmenter v. United States, No. 48567, and Nelson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. United States

    65 Ct. Cl. 139 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1928

    Under the provisions of said proclamation plaintiffs presented to the Board of Valuation of Commandeered Property of the Navy Department a claim for just compensation, and was awarded the sum of $330, which plaintiffs declined … United States v. Grizzard, 219 U. S. 180, 183 ; United States v. Welch, 217 U. S. 333, 339 ; Campbell v. United States, 266 U. S. 368, 369 ; see also Sharp v. United States, 191 U. S. 341 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson's Administrator v. United States

    10 Ct. Cl. 414 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1874

    In the case of Gutman & Stuart v. The United States ( 18 Wall., 84 , 9 C. Cls. … In Farnsworth v. Garrard (1 Camp., 38) the action was assumpsit and the count was a quantum meruit for building a wall, and the defense was that the wall was so out of the perpendicular that it was liable to fall.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ring Construction Corp. v. United States

    102 F. Supp. 569 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1952

    Electrical Motors, Inc. v. Jones, 153 F. 2d 134 , Blanchard Machinery Co. v. Board, 177 F. 2d 727 , and Ring Construction Co. v. … The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held, French v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 182 F. 2d 560 , that the Courts of Appeals have no jurisdiction at all in such cases.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Roflan Co. v. United States

    29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,549 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1982

    Plaintiff has submitted to the court a motion to remand this case to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (asbca) in order to enable plaintiff to ask for a new hearing and decision on the basis of "after-discovered … Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 379 (1977); Flett v. W. A. Alexander & Co., 302 F.2d 321 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 841 (1962).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. United States

    173 Ct. Cl. 561 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1965

    In that case the Navy Board said, “It seems to be well settled that trials on appeal to this Board are de novo.” … In Virginia Engineering Co., Inc. v. United States, 101 Ct.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kinetic Structures Corp. v. United States

    31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,108 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 29, 1983

    Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); United States v. … Keco Industries, Inc. v. United States, 192 Ct.Cl. 773 , 428 F.2d 1233 (1970); Heyer Products Co. v. United States, 135 Ct.Cl. 63 , 140 F.Supp. 409 (1956); see also Keco Industries, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States

    209 Ct. Cl. 653 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1976

    After the Board rejected this contention, 1 plaintiff argued it again to this court in Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States (Ct. Cl. No. 222-58), 154 Ct. … Farwell Co. v. United States, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cofield v. United States

    25 Cl. Ct. 465 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 27, 1992

    See Lariscey v. … Cf Chambers v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Blandin v. United States

    35 Ct. Cl. 568 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1900

    Blandin was a lieutenant, junior grade, on board of said steamer. … It is insisted by the defendants that the case comes within the law announced by this and the Supreme Court in the case of Swan v. The United States ( 19 C. Cls.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.