Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
0.68s
169 Ct. Cl. 180 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965
As to the first contention: The Supreme Court in Keim v. … In Vitarelli v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedA. S. Epstein v. The United States
357 F.2d 928 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1966
Harter as president, to the membership committee and to the Board of Directors, in actuality, Harter was an employee of plaintiff, there was no membership committee, and there was no Board of Directors. … White v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJulius H. Schmidt, Jr. v. The United States
427 F.2d 720 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1970
Plaintiff, in support of his claim, relies upon Whelpley v. United States, 119 Ct.Cl. 56 (1951); Terry v. United States, 101 F.Supp. 165 , 120 Ct.Cl. 315 (1951); Ainsworth v. … Plaintiff also relies upon Vitarelli v. United States, 279 F.2d 878 , 150 Ct.Cl. 59 (1960). The Vitarelli case was decided on the basis of Hynning v.
Cited 3 timesPublished203 Ct. Cl. 285 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1973
July19,1972 — The CSC Board of Appeals and Review sustained the Appeals Examining Office decision (against plaintiff). … Kingdom v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 518 (1969); Burton v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 172 , 404 F. 2d 365 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1002 (1969); Madison v. United States, 174 Ct.
Cited 15 timesPublished22 Ct. Cl. 293 · United States Court of Claims · May 9, 1887
On board ship, paymasters’ clerks are quartered and mess with officers, and are everywhere treated as such, whether at sea or on shore. *299 In United States v. … (United States v. Temple, 105 U. S. R., 97 ; United States v. Graham, 110 id., 219 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Ct. Cl. 305 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1879
The decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished81 F. Supp. 734 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 3, 1949
There is cited as authority the following cases: Brown v. Anderson, 77 Cal. 236 , 19 Pac. 487 ; Williams v. Bagnelle, 138 Cal. 699 , 72 Pac. 408 ; Grant v. Mattox, 15 Mees. & W. 737; Knode v. … Baldridge, 73 Ind. 54 ; Inhabitants of Paris v. Inhabitants of Hiram, 12 Mass. 262 ; Thornton v. Boyd, 25 Miss. 598 . The District Court of Appeals of California in Guy v. Brennan, 60 Cal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBlinderman Construction Co. v. United States
35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,716 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 8, 1989
Grimberg Co. v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 452, 456 (1985) (quoting Enrico Roman, Inc. v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 104, 106 (1983)), aff'd mem., 785 F.2d 325 (Fed.Cir.1985); see also Monarch Painting Corp. v. … In Bateson the board emphasized two key facts that do not appear in this case.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEastport Steamship Corporation v. The United States
372 F.2d 1002 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1967
of the Currency, Federal Aviation Agency, Federal Communications Commission, Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Federal Power Commission, Federal Reserve Board, Interstate Commerce Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission … Gibbons v.
Abrogated in part, on other grounds by Emily Malone D/B/A Precision Cabinet Company v. The United States, 849 F.2d 1441 (1988)Cited 1,052 timesPublished345 F.2d 558 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965
Federal drop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947); Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389 (1917); Byrne Organization, Inc. v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 578 (1961). … Burge v. Commissioner, 233 F. 2d 765 (4th Cir. 1958); G lickman v. Commissioner, 256 F. 2d. 108 (2d Cir. 1958); Weil v. Commissioner, 252 F. 2d 805 (2d Cir. 1958); Abbott v.
Cited 57 timesPublished21 Cont. Cas. Fed. 84,081 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1975
Cl. 472 , 458 F. 2d 1364 (1972); Chris Berg, Inc. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 389 , 404 F. 2d 364 (1968); J. A. Jones Constr. Co. v. United States, 182 Ct. Cl. 615 , 390 F. 2d 886 (1968); Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. … National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 247 , 419 F. 2d 863 (1969).
Cited 1 timesPublishedLane Industries, Inc. v. United States
162 F. Supp. 443 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1958
Staudt is president, general manager, and a member of the board of directors of Lane III. … Pantex Pressing Machine Co. v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 735 (1947); Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States, 256 U. S. 655 (1921).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMoran Bros., Inc. v. The United States
346 F.2d 590 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965
This position has been taken by several, if not all, of the contract appeals boards; see e. g., Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., 1962 BCA 17110 (ASBCA 1962). We do not agree that this provision may never be waived. … Coat & Suit Corp. v. United States, 180 F.Supp. 400 , 148 Ct.Cl. 296 (1960), and Poloron Products, Inc. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedRudco Oil & Gas Co. v. United States
82 F. Supp. 746 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1949
On September 30, 1943, the plaintiff’s board of directors, consisting of Mr. and Mrs. … Helvering v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMaryland Savings-Share Insurance v. United States
644 F.2d 16 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1981
Election to membership requires a favorable vote by a majority of plaintiffs board of directors. … Pollak v. Commissioner, 209 F.2d 57 (3d Cir. 1954); Edwards v. Allen, 216 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. 1954); Cudlip v. Commissioner, 220 F.2d 565 (6th Cir. 1955). Bolling v.
Cited 8 timesPublished228 Ct. Cl. 765 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1981
Subsequently, the Office of Appeals Review of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), denied plaintiffs request for review of the CSC’s decision. … Cooper v. United States (MSPB No. AT752B7790411), dated March 25, 1981. We concur. The decision of the MSPB is neither arbitrary nor capricious, and is supported by substantial evidence.
Cited 0 timesPublished202 Ct. Cl. 1126 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1973
In October 1971 plaintiff submitted application to the Board for Correction of Naval Becords to have his records corrected and in J anuary 1972 they were corrected to show retirement for service-connected disability. … Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, on the basis of the decision by this court in Ray v. United States, 197 Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished175 F. Supp. 169 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1959
Plaintiff appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, which Board in turn dismissed the contractor’s appeal and this suit resulted. … Mason & Hanger Co. v. United, States, 56 C. Cls. 238 . The fact that the facilities were never used is collateral to the issue.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCity of Manassas Park v. United States
633 F.2d 181 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1980
State Water Control Board v. Train, 559 F.2d 921 (4th Cir. 1977). Therfore, as a practical matter, UOSA had no real option, it *519 says, but to agree with whatever EPA proposed. … Smalley & Sons, Inc. v. United States, supra.
Cited 26 timesPublished36 Ct. Cl. 236 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1901
The petition then goes on to state that this court-martial was convened on board the U. S. S. Texas April 14, 1897, and that the claimant was absent from the court during- one day’s proceedings. … The claimant also cites the decision of the Supreme Court in Lewis v. United States ( 146 U. S.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna