Case law

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United States

525 F.2d 1380 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975

Tucker v. Alexander, *587 275 U.S. 228 (1927); Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Riddell, 493 F. 2d 948 (9th Cir. 1974); Brown v. United States, 427 F. 2d 57 (9th Cir. 1970); Mennen Co. v. … Our decision in this matter is consistent with that of Brown v.

Hannum v. United States

36 Ct. Cl. 99 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1901

In the case of United States v. Barnett ( 165 U. … As was stated in the case of United States v. Symonds ( 120 U.

Ekco Products Co. v. United States

312 F.2d 768 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1963

CHANGES v *j£ »{* iji (e). … Ekco Products Company v.

Shirley Construction Corp. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,155 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 7, 1991

See Shelly & Loy v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 370, 376 , 685 F.2d 414, 418 (1982); Donald M. Drake Co. v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 518, 519 (1987). … Lehman, Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 11, 15, 673 F.2d 352, 355 (1982).

McGowan v. United States

48 Ct. Cl. 95 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1913

Monadnock, and, in accordance with the recommendation of a medical board of survey, will proceed to your home, reporting your arrival by letter to the Navy Department. “ Very respectfully, “ J. C. … We find, however, that this question was determined by the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Phisterer ( 94 U.

Volk v. United States

120 Ct. Cl. 57 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1951

The only act of the defendant which possibly could be construed as a taking was-the issuance by the War Production Board of Limitation .Order L-230, which prohibited the sale, transfer or delivery of military arms. … In Oro Fino Consolidated Mines, Inc. v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 18 , we held that such an order did not constitute a taking. See also St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 271 , certiorari denied, 335 U.

Kelly v. United States

96 F. Supp. 611 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1951

This Court, in a dictum in Adams v. United States, 42 C. Cls. 191, 212 , in 1907 agreed with those rulings. … Townsley v. United States, 101 C. Cls. 237 , affirmed 323 U. S. *211 557 ; Hearne v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 335 ; Gray v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 661 ; Poggas v.

Kansas City Southern Transport Co. v. United States

11 Cl. Ct. 484 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 23, 1986

. § 228a et seq., by an Opinion of the General Counsel of the Railroad Retirement Board. In 1978, KCST received an identical Opinion. … Kaufman v.

Ahearn v. United States

142 Ct. Cl. 309 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1958

Cls. 577 , and Collins v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 573 . … Bulot, et al. v. Freeport Sulphur Co. Inc., 45 F. Supp. 380 .

Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States

72 Ct. Cl. 563 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1931

Co. v. United States, 15 C. … Co. v. United States, 93 U.

United States Cartridge Co. v. United States

48 F.2d 983 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1931

The Board of Tax Appeals in the ease of Marigold Garden Co. v. Commissioner, 6 B. T. … A. 119; National City Bank of Seattle v. United States, 64 Ct. Cl. 236 ; Id., 276 U. S. 620 , 48 S. Ct. 301 , 72 L. Ed. 735 . We think a decided difference obtains between this ease and the case of Burnet v.

A.S. McGaughan Co. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,239 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1991

The boring logs revealed the soil as predominately brown and gray micaceous, silty sand. According to Military Standards (MIL-STD) 619B, this soil is classified as “SM.” … The Geotech logs revealed the soil as predominately brown and gray micaceous, silty sand.

Morse Arms Manufacturing Co. v. United States

16 Ct. Cl. 296 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1880

to be appointed by tbe Secretary of War; that tbe board recommended tbe Springfield system, wbicb embraces tbe said inventions; and that by tbe act of Congress, supplemented by tbe action of tbe board after trial as contemplated … (Harlow v. Putnam, 124 Mass., 553 ; also Jones v. Burnham and Marsh v. Dodge, ubi sup.) . 5.

Weinberger v. U.S. Postal Service

229 Ct. Cl. 612 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 20, 1981

*613 Petitioner, pro se, 1 seeks review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) which ruled that the MSPB was without jurisdiction to hear petitioner’s appeal of his discharge from the United States Postal … Brewer v. United States, 227 Ct. Cl. 276, 279 , 647 F.2d 1093, 1096 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1144 (1982), citing Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 299 (1938).

Kenny v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 328 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1926

It is admitted that plaintiff, as far as the loss is concerned, was free from any fault or negligence, and a board of officers so found. … This court in Hedrick v. United States, 16 C. Cls. 88, 104 , held, construing section 1766, that where an employee is not liable to the Government nothing can be deducted from his compensation.

Litchfield Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

338 F.2d 94 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1964

See Peter Kiewit & Son Co., Inc. v. United States, 151 F.Supp. 726 , 731, 138 Ct.Cl. 668, 674-675 (1957) and cases cited therein. 12 Cf. Commerce International Co., Inc. v. … See Donnell-Zane Co. v. United States, 75 Ct.Cl. 368 (1932); Brundage v. United States, 66 Ct.Cl. 708 (1929).

Albin v. United States

120 F. Supp. 763 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1954

There' are nine plaintiffs in this case, and the Government, yielding to our decisions in Marr v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 474 , cert. den. 345 U. S. 956 , and Andrews v. United States, 126 C. … the settlement of public accounts, shall be final and conclusive upon the Executive Branch of the Government, except that any person whose accounts may have been settled, the head of the Executive Department, or of the board

Putschoegl v. United States

165 Ct. Cl. 65 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 13, 1964

Plaintiff appealed to the Civil Service Commission’s Board of Appeals and Eeview. … In O'Brien v. United States, 151 Ct.

Griffiths v. United States

74 Ct. Cl. 245 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1932

The board's determination settled any compensation due on this account. … Plack et al. v. United States, 66 C. Cls. 641 .

Elmers v. United States

172 Ct. Cl. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

The facts in this case in many ways resemble those in Gordon v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 31 , 180 F. … Councils or boards of welfare and sundry funds.— a.In addition to the council prescribed for central post funds (par. 9c (2) ), there will be a council or board for each of the following classes of funds: * * *. ***** (3)