Case law

Maryland Casualty Company v. United States

141 F. Supp. 900 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

See Hardin County Savings Bank v. United States, supra, 102 Ct.Cl. 815 ; Central National Bank of Richmond v. United States, 84 F.Supp. 654 , 114 Ct.Cl. 390 . In Arlington Trust Co., Inc., v. … In McElrath v.

Cherry Hill Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,030 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 18, 1985

Co. v. … The boards that made up the three laminated layers of the panels were glued together so that there were hollow spaces in the middle layer and spaces between the boards in a corrugated pattern which made up the side of the

Bonnafon v. United States

14 Ct. Cl. 484 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1878

(Brown's Case, 6 C. Cls. R., 171 ; O’ Grady’s Case, 8 id., 451, affirmed on appeal, 22 Wall., 641 , and 10 C. Cls. R., 134 .) … (Gratiot v. United States, 15 Pet., 370 ; McKnight's Case, 13 C. Cls. R., 306 , affirmed on appeal, 98 U. S., 179 , and 14 C. Cls. R., .), On the 3d of March, 1875, by act of that date, ch. 149 (18 Stat.

Garrard Johnson v. United States

280 F.2d 856 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1960

Plaintiff relies on United States v. … Justice Jackson in Orloff v.

Holt-Fairchild Co. v. United States

111 F. Supp. 930 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1953

See also Cowhig v. National Military Establishment, 109 F. Supp. 519, 521 (D. C. 1953) ; Stephens-Brown, Inc. v. United States, 81 F. Supp. 969, 971 (Mo. 1949) ; McGann Mfg. Co. v. United States, 98 F. … Evans v. United States, supra; Fogarty v. United States, supra.

Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. The United States

394 F.2d 990 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1968

The defendant through the Federal Maritime Board, 1 subsequently entered into a subsidy contract (FMB-22) on December 31, 1952. … Reg. 7315 (1961)), the Secretary of Commerce succeeded to the Board’s powers and duties under the Merchant Marine Act of 1936.

Pittson

506 F.2d 1406 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 25, 1974

The Civil Service 'Commission Board of Appeals and Review sustained plaintiff’s removal. … Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, on the basis of the decisions by this court in Angrisani v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 439 (1965), and Grover v.

Talbot v. United States

7 Ct. Cl. 417 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1871

Williams v. New England Insurance Company. (United States Circuit Court, Boston, May Term, 1860, per Clifford, J.) This case is plainly distinguishable from Beybold’s, (5 C. Cls. … Taking the survey of the naval board as a guide, we fix the repairs of the vessel at $1,500; her .permanent depreciation in value at $500; and the service of her voyage from Beaufort to Hampton Bo ads at $128.

Jacobson v. United States

118 Ct. Cl. 327 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1951

There was nothing on board them in the way of sails. The rigs were in bad shape. The topmast had been removed. They looked so bad I wouldn’t say they were worth repairing. They had no commercial value. … In other words, any cargo in bulk could be destroyed before extensive repairs were made to the hull. *)• V $ ^ »1: As I said, I know of no value or purpose that this vessel could have been used for without prohibitive cost

Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. United States

40 Ct. Cl. 33 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1904

(United States v. Lynah, 188 U. S., 445 .) … The estimate of the army board does not materially differ from the estimate of the court.

El Paso & Southwestern Railroad v. United States

55 Ct. Cl. 472 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 25, 1920

The mules were placed on board the cars at Davis, Calif., and a caretaker, Harry Sweitzer, was placed by the defendants in charge of the same. … Co. v. Johnson, 75 Ala., 596 ; Fordyce v. McFlynn, 56 Ark., 424; Bowie v. Baltimore, etc., R. R. Co., 1 MacArthur (D. C.), 94; Newby v. Chicago, etc., R. R. Co., 19 Mo. App., 391 ; Missouri, etc., R. R. Co. v.

Field Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

348 F.2d 485 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

Brown v. … Commissioner v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp., 293 F. 2d 628 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 976 (1962); Simplified Tax Records, Inc., 41 T.C. 75, 79 (1963). The taxpayer in Brown v.

Moran Bros. v. United States

39 Ct. Cl. 486 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1904

The ship, upon its completion, was to be inspected by a board of officers appointed by the Secretary of War. … It comes within the principle of law announced in the case of Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. The United States ( 36 C. Cls. R., 108 ).

Morris

199 Ct. Cl. 1013 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 27, 1972

Plaintiff contested the removal administratively; the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Eeview sustained the removal on June 3, 1965. … Cl. 657, 662-64 , 392 F. 2d 980, 983-84 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 438 ; Gerstein v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 633 , 364 F. 2d 850 (1966); and Alpert v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 810 , 820-21 )1963)).

Kingdon v. United States

187 Ct. Cl. 518 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 11, 1969

On appeal, the Civil Service Commission’s Board of Appeals and Eeview, by an opinion dated March 31,1966, affirmed the decision of its Eegional Office both on procedural and substantive grounds. … Harris v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 425, 432 (1961).

Paul Varkell and Hyman Nutkis, a Partnership, T/a Pavcor Company v. The United States

334 F.2d 653 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1964

Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 8-62, decided Nov. 15, 1963, 324 F.2d 509 ; American Auto Parts Co., Inc. v. United States, Ct.Cl., No. 120-57, decided June 7, 1963; Montreal Securities, Inc. v. … Silverton, 200 F.2d 824, 828 (C.A. 1, 1952); Standard Magnesium Corp. v. United States, 241 F.2d 677, 679 (C.A. 10, 1957)). Krupp v.

Philadelphia Boiler Works v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 311 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1929

Each claim was at different times presented to and rejected by the Board of Contract Adjustment of the War Department, and in neither case was any appeal taken from that decision to the Secretary of War. … See United States Bedding Co. v. United States, 55 C. Cls. 459 . The petition should be dismissed, and it is so ordered. Sinnott, Judge; Geeen, Judge; Moss, Judge; and Booth, Chief Justice, concur.

Mackey v. United States

47 Ct. Cl. 121 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1911

Barnes et al. v. District of Columbia, 22 C. Cls. R., 366, 394 ; 30 Ib., 504. By the subsequent act of February 13, 1895, 28 Stats., 664, recovery by claimants was provided for at increased “ board rates.” … Barnes v. District of Columbia, No. 47; Daniel J. Ritchie v. District of Columbia, No. 47.

W. H. Edwards Engineering Corp. v. United States

161 Ct. Cl. 322 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1963

See, e.g., Lilley-Ames Co. v. United States, 154 Ct. Cl. 544, 548 (1961), 293 F. 2d 630, 632 ; Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 876, 878 , 166 F. … Cramp & Sons v. United States, 216 U.S. 494 (1910) ; Continental Illinois National Bank v. United States, 126 Ct. Cl. 631, 640 , 115 F. Supp. 892, 897 (1953).

St. Luke's Medical Center v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 322 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1991

See also on a closely related problem, Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 [ 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 ] (1976). … Ass’n v.