Case law

Vickers Petroleum Co. v. United States

64 F. Supp. 469 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1946

the stipulated facts show, plaintiff irrevocably set aside on its books of account the sum of $22,400 in a bond retirement fund reserve in accordance with the written agreement of September 3,1935, and the action of its Board … Helvering v. Ohio Leather Co., 317 U. S. 102, 106, 107 ; Hobbs-Western Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 133 Fed. (2d) 165, 167; Valentine-Clark Corp. v.

Choctaw Nation v. United States

21 Ct. Cl. 59 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1886

In June, 1833 (finding v), Mr. … (Andrews v. Lyons, 11 Allen, 349 ; Lousenburg v. Depew, 28 Barbour, 44; Waters, appealed, 35 Pa. St., 523; Babcock v. Pary, 8 Ohio St., 270 ; State v. Pepper, 31 Ind., 78 .)

Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,314 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1987

Miller v. Robertson, 266 U.S. 243, 251 , 45 S.Ct. 73, 76 , 69 L.Ed. 265 (1924). See also Alvin Ltd. v. … See Thanet Corp. v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 75, 82 , 591 F.2d 629, 633 (1979); Kenneth Reed Constr. Corp. v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 282, 289 , 475 F.2d 583, 587 (1973); Firestone Tire & Rubber v.

Doyle v. United States

47 Ct. Cl. 356 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 1, 1912

Marine Corps: Provided, That the pay of boatswain, gunners, carpenters, and sailmakers shall be the same as that now allowed by law: Provided further, That nothing in this act shall give additional rights to quarters on board … S., 396 ) and Adamson v. United States ( 19 C. Cls., 623, 629 ) are cited.

Little River Lumber Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,945 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1990

feet (500 board feet per cord instead of 333 board feet per cord). … In Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v.

Weeks Dredging & Contracting, Inc. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,356 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 28, 1987

Bonner v. MSPB, 781 F.2d 202, 205 (Fed.Cir.1986); W.M. Scholosser Co., Inc. v. United States, 767 F.2d 870, 873 (Fed.Cir.1985); P.J. Maffei Bldg. Wrecking Corp. v. … Silty Sand”, “Brown Clayey Sand,” or “Brown Poorly Graded Gravel,” and they were positioned on the log to correspond to the specific strata of the boring core diagram.

American National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,871 · United States Court of Claims · May 30, 1990

Rather, plaintiffs claim, these cases and Tecom v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 936-37 (Fed. Cir.1984) and Metric Constr. Co. v. … First, although Senior Judge Bennett, writing for the panel, stated it rejected the board’s determination that the claims had not been certified, he stressed the lack of discussion on this point in the board’s decision.

Martin v. United States

81 Ct. Cl. 622 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1935

Freeland v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 364, 367 . It is equally difficult *627 “to standardize the facts which disclose a condition designated in the law as ‘chief support.’ ” In the case of Rieger v. … We think the case of Odlin v. United States, 74 C. Cls. 633 , holds *628 to the contrary, and that the contention of plaintiff is untenable.

New Orleans Stevedoring Co. v. United States

185 Ct. Cl. 604 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1968

Eailroad car unloading shall include the breaking of seals, opening and closing of car doors, removal 'of cargo from the cars to pallet boards and tiering at place of rest, as designated by the Contracting Officer within … Digging and v/nrigging.

Western Shade Cloth Co. v. United States

58 F.2d 863 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1932

Philipsborn v. United States, 53 F.(2d) 133 , 72 Ct. Cl. 545 . … Oak Worsted Mills v. United States, 36 F.(2d) 529 , 68 Ct.

Holt-Fairchild Co. v. United States

111 F. Supp. 930 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1953

See also Cowhig v. National Military Establishment, 109 F. Supp. 519, 521 (D. C. 1953) ; Stephens-Brown, Inc. v. United States, 81 F. Supp. 969, 971 (Mo. 1949) ; McGann Mfg. Co. v. United States, 98 F. … Evans v. United States, supra; Fogarty v. United States, supra.

Shurtleff v. United States

36 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1901

In the case of Parsons v. The United States ( 167 U. S., 324, 343 ), affirming the judgment of this court (30 C. Cls. … The claimant had been informed through the Secretary of the Treasury, as set forth in finding iii, that “the President deems it his duty to make some changes in the personnel of the Board of General Appraisers,” and to that

Adams v. United States

680 F.2d 746 · United States Court of Claims · May 19, 1982

Trial was held before Trial Judge Browne, who submitted recommended findings of fact and a proposed opinion. … United States v. Brondum, 272 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1959). Accord, Dolezal v. City of Cedar Rapids, 209 N.W. 2d 84, 87, 94-97 (Iowa 1973) (discussion of the distinction). United States v. Brondum, 272 F.2d at 644 .

Chicago Cheese & Farm Products Co. v. United States

63 Ct. Cl. 648 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 6, 1927

the Secretary of Agriculture, and the decision of this board shall be final in the premises. ******* “ Sec. 18. … While we have given the plaintiff the benefit of Finding V, in our opinion the scope and plain intent of the act were to prevent imitations of natural cheese and save the public from purchasing imitations thereof, unless

FEC Liquidating Corp. v. United States

548 F.2d 924 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1977

On December 14, 1967, *348 plaintiff’s Board of Directors adopted a Plan of Complete Liquidation. … Pridemark, Inc. v. Commissioner, 345 F. 2d 35 , 41 (4th Cir. 1965).

Krapf v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 750 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1989

In 1975, Mechtron’s Board of Directors met to discuss revising the original buy-sell agreement. … Eli Lilly & Co. v.

Watson v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 763 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1986

In United States v. … The FEAA is now the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB). .

McNamara Construction of Manitoba, Ltd. v. United States

509 F.2d 1166 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1975

Co. v. United States, 179 Ct. … The set-aside contractor then applied to the Board for the same relief under Title II, but this request was denied by the Board.

Morris

199 Ct. Cl. 1013 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 27, 1972

Plaintiff contested the removal administratively; the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Eeview sustained the removal on June 3, 1965. … Cl. 657, 662-64 , 392 F. 2d 980, 983-84 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 438 ; Gerstein v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 633 , 364 F. 2d 850 (1966); and Alpert v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 810 , 820-21 )1963)).

Bromley Contracting Co. v. United States

596 F.2d 448 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1979

Ruggiero v. United States, supra; Chernick v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 498 , 372 F.2d 492 (1967). … In Ruggiero v.