Case law

Choctaw Nation v. United States

21 Ct. Cl. 59 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1886

In June, 1833 (finding v), Mr. … (Andrews v. Lyons, 11 Allen, 349 ; Lousenburg v. Depew, 28 Barbour, 44; Waters, appealed, 35 Pa. St., 523; Babcock v. Pary, 8 Ohio St., 270 ; State v. Pepper, 31 Ind., 78 .)

Nome Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States

652 F.2d 71 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1981

This claim was dismissed as one not properly before the Board. We find no authority entitling plaintiff to additional compensation. Although plaintiff claims 45 C.F.R. … Co. v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 599 , 372 F. 2d 1002 (1967) Carruth v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 422 , 627 F. 2d 1068 (1980); Walton v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 755 (1977).

Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States

513 F.2d 1355 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

As we held in Hartwig v. United States, 202 Ct. … The CDS program has been administered at various times by the Federal Maritime Board and the Maritime Administration, and these agencies are referred to in this opinion collectively as “Maritime”.

Thompson v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 516 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 1, 1926

See Gardner v. 99 Gold Coins, 111 Fed. 552 ; United States, v. Tyndale 116 Fed. 820 ; In re Moneys in Registry, 170 Fed. 470 ; Gibson v. United States, 166 U. S. 269 ; Hardin v. Jordan, 140 U. … The case of United States v. Benedict, 261 U. S. 294 , arose under the Lever Act, while the case of Brown v. United States, 263 U. S. 78 , arose under the provision of the reclamation act.

Clifton Products, Inc. v. The United States

416 F.2d 1263 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1969

Clifton Products, Inc. v. United States, 169 F.Supp. 511 , 144 Ct.Cl. 806 (1959). … United States v. Summerlin, 310 U.S. 414, 416 , 60 S.Ct. 1019 , 84 L.Ed. 1283 (1940).

Gulf + Western Precision Engineering Co.

24 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,292 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1978

See United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394, 419 (1960); Koppers/Clough v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 344, 364-65 (1973); Astro-Space Labs, Inc. v. United States, 200 Ct. … United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., supra, 384 U.S. at 419 .

Riverside Military Academy, Inc. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 756 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1952

Spreckles v. United States, 63 C. Cls. 64 . The plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant the ■aggregate of these amounts, or $45,666.67. … United States v. 37.15 Acres of Land, 77 F. Supp. 798, 805 .

Little River Lumber Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,945 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1990

feet (500 board feet per cord instead of 333 board feet per cord). … In Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v.

Harsel

224 Ct. Cl. 692 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1980

Military pay; promotions; passovers for promotion; illegal separations; selection boards without Reserve membership. — On June 13, 1980 the court filed orders entering judgments in favor of the plaintiffs in the above-identified … cases, pursuant to stipulations and the decision of the court in the case of Weise v.

Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,314 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1987

Miller v. Robertson, 266 U.S. 243, 251 , 45 S.Ct. 73, 76 , 69 L.Ed. 265 (1924). See also Alvin Ltd. v. … See Thanet Corp. v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 75, 82 , 591 F.2d 629, 633 (1979); Kenneth Reed Constr. Corp. v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 282, 289 , 475 F.2d 583, 587 (1973); Firestone Tire & Rubber v.

King

220 Ct. Cl. 696 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 15, 1979

Relying on Housing Corp. of America v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 705 , 468 F. 2d 922 (1972) and the order of June *698 22, 1978 in United Housing Corp. v. United States, 217 Ct. … Plaintiffs counter with the argument that on trial they can establish their right to recover under the principles laid down in Brown v. Lynn, 385 F. Supp. 986 (N.D. Ill., E.D. 1974) and United States v.

Weeks Dredging & Contracting, Inc. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,356 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 28, 1987

Bonner v. MSPB, 781 F.2d 202, 205 (Fed.Cir.1986); W.M. Scholosser Co., Inc. v. United States, 767 F.2d 870, 873 (Fed.Cir.1985); P.J. Maffei Bldg. Wrecking Corp. v. … Silty Sand”, “Brown Clayey Sand,” or “Brown Poorly Graded Gravel,” and they were positioned on the log to correspond to the specific strata of the boring core diagram.

American National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,871 · United States Court of Claims · May 30, 1990

Rather, plaintiffs claim, these cases and Tecom v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 936-37 (Fed. Cir.1984) and Metric Constr. Co. v. … First, although Senior Judge Bennett, writing for the panel, stated it rejected the board’s determination that the claims had not been certified, he stressed the lack of discussion on this point in the board’s decision.

New Orleans Stevedoring Co. v. United States

185 Ct. Cl. 604 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1968

Eailroad car unloading shall include the breaking of seals, opening and closing of car doors, removal 'of cargo from the cars to pallet boards and tiering at place of rest, as designated by the Contracting Officer within … Digging and v/nrigging.

Shurtleff v. United States

36 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1901

In the case of Parsons v. The United States ( 167 U. S., 324, 343 ), affirming the judgment of this court (30 C. Cls. … The claimant had been informed through the Secretary of the Treasury, as set forth in finding iii, that “the President deems it his duty to make some changes in the personnel of the Board of General Appraisers,” and to that

Martin v. United States

81 Ct. Cl. 622 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1935

Freeland v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 364, 367 . It is equally difficult *627 “to standardize the facts which disclose a condition designated in the law as ‘chief support.’ ” In the case of Rieger v. … We think the case of Odlin v. United States, 74 C. Cls. 633 , holds *628 to the contrary, and that the contention of plaintiff is untenable.

Mesa Ranch Partnership v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 700 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 21, 1983

Laney v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 519 , 661 F.2d 145, 147 (1981); Jentgen v. … Drakes Bay Land Co. v. United States, supra, 191 Ct.Cl. at 399-404 , 424 F.2d at 579-82 . In Hilkovsky v.

Chicago Cheese & Farm Products Co. v. United States

63 Ct. Cl. 648 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 6, 1927

the Secretary of Agriculture, and the decision of this board shall be final in the premises. ******* “ Sec. 18. … While we have given the plaintiff the benefit of Finding V, in our opinion the scope and plain intent of the act were to prevent imitations of natural cheese and save the public from purchasing imitations thereof, unless

FEC Liquidating Corp. v. United States

548 F.2d 924 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1977

On December 14, 1967, *348 plaintiff’s Board of Directors adopted a Plan of Complete Liquidation. … Pridemark, Inc. v. Commissioner, 345 F. 2d 35 , 41 (4th Cir. 1965).

Krapf v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 750 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1989

In 1975, Mechtron’s Board of Directors met to discuss revising the original buy-sell agreement. … Eli Lilly & Co. v.