Case law

Leslie F. Narum v. United States

287 F.2d 897 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 2, 1960

In Mullan v. … Mattox v.

Davis v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

20 Cl. Ct. 168 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1990

Davis v. Secretary, 19 Cl.Ct. 134, 144 (1989). … See Davis v. Secretary, 19 Cl.Ct. at 139 .

Tax Analysts v. United States

11 Cl. Ct. 802 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 24, 1987

Civil Aeronautics Board, 724 F.2d 211, 224 (D.C.Cir.1984) (refusing to award postage expenses under EAJA); Oliveira v. … See Russell v. National Mediation Board, 775 F.2d 1284, 1286 (5th Cir.1985).

Winn v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 227 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 27, 1982

United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 , 96 S.Ct. 948 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); Coleman v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 670-81C (order entered April 23, 1982). … Plaintiff cites, for example, Greenway v.

Ross Electric Construction Co. v. United States

77 F. Supp. 749 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1948

On December 26, 1942, the War Production Board issued and filed in the Federal Eegister Order L-235, a part of which dealt with the shortage in supply of aluminum, copper, iron and steel, and which placed a general limitation … Froemming Bros., Inc., v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 193 ; Gothwaite v. United States, 102 C. Cls. 400, Barbour v. United States, 104 C. Cls. 360 .

Hofer v. United States

64 Ct. Cl. 672 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1928

It is distinctly different from that of Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden, 263 U. … Its property was controlled by a board selected by its members, and the stipulation found in the Trinidad case, supra, relative to income is not only absent from the present case, but the facts show that the income as well

Moody v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 699 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 15, 1986

Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management, 776 F.2d 276, 277 (Fed.Cir. 1985); Polos v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 547 , 621 F.2d 385 (1980); Scroggins v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 530 , 397 F.2d 295 . … See Polos v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 547 , 621 F.2d 385 (1980); Fancher v. United States, 218 Ct.Cl. 504 , 588 F.2d 803 (1978); Piccone v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 752 , 407 F.2d 866 (1969).

Rubenstein v. United States

91 Ct. Cl. 180 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1940

The findings of the board of officers were approved by the War Department on August 20, 1934, at which time plaintiff had incurred and paid substantially all the medical expenses here involved. … Defendant relies upon the case of Brunner v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 489 , but that case is not in point.

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United States

505 F.2d 1252 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1974

On exceptions by the carrier, the Commission’s Review Board No. 4 affirmed this report and order. … In McLean Trucking Co. v. United States, 181 Ct.

Bell v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

18 Cl. Ct. 751 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 29, 1989

Waller, a board certified physician in internal medicine and infectious diseases. … Waller is board certified in internal medicine and infectious diseases.

Vickers Petroleum Co. v. United States

64 F. Supp. 469 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1946

the stipulated facts show, plaintiff irrevocably set aside on its books of account the sum of $22,400 in a bond retirement fund reserve in accordance with the written agreement of September 3,1935, and the action of its Board … Helvering v. Ohio Leather Co., 317 U. S. 102, 106, 107 ; Hobbs-Western Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 133 Fed. (2d) 165, 167; Valentine-Clark Corp. v.

Bromley Contracting Co. v. United States

596 F.2d 448 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1979

Ruggiero v. United States, supra; Chernick v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 498 , 372 F.2d 492 (1967). … In Ruggiero v.

Jones v. United States

25 Cl. Ct. 235 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1992

Administrative action by the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to judicial relief and does not toll the running of the statute of limitations. See Hurick v. … Japanese War Notes Claimants v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 630 , 634, 373 F.2d 356, 358 (1967). In Huntzinger v.

Boyce v. United States

543 F.2d 1290 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1976

See, e.g., Hoover v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 640 , 513 F. 2d 603 (1975); Birnholz v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 532 (1972); Cook v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 438 (1964). … In Power v. United States, 209 Ct.

Havemeyer v. United States

59 F. Supp. 537 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1945

In Helvering v. … But the Board did none of these things.

Pascal v. United States

543 F.2d 1284 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1976

See Birnholz v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 532 (1972); Grover v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 337, 353-54 (1973); Hoover v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 640, 648-49 , 513 F. 2d 603, 607-08 (1975); Rifkin v. … He could not even remember whether or not he had a ticket when he boarded the plane In Toronto.”

Lawrence v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 245 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1897

R., 422 , where tbe history of tbe Gregory board is given.) … This had been decided by the highest judicial authority in the case of the Etlah (Chouteau v. The United States, 95 U. S., 61 ).

Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 140 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 29, 1983

For the year ending in 1973, plaintiff appealed to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the “PRRB”). See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo (1976); 42 C.F.R. § 405.1835 . … In Bell v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 189 , 404 F.2d 975 (1968), a board remand was ordered to determine quantum under guidelines set forth by the court. 186 Ct.Cl. at 204-05 , 404 F.2d at 983 .

Chamberlain v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 317 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1928

In Nicholas v. United States, 257 U. … In the language used by the court in Arant v.

Cameron v. United States

30 Ct. Cl. 340 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1895

Justice Brown, speaking for the court, said: “In delivering the opinion of the court, Mr. Justice Miller remarked: ‘We understand the court to have decided (in Clyde v. … Tbe Supreme Court appears not to bave overruled tbe familiar case of Clyde v.