Case law

Amoco Production Co. v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 590 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 7, 1989

At issue is whether a final decision of the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) was arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law or regulation, or unsupported by substantial evidence when the board found that plaintiff, Amoco … Housing Corp. of America v. United States, 199 Ct.Cl. 705, 710 , 468 F.2d 922, 924 (1972); Campbell v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 247, 249 (1983).

Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. United States

108 F. Supp. 603 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

Clark v. United States, 95 U. S. 589, 542 ; Niagara Falls Bridge Commission v. United States, 111 C. Cls. 838 ; Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority v. … V) § 2501. We think this is correct.

Saxon v. United States

125 F. Supp. 953 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1954

The District Engineer appointed a grievance board. … by the board.

Tester Corp. v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 368 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1983

Plaintiff’s petition, filed on April 23, 1980, in the United States Court of Claims, challenged a determination by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) upholding the Contracting Officer’s default termination … Tester Corp. v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 648 (1981).

Smith v. United States

173 Ct. Cl. 462 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1965

But in the case of Murphy v. United States, 165 Ct. … Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591 (1948). Accordingly, on defendant’s motion, plaintiff’s petition is dismissed.

California v. United States

132 F. Supp. 208 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

United States v. Carmack, 329 U.S. 230 , 67 S.Ct. 252 , 91 L.Ed. 209 ; State of Oklahoma ex rel., Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 313 U.S. 508, 534 , 61 S.Ct. 1050 , 85 L.Ed. 1487 ; Wayne County, Ky., v. … United States v. Louisiana, 127 U.S. 182, 192 , 8 S.Ct. 1047 , 32 L.Ed. 66 .

Cravens v. United States

102 F. Supp. 581 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1952

He thereupon returned to Fort Douglas, Utah, his duty station, on sick leave from Letterman General Hospital, in order to await action upon the Retiring Board Proceedings. … In Terry v. United States, 97 F.

White v. United States

22 F. Supp. 821 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1938

In Kohlsaat v. … In Helvering v.

Minneapolis-Moline Co. v. United States

149 F. Supp. 146 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

In Hotpoint Co. v. United States, 127 C. … In Sternbergh et al. v.

Maxwell v. United States

49 Ct. Cl. 262 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1914

Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet., 266 ; Wolsey v. Chapman, 101 U. S., 755, 769 ; Jones v. United States, 137 U. S., 203, 217 ; Truitt v. United States, 38 C. Cls., 398, 403 ; Brodie's case, 128 Fed., 665, 669 . … The early case of United States v.

Kestner v. Department of the Interior

229 Ct. Cl. 772 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1982

On January 16, 1981, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear petitioner’s claim and, further, that his retirement was voluntary. … In our recent decision, Taylor v.

Goetz v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 17 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1928

The corporation presented a claim under the Dent Act to the Board of Contract Adjustment, War Department. The board disallowed it, and the Secretary of War, on appeal, affirmed the disallowance. … Baltimore & Oho Railroad v. United States, 261 U. S. 592 . Authority to act is an essential element of a Dent Act case, and no such authority is proven.

Robb v. United States

456 F.2d 768 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972

Decedent 'appealed his conviction to a Navy Board of Review and repeated the objection to jurisdiction founded on Article 2(10). … On July 29, 1969, the Board of Review rejected all his arguments and affirmed the conviction.

Lyons v. United States

26 Ct. Cl. 31 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1890

L., p. 168), by a board whose duty it was “to fairly and justly value the same;” the amount fixed by this board was accepted by the plaintiff, a deed was executed by him, and he was paid. … R. v. Birkbeck, 70 Ill., 208 ; Peoria, Atlanta and Decatur R. R. Co. v. Saicyer, 71 Ill., 361 .)

Raylaine Worsteds, Inc. v. United States

146 F. Supp. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1956

The Supreme Court in Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … See also Whitfield v. Sears et al., 10 N. W. 2d 564 ; Star Bottling Co. v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co., 144 S.

Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United States

177 Ct. Cl. 184 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 487-88 (1951); Yakima Tribe v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 672 (1962); Snake or Piute Indians v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 241 , 112 F. … National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp., 316 U.S. 105 (1942); Radio Officers' Union v. National Labor Relations Board, 347 U.S. 17, 48-49 (1954); National Labor Relations Boards. Walton Mfg.

Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. United States

656 F.2d 650 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 29, 1981

The contract was for the sale of an estimated 11 million board feet (designated in the contract as 11,000 MBF (thousand board feet)), and permitted the buyer to harvest timber on the Red Rock sale area of the Deer lodge National … Co. v. United States, 193 Ct.

LaChance v. United States

15 Cl. Ct. 127 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 29, 1988

Defendant’s agents then placed the money in a brown paper bag which had been in the trunk of the car, issued plaintiff a receipt, and removed the money to Kennedy Airport for testing. … Corp. v.

Folsom v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 759 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1982

Such claims arose when he was separated from active service in 1963 (e.g., Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. … E.g., Bruno v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 383 , 556 F.2d 1104 (1977).

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United States

505 F.2d 1252 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1974

On exceptions by the carrier, the Commission’s Review Board No. 4 affirmed this report and order. … In McLean Trucking Co. v. United States, 181 Ct.