Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

2.51s

  • Latvian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line v. United States

    88 F. Supp. 290 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1950

    S. 513, 519 ; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 593 ; Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557, 569 ; Lynch v. United States, 292 U. S. 571, 581-582 . In United States v. … value of the property and consequent compensation to be made, is merely an inauisition to establish a particular fact as *813 a preliminary to the actual taking; and it may be prosecuted before commissioners or special boards

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lyons v. United States

    26 Ct. Cl. 31 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1890

    L., p. 168), by a board whose duty it was “to fairly and justly value the same;” the amount fixed by this board was accepted by the plaintiff, a deed was executed by him, and he was paid. … R. v. Birkbeck, 70 Ill., 208 ; Peoria, Atlanta and Decatur R. R. Co. v. Saicyer, 71 Ill., 361 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vinegar Hill Zinc Company, a Corporation v. United States

    276 F.2d 13 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

    David V. Anthony, Washington, D. C., with whom was George Cochran Doub, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant, Earl L. Huntington, Washington, D. C., was on the brief. … The General Services Administration Board of Review, and the Administrator himself, were of this opinion.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Central Trust Co. v. United States

    305 F.2d 393 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

    On August 3, 1954, the board of directors of the Company was composed of the following ten members: Albert E. Heekin, James J. Heekin (chairman of the board), Daniel M. Heekin, Robert E. Heekin and Walter V. … On October 25, 1954, the membership of the board remained the same, except for Walter V. Heekin, who died in August-1954. 21.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Abson v. United States

    73 Ct. Cl. 442 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1931

    The plaintiff cites the decision in Freeland v. United States, 64 C. … Cls. 364 , in which it was shown that the plaintiff’s dependent, his mother, although living with relatives, was required to pay for her room and board $9 per week, and that her salary was inadequate to meet even this expense

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • H. Landau & Co. v. United States

    35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,599 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1988

    The case was before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit after a decision by the General Services Board of Contract Appeals (“GSBCA”). … It therefore vacated the Board’s determination as to return of the first payment, yet precluded Treasury from making further payment. This brief recitation makes clear why Amdahl is inapplicable here.

    Vacated on other grounds by H. Landau & Company v. The United States, 886 F.2d 322 (1989)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. United States

    49 Ct. Cl. 262 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1914

    Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet., 266 ; Wolsey v. Chapman, 101 U. S., 755, 769 ; Jones v. United States, 137 U. S., 203, 217 ; Truitt v. United States, 38 C. Cls., 398, 403 ; Brodie's case, 128 Fed., 665, 669 . … The early case of United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sarah E. Walker v. The United States

    428 F.2d 1229 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

    Foremost Properties v. Gladman, 100 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1958); Lefkowitz v. McQuagge, 122 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1960); Lefkowitz v. McQuagge, 230 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Fla. 1963), aff'd 334 F.2d 243 (C.A. 5, 1964). … On October 6,1949, Ocean Boulevard was officially abandoned by order of the Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • O'Donnell v. United States

    166 Ct. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1964

    Georgia Kaolin Co. v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 39 ; see Estate of Fairbanks v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 1, 8 . … Since the hearings in this case were held prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in Glidden Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Standard Shipbuilding Corp. v. United States

    135 F. Supp. 892 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1955

    It authorized compensation for the cost of increased wages and related expenses resulting from retroactive mandatory orders of the War Labor Board. … Standard-Vacuum Oil Oo. v. United States, 339 U. S. 157 ; Werfel et al v. United States et al, 83 F. Supp. 507 ; Lilly v. United States Lines Co., 42 F. Supp. 214 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arkwright Club of the City of New York, Inc. v. United States

    127 Ct. Cl. 247 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1954

    That claim was rejected by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on April 6,1945, but following the decision of this Court in The Merchants Club v. United States, 106 C. … They *253 provide for the election of a Board of Governors by the membership and for the election by that Board of a president, vice president, secretary and treasurer.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Grover v. United States

    200 Ct. Cl. 337 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1973

    The Board found that charges Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 were sustained by the evidence, throwing out charge No. 3 (false claim for reimbursement of expenditures) involving only a minor claim for bus fare. … Travis v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 67 (1972); Holman v. United States, supra; Morelli v. United States, supra; Greenway v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 350, 362 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 881 (1966).

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • Wally v. United States

    148 Ct. Cl. 371 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

    Boardman v. Reed, 6 Pet. (U.S.) 328; Hail v. Haynes, 312 Ky. 357 , 227 S.W. 2d 918 . … Brown.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jankowitz v. United States

    533 F.2d 538 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1976

    The Civil Service Commission’s Board of Appeals and Review affirmed on November 13,1972. … Brown v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 768, 785 , 524 F. 2d 693, 703 (1975).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Featheringill v. United States

    217 Ct. Cl. 24 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1978

    Healthy Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968). … Walton v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 755 (1977); Muehlen v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 690 (1976). See Eastport S.S. Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599 , 372 F.2d 1002 (1967).

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. United States

    229 Ct. Cl. 510 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1981

    E.g., Baker v. United States, 222 Ct. Cl. 263, 271 , 641 F. 2d 263, 268 (1980), and cases cited thereat; Bielec v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 550, 560 , 456 F. 2d 690, 696 (1972); Ganse v. United States, 180 Ct. … E.g., Salla v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 744, 746-47 (1981); Goutos v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 95, 98 , 552 F. 2d 922, 924 (1976); Peters v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 373, 376-380 , 534 F. 2d 232, 234-236 (1975).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lukens v. United States

    62 Ct. Cl. 598 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1926

    He, together with the other owners of the club, elected a board of directors, which proceeded to enact by-laws for the government of the club. … Iselin v. United-States, 270 U. S. 245 . A judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum claimed .with interest. Moss, Judge; Gbaham, Judge; Booth, Judge; and Campbell, Chief Justice\ concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. United States

    108 F. Supp. 603 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

    Clark v. United States, 95 U. S. 589, 542 ; Niagara Falls Bridge Commission v. United States, 111 C. Cls. 838 ; Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority v. … V) § 2501. We think this is correct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Royce Ainsworth v. The United States

    399 F.2d 176 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1968

    In Social Security Board v. … “Back pay” is not a fine or penalty imposed upon the *186 employer by the Board. * * * A worker is not given “back pay” by the Board equal to what he would have earned with the employer but for the unlawful discharge, but

    Superseded — as noted by a later courtCited 25 timesPublished
  • Barba v. United States

    2 Cl. Ct. 674 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1983

    However, as Commissioner v. … Plaintiff cites two early Board of Tax Appeals decisions in support of this thesis: McKenna v. Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 326 (1925) and Frey v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.