Case law

Reliance Insurance v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,090 · United States Court of Claims · May 8, 1991

Certification of contractor claims over $50,000 is a jurisdictional prerequisite to an action brought by a contractor in this court or before an agency board of contract appeals. United States v. … Co. v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 732 (1990); Donald M. Drake Co. v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 518 (1987).

Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. United States

68 Ct. Cl. 273 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1929

The claim here sued upon was presented to the Secretary of War, who referred it to the Board of Contract Adjustment, which rejected it, and on appeal to the Secretary of War the decision of the board was affirmed. … Jacob Reed's Sons v. United States, 273 U. S. 200, 202 ; Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 592, 596 . The findings show no express contract and no facts from which a contract could be implied.

Slover v. United States

33 F. Supp. 446 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1940

The plaintiff was the chairman of the board of the Norfolk Ledger-Dispatch, an evening newspaper. He was also *291 a stockholder in the Norfolk National Bank of Commerce and Trusts. … Goldsborough v. Burnet, 46 F. (2d) 432. The plaintiff is not entitled to recover and his petition will therefore be dismissed. It is so ordered. LittletoN, Judge; GeeeN, Judge; and Whaley, Chief Justice, concur.

Marine

618 F.2d 120 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1979

Co. v. United States, 165 Ct. … Kirby v. United States, supra, 201 Ct. Cl. at 535 .

Booth & Co. v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 288 · United States Court of Claims · May 24, 1926

S. 1 . *294 When the claim was again asserted in a subsequent suit, Portsmouth Co. v. United States, 260 U. S. 327 , Mr. … Justice Brown’s opinion in the Dooley case, 182 U.

Rentenbach Engineering Co. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,452 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1988

See Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v. United States, 10 Cl.Ct. 236, 252 (1986). … or consolidating other claims with the old, plaintiff must act apart from this Order to protect its interests vis-a-vis the statutory time frames permitting appeal of that decision to the General Services Administration Board

McDougall v. United States

149 F. Supp. 651 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1957

Martilla v. United States, 118 Ct.Cl. 177 ; Heffernan v. United States, 137 F.Supp. 437 , 133 Ct. Cl. 839 ; Adler v. United States, 146 F. Supp. 956 , 134 Ct.Cl. 200 . … Adler v. United States, supra.

Garcia v. United States

617 F.2d 218 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1980

Co. v. United States, 165 Ct. … See Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300 (1973). "§ 1406.

Cook v. United States

9 Ct. Cl. 288 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1873

Pearsol, 1 *290 Pet., p. 338; Shriver v. … (Thompson v. Tolmie, 2 Pet., p. 157; Voorhees v. Bank United States, 10 ibid., p. 449.)

AT & T Technologies, Inc. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,731 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1989

As this court recently stated in Vulcan Engineering Co. v. … The Court of Claims in General Dynamics Corporation v.

Spokane Tribe of Indians v. United States

163 Ct. Cl. 58 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1963

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 487-488 (1951); Osage Nation of Indians v. United States, 119 Ct. Cl. 592, 606, 608-611, 612-613, 615, 672 , 97 F. … Federal Trade Commission, 327 U.S. 608, 613-614 (1946); Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 364, 372-374 (1939); Crolley v. Tatton, 249 F. 2d 908, 911-912 (C.A. 5, 1957); Public Utility Dist.

Weed & Bro. v. United States

38 F.2d 935 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1930

Barstow & Co., Inp., v. Bowers (D. C.) 15 F.(2d) 75 ; Becker v. United States (C. C. A.) 21 F.(2d) 1003 ; Robert P. Hyams Coal Co. v. United States (D. C.) 26 F.(2d) 805 . … United States v. Rindskopf, 105 U. S. 418 , 26 L. Ed. 1131; Rieck v. Heiner (C. C. A.) 25 F.(2d) 453 .

Beuttas v. United States

77 F. Supp. 933 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1948

Reg. 7871 ), and Rules and Regulations of the National War Labor-Board; and Executive Order 9301 ( 8 Fed. … .); Gothwaite v. United States, 102 C. Cls. 400 ; Jones v. United States, 1 C. Cls. 383 , and Deming v. United States, 1 C. Cls. 190 .

Russ Mitchell, Inc. v. United States

102 F. Supp. 544 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1952

On January 31, 1950, the Corps of Engineers Claims and Appeals Board, acting on behalf of the Chief of Engineers, disallowed the plaintiffs’ appeal. … Inc., v. United States, 90 C. Cls. 466 . The actual amount of concrete placed by the plaintiffs under Item 26 of the contract was 2,873 cubic yards.

Raylaine Worsteds, Inc. v. United States

146 F. Supp. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1956

The Supreme Court in Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … See also Whitfield v. Sears et al., 10 N. W. 2d 564 ; Star Bottling Co. v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co., 144 S.

Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc. v. United States

292 F.2d 913 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 280 U.S. *916 320, 50 S.Ct. 118, 120 , 74 L.Ed. 451 .” [Emphasis supplied.] See also Skibsaktieselskapet Siljestad v. … Miner v.

Wright v. United States

19 Cl. Ct. 779 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1990

Christoffersen v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 998, 1002 (1982); Gnagy v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 242, 250 , 634 F.2d 574, 579 (1980). … United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 397-98 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 952-53 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 3 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); see Lee v.

Taylor v. Agency for International Development

231 Ct. Cl. 1006 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 17, 1982

United States v. Testan, 424 U. S. 392 (1976); United States v. King, 396 U. S. 1 (1969). … Dunn v. United States Department of Agriculture, 228 Ct. Cl. 129, 131 , 654 F. 2d 64, 66 (1981). See also Hadley v. Department of the Navy, 229 Ct.Cl. 591 (1981).

Grayson v. United States

149 F. Supp. 183 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

See Perkins v. United States, 116 C. Cls. 778 . I would dismiss the petition. … Plaintiff has sought relief by application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, but after preliminary review said Board declined to further review this matter or issue a formal decision upon merits of said

George F. Driscoll Co. v. United States

63 F. Supp. 657 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 1, 1945

Fernandez and Hnos., S. en C., v. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., 119 F. (2d) 809, 1 Cir.; 136 A. L. R. 351, with annotation on the construction of arbitration contracts; Williston on Contracts, § 1929. … Where, as in Government contracts, the nonjudicial decision is to be made, not by a board of neutral persons, but by an agent of one of the contracting parties, the rule of construction should be at least as strict as in