Case law

Highland Park Inc. v. United States

161 F. Supp. 597 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1958

As the Supreme Court said in Causby v. … Portsmouth Co. v. United States, 260 U. S. 327 ; Gerlach Live Stock Co. v. United States, 111 C. Cls. 1, 86 ; aff. 339 U. S. 725 .

Cook v. United States

164 Ct. Cl. 438 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1964

Lawyer v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 501 , cert. denied 362 U.S. 977 (1960); Guiness v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 1, 6 , cert. denied 363 U.S. 819 (1960). … Bryant v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 460 , cert. denied 344 U.S. 913 (1953); Finn v. United States, 152 a. Cl. 1 (1961).

Trotter v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 568 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 8, 1926

Whiting, administratrix, v. United, States, 35 C. … S. 90 ; and United States v. James Reed, 265 U. S. 570 .

First Commercial Bank v. Secretary of the Deptartment of Health & Human Services

19 Cl. Ct. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1989

See Pusateri v. Secretary of the Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 18 Cl.Ct. 828, 832-33 (1989); Brown v. Secretary of the Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 18 Cl.Ct. 834, 844-45 (1989). … But see Brown v. Secretary of the Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 18 Cl.Ct. 834 (1989) ($30,000 cap applies only to portion of attorney’s fees incurred in proving lost wages and pain and suffering).

United States v. Kiowa, Comanche & Apache Tribes of Indians

166 F. Supp. 939 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1958

Defendant points to the fact, that in our decision in Quapaw Tribe v. … United States, 120 F.Supp. 283 , 128 Ct.Cl. 45 , the court held that the payment of board and funeral expenses of indigent Indians was a proper offset.

Bordo Products Co. v. United States

476 F.2d 1312 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1973

Bordo representatives were elected to Pitt’s board with a view to facilitating Pitt’s sale or liquidation. … Commissioner, 340 F. 2d 445 (2d Cir. 1965); Wilbur Security Co. v. Commissioner, 279 F. 2d 657 (9th Cir. 1960); cf. Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. Commissioner, 339 U.S. 583 (1950).

Betts v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1926

See Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co., 36 Fed. 722, 724 . … Menendez v. Holt, 128 U. S. 514, 522 ; Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 540 .

Marks v. United States

58 F. Supp. 182 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1944

In that month it was struck from the board of the New York Stock Exchange. … The first one was Marsh v. Commissioner, 38 B. T. A. 878. In this case the Board of Tax Appeals held that the stock became worthless in 1932. In Young v.

C. J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc. v. United States

341 F.2d 600 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1965

The Federal Maritime Board Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 C.F.R. § 201.264 (1953), contain a similar time-extension clause. … Edwards Eng’r Corp. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 322, 332-34 (1963); Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States, 109 Ct.

Campbell Farming Corp. v. United States

132 F. Supp. 216 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

Stahmann v. Vidal, 305 U. S. 61, 64 . … In Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U.

Globe Gazette Printing Co. v. United States

13 F. Supp. 422 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1936

of Tax Appeals. ■ Globe-Gazette' Printing Co. v. … In the case of Lewis v.

O'Donnell v. United States

166 Ct. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1964

Georgia Kaolin Co. v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 39 ; see Estate of Fairbanks v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 1, 8 . … Since the hearings in this case were held prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in Glidden Co. v.

Idaho Falls Bonded Produce & Supply Co. v. United States

107 F. Supp. 952 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 4, 1952

The plaintiff .appealed to the War Department Board of Contract Appeals, which was the Secretary’s authorized agent for that purpose. … We think *957 that the Government’s position before the Board of Contract Appeals was well taken. See Martin Wunderlich v.

Curtis v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 186 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1928

Plaintiff presented to the proper Navy board a claim for compensation for the property taken, and was awarded $19,635 for the Sandy Point Tract and $3,200 for plaintiff’s interest in the Seaborn Tract and the 2.17 acres taken … Under the rule announced in the case of Pope v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 974 , plaintiff can not recover interest for *190 the period between the date of the award and November 5, 1925. See Finding VI.

Jonas v. United States

50 Ct. Cl. 281 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1915

In Elliott v. Harris, 24 App. D. … In United States v. Dunn, 120 U.

Vinegar Hill Zinc Company, a Corporation v. United States

276 F.2d 13 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

David V. Anthony, Washington, D. C., with whom was George Cochran Doub, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant, Earl L. Huntington, Washington, D. C., was on the brief. … The General Services Administration Board of Review, and the Administrator himself, were of this opinion.

Fricano v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 796 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1991

Kredich is not board-certified in rheumatology, nevertheless the Special Master found her to be well-qualified as an expert in the field of rheumatology. … See Schisler, supra, 787 F.2d at 81, 85 ; Havas v. Bowen, 804 F.2d 783, 786 (2d Cir.1986); Bluvband v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 886, 893 (2d Cir.1984); Martin v.

The Cunard Steam-Ship Co. v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 428 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1890

The act of March 3,1883, provided, in Schedule U. thereof, that a drawback of 75 cents per ton should be allowed upon “all bituminous coal imported into the United States, which is afterwards used for fuel on board vessels … A similar question was presented to this court in Kennedy v. The United States ( 23 C. Cls. R., 361 ), and the court held •that 1'ongress intended the act of 1886 to “ apjily only to reshipments thereaiter made.”

Missabe Realty Company v. The United States

382 F.2d 303 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

OPINION LARAMORE, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This is the companion case to Cuyuna Realty Company v. United States, ct. cl., 382 F.2d 298 decided this day. … On November 29, 1956, a plan for recapitalizing Missabe was authorized by NWI’s board of directors. That plan provided, inter alia, that the demand notes of Missabe held by NWI would be surrendered for cancellation.

DiNatale v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 72 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1987

United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 712, 713 , 618 F.2d 122 (1979); Saunooke v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 327, 330 (1985); Frise v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 488, 490 (1984). … Congress saw the need to provide a forum for those taxpayers not financially able to "pay first and litigate later,” and created the Board of Tax Appeals (now the Tax Court) in 1924.