Case law

Braude v. United States

585 F.2d 1049 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1978

Art Center School v. United States, 136 Ct.Cl.218, 227, 142 F. Supp. 916, 921 (1956); Thomas v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 76,80 (1953); Dion v. United States, 137 Ct. Cl. 166 (1956); Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. … In Japanese War Notes Claimants Ass’n. v.

Grayson v. United States

141 Ct. Cl. 866 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1958

in support of the petition, plaintiff further recited that from July 17,1980, until July 17,1957, he was a registered pharmacist of good professional standing in the State of Ohio; that on the latter date the Ohio State Board … In the case of Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.

Columbian Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. United States

9 F. Supp. 688 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 4, 1935

In Simmons Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. … Plaintiff cites-the cases of Hershey Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 14 B. T. A. 867; Id. (C. C. A.) 43 F.(2d) 298 , and Malta Temple Association v. Commissioner, 16 B. T.

Pool v. United States

121 F. Supp. 917 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1954

The State court decision in question was rendered in the case of Sneed v. Pool, et al., 228 S. W. 2d 913 . … In Estate of Sneed v. Commissioner, 17 T.

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United States

338 F.2d 668 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1964

The Supreme Court in Lewis v. … Routzahn v. Brown, 95 F.2d 766, 769 (6th Cir. 1938).

Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners v. United States

81 Ct. Cl. 503 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1935

See Johnson v. Chicago & Pacific Elevator Co., 119 U. S. 388 ; Martin v. West, 222 U. S. 191 ; The Poughkeepsie, 162 Fed. 494 . … Co. v. Compagnie Générale Transat lantique, 182 U. S. 406 .

Rentenbach Engineering Co. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,452 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1988

See Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v. United States, 10 Cl.Ct. 236, 252 (1986). … or consolidating other claims with the old, plaintiff must act apart from this Order to protect its interests vis-a-vis the statutory time frames permitting appeal of that decision to the General Services Administration Board

Mann v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 580 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1897

Clark, 7 Pick., 133 ; Gilmore v. Wilbur, 12 Pick., 120 ; Miller v. Miller, 7 Pick., 133 ; Merrick, J., in Brown v. Holbrook, 4 Gray, 102 , 103; Morrison v. Rogers, 2 Scam., 317; Gray v. … Griffith, 10 Watts, 431 ; O'Conley v. Natchez, 1 Sm. & M., 31; Berly v. Taylor, 5 Hill, 577 ; Stocket v. Watkins, 2 Gill & J., 326; Cromwell v. Lovett, 1 Hall, 56 ; Cummings v. Noyes, 10 Mass.

Fish v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 188 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 29, 1983

The dividends were returned pursuant to a board of directors resolution demanding said return on the basis that the original declaration had been “improper and unintentionally paid.” … LeCompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc., 528 F.2d 601, 604 (5th Cir. 1976). The mere fact that the plaintiff may obtain some tactical advantage is no bar to the granting of a dismissal without prejudice. Durham v.

Vereline v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 109 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 13, 1984

United States v. … Robinson v. Rand, 340 F.Supp. 37 (D.Colo.1972), was on the books long before Cook v.

Winters

650 F.2d 287 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 25, 1980

See Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 829, 832, 835 (1976). This court has no jurisdiction to hear racial discrimination claims. Clark v. United States, 212 Ct. … Co. v.

Doherty v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 1027 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1982

We do not perceive any need for a remand to the board for consideration of this evidence because it adds nothing material to the facts exhaustively and fairly found by Judge Pollack. … Pryor v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 578 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 (1977).

Thomas E. Spicknall, Inc.

23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,092 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1973

Count One seeks review under Wunderlich Act criteria of a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals upholding the Government’s default termination of the contracts, and Count Two alleges that the Government … On October 3,1972 Commissioner George Willi filed an opinion sustaining the Board’s conclusion that the contracting officer did not waive the completion dates. The commissioner distinguished this case from DeVito v.

James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United States

423 F.2d 1231 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

Plaintiff did not submit any of its claims to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. … On July 6, 1960, the Board (by its “Recorder”) advised that, in accordance with plaintiff’s letter, its appeal had been withdrawn from the Board’s docket.

Cem Securities Corp. v. United States

55 F. Supp. 109 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1944

The Board of Tax Appeals (now The Tax Court) has held that both gifts to customers and the expenses of enter- *104 taming them are deductible. James F. Coleman, 3 B. T. A. 835; Adler Co. v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. … Both the Commissioner’s regulations and the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals recognize the right of the taxpayer to deduct bonuses to employees. Boericke & Runyon, 3 B. T. A. 684; Ferry Market, Inc. v.

Carroll v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 400 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1928

See Brown's case, 1 C. Cls. 307 ; *410 Kerchner case, 7 C. Cls. 579 ; Finney case, 32 C. Cls. 546 ; Electric Fireproofing Co. case, 89 C. Cls. 307 . In another case, United & Globe Rubber Mfg. Co. v. … Florence Mining Company v. Brown, 124 U. S. 385, 390 . See also Smith v. York Co., 58 N. J. L. 242, and Dougherty v. Neville, 186 N. Y. 578 . The petition should be dismissed. And it is so ordered.

Mitchelle v. United States

451 F.2d 1395 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 10, 1971

Pridemark, Inc. v. Commissioner, 345 F. 2d 35 , 41 (4th Cir. 1965). … When it was learned on or about February 17, 1961, that Namco could not qualify to do business in Australia because of its name, the 'board of directors of the corporation discussed the problem of what should be done.

Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. United States

678 F.2d 1071 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1982

Co. v. United States, supra. … Timber Investors, Inc. v. United States, supra; Womack v. United States, 182 Ct. Cl. 399, 414 , 389 F.2d 793, 802 (1968); 20 Russell & Pugh Lumber Co. v. United States, supra; cf. Maurice Mandel, Inc. v.

Patton v. United States

75 F. Supp. 470 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1948

In Bonner v. … Co. v.

Ross v. United States

173 F. Supp. 793 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1959

Idaho Power Company v. United States, Ct.Cl. 1958, 161 F.Supp. 807 , certiorari denied 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 53 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Northup v. United States, 2 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 304 ; Smith v. … Smith v. United States, supra; Northup v. United States, supra.