Case law

Vereline v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 109 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 13, 1984

United States v. … Robinson v. Rand, 340 F.Supp. 37 (D.Colo.1972), was on the books long before Cook v.

Powell v. United States

100 Ct. Cl. 298 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1943

He was paid the allowances of an officer without dependents for all of the period of his service, except the period during which he was assigned to duty on board the U. S. S. Monocacy. … Mumma v. United States, 99 C. Cls. 261.

Vinegar Hill Zinc Co. v. United States

149 Ct. Cl. 494 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

ARTICLE V. … The appeal was heard by a Board of Review. The Board determined that all of the causes *513 of delay were beyond the control of the plaintiff.

Middlebrook v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 294 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1929

The defendant offered in evidence the report of the inspection and survey made by the Joint Merchant Vessel Board of the Army and Navy. No member of this board was called as a witness for defendant. … In Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States, 256 U.

Ross v. United States

173 F. Supp. 793 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1959

Idaho Power Company v. United States, Ct.Cl. 1958, 161 F.Supp. 807 , certiorari denied 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 53 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 ; Northup v. United States, 2 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 304 ; Smith v. … Smith v. United States, supra; Northup v. United States, supra.

Johnston v. United States

41 Ct. Cl. 76 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1906

the ships, although he boarded each one as it came in for that purpose. … S., 214; Bulkley v. United States, 7 C. Cls. R., 543 .)

Sloan Danenhower & Co. v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 561 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 10, 1928

On the same day an officer of said barge came alongside and boarded her and talked with Sloan Danenhower, president of plaintiff corporation, about salvaging the barge. … Danenhower then took up quarters on board the wreck and transferred provisions, diving apparatus, and gear to her.

C. J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc. v. United States

341 F.2d 600 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1965

The Federal Maritime Board Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 C.F.R. § 201.264 (1953), contain a similar time-extension clause. … Edwards Eng’r Corp. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 322, 332-34 (1963); Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States, 109 Ct.

Johnson v. United States

11 Cl. Ct. 17 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1986

Johnson was on the board of directors of St. Jo Parent during 1979, had been on the board when the decision to form Capital was made, and was aware of the general nature of Equity’s business. … See Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 579 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1171 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965) (Harlan, J., concurring).

Harmon v. United States

23 Ct. Cl. 132 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 13, 1888

In support of this theory of the law, our attention is called to the cases of Leopold v. United States, 18 C. Cls. R., 546 ; Redgrave v. Same, 116 U. S. R., 474 ; Perkins v. Same , id., 483 . … (Deming v. United States, 1 C. Cls. R., 190 .)

Jones v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 531 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1984

of this court’s earlier order denying defendant’s and plaintiff’s cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 In reaching its earlier decision, the court considered the issues of whether an Air Force Reserve Officer Screening Board … Indeed, with regard to selection boards, the court in Foster has noted that there is no such duty. 3 Cl.Ct. at 444, citing Gilmore v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 829, 832 (1981) .

White v. United States

72 Ct. Cl. 459 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931

On December 22, 1903, Assistant Comptroller Mitchell, in response to a reference of the Secretary of the' Navy, was confronted with the following facts: A carpenter’s mate while on board the Franklin at Norfolk, Virginia, … See Conrad v. United States, 32 C. Cls. 139 ; Dodge v. United States, 33 C. Cls. 28 ; Walsh v. United States, 43 C. Cls. 225 ; Carrington v. United States, 46 C. Cls. 279 .

A & S Council Oil Co. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,656 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1989

The Board, therefore, dismissed the appeal because it was not filed within 90 days, as required. … United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 , 89 S.Ct. 1501 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). We are, therefore, without jurisdiction to hear this case under the CDA. Thoen v. United States, 765 F.2d at 1116 , and Joseph Morton Co. v.

North American Aviation, Inc. v. United States

67 F. Supp. 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1946

At that meeting the board of directors was elected, bylaws were adopted, and the board was authorized to issue shares of capital stock. … Flint v. Stone Tracy Company, 220 U. S. 107 .

Centex Construction Co. v. United States

162 Ct. Cl. 211 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1963

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 490 ; National Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 308 . … The Board denied plaintiff’s appeal in a decision of August 19, 1960, on the ground that the Board had no authority to review a decision of an FHA official.

Irvine v. United States

18 Ct. Cl. 615 · United States Court of Claims · May 21, 1883

On the 20th of February, 1863, the cotton was taken by naval officers, put on board of a gunboat, and finally delivered, with other cotton taken in like manner, to the marshal of the United States at Cairo, Ill., where it … In the case of United States v. Ross ( 92 U. S. R., 281 ), the Supreme Court points out what must be established by claimants under that act in order to entitle them to recover. Mr.

Brewster v. United States

9 F. Supp. 686 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 4, 1935

Lucas v. Earl, 281 U. S. 111 , 50 S. Ct. 241 , 74 L. Ed. 731 ; Burnet v. Leininger, 285 U. S. 136 , 52 S. Ct. 345 , 76 L. Ed. 665 ; Mitchel v. Bowers (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 287 ; Bing v. Bowers (D. … Sixth Circuit, 74 F.(2d) 78 , decided December 14, 1934; McDonald v. Commissioner, 28 B. T. A. 1234; Kearney v. Commissioner, decided by the. U. S. Board of Tax Appeals December 26, 1934, and Porter v.

Cem Securities Corp. v. United States

55 F. Supp. 109 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1944

The Board of Tax Appeals (now The Tax Court) has held that both gifts to customers and the expenses of enter- *104 taming them are deductible. James F. Coleman, 3 B. T. A. 835; Adler Co. v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. … Both the Commissioner’s regulations and the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals recognize the right of the taxpayer to deduct bonuses to employees. Boericke & Runyon, 3 B. T. A. 684; Ferry Market, Inc. v.

Burke v. United States

13 Ct. Cl. 231 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1877

Welch, v. Mandeville ( 5 Wheat., 277 ); Tiernan v. Jackson ( 5 Peters, 579 ); United States v. Buford, (3 id., 12). … (Carter v. Jarvis, 9 Johns., 143 ; Austin v. Sawyer, 9 Cow., 39 .)

Irwin S. Chanin v. The United States. Henry I. Chanin v. The United States. Sylvia Chanin v. The United States

393 F.2d 972 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1968

After the second quotation from Heringer v. … Defendant relies on Drybrough v.