Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

2.21s

  • Toulon v. United States.

    51 Ct. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1916

    He was reexamined for promotion on June 17, 1912; completed the examination on June 25, and passed; and the board’s findings were approved by the President July 3, 1912. … Justice Miller, in Kaufman v. Lee, 106 U. S., 196, 220 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Armand Edward Blackmar v. The United States

    354 F.2d 340 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

    McDougall v. United States, 149 F.Supp. 651 , 138 Ct.Cl. 90, 93 (1957); Hutton v. United States, 154 Ct.Cl. 34, 39 (1961). … Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367, 372 , 39 S.Ct. 293 , 63 L.Ed. 650 (1919); Bailey v. United States, 171 F.Supp. 281 , 144 Ct.Cl. 720, 722 (1959)).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Huerta v. United States

    548 F.2d 343 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1977

    Plaintiff thereafter prosecuted an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. The board denied the appeal on April 6,1971, on the ground that relief was not available to plaintiff under the contract terms. … United States v. North Am. Transp. & Trading Co., 253 U.S. 330, 334 (1920); S chillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163, 168 (1894); A nggelis v. United States, 202 Ct.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Berner v. United States

    151 Ct. Cl. 128 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1960

    Helvering v. Limestone Co., 315 U.S. 179 (1942). … Penfield v. Davis, 105 F. Supp. at 311.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hong-Yee Chiu v. United States

    6 Cl. Ct. 18 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 2, 1984

    See Nibali v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 8 , 634 F.2d 494 (1980). See also, Nibali v. United States, 218 Ct.Cl. 547 , 589 F.2d 514 (1978); Duvall v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 711 (1983) (NET-TESHEIM, J.). … before they are presented to a court, where the party has prevailed before the board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Maliner v. United States

    362 F.2d 281 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966

    Tibbals v. … In Braunstein v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Patrick Warren Construction Co. v. United States

    129 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1954

    The Supreme Court in Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … This court said in Owens v. United States, 123 C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Powell v. United States

    100 Ct. Cl. 298 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1943

    He was paid the allowances of an officer without dependents for all of the period of his service, except the period during which he was assigned to duty on board the U. S. S. Monocacy. … Mumma v. United States, 99 C. Cls. 261.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vinegar Hill Zinc Co. v. United States

    149 Ct. Cl. 494 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

    ARTICLE V. … The appeal was heard by a Board of Review. The Board determined that all of the causes *513 of delay were beyond the control of the plaintiff.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • William A. Steimer v. The United States

    309 F.2d 412 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1962

    STEIMER v. The UNITED STATES. No. 111-61. United States Court of Claims. November 7, 1962. Fred W. Shields, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Katherine H. Johnson, Alexandria, Va., with whom was Joseph D. … Corps to the Board, advising that acceptance of plaintiff's resignation "resulted in a complete separation from the service" effective August 11, 1943. 22 It was the opinion of the Board that: 1) plaintiff could not hold

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Middlebrook v. United States

    67 Ct. Cl. 294 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1929

    The defendant offered in evidence the report of the inspection and survey made by the Joint Merchant Vessel Board of the Army and Navy. No member of this board was called as a witness for defendant. … In Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States, 256 U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. United States

    41 Ct. Cl. 76 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1906

    the ships, although he boarded each one as it came in for that purpose. … S., 214; Bulkley v. United States, 7 C. Cls. R., 543 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harmon v. United States

    23 Ct. Cl. 132 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 13, 1888

    In support of this theory of the law, our attention is called to the cases of Leopold v. United States, 18 C. Cls. R., 546 ; Redgrave v. Same, 116 U. S. R., 474 ; Perkins v. Same , id., 483 . … (Deming v. United States, 1 C. Cls. R., 190 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. United States

    11 Cl. Ct. 17 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1986

    Johnson was on the board of directors of St. Jo Parent during 1979, had been on the board when the decision to form Capital was made, and was aware of the general nature of Equity’s business. … See Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 579 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1171 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965) (Harlan, J., concurring).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • White v. United States

    72 Ct. Cl. 459 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931

    On December 22, 1903, Assistant Comptroller Mitchell, in response to a reference of the Secretary of the' Navy, was confronted with the following facts: A carpenter’s mate while on board the Franklin at Norfolk, Virginia, … See Conrad v. United States, 32 C. Cls. 139 ; Dodge v. United States, 33 C. Cls. 28 ; Walsh v. United States, 43 C. Cls. 225 ; Carrington v. United States, 46 C. Cls. 279 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jones v. United States

    6 Cl. Ct. 531 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1984

    of this court’s earlier order denying defendant’s and plaintiff’s cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 In reaching its earlier decision, the court considered the issues of whether an Air Force Reserve Officer Screening Board … Indeed, with regard to selection boards, the court in Foster has noted that there is no such duty. 3 Cl.Ct. at 444, citing Gilmore v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 829, 832 (1981) .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • A & S Council Oil Co. v. United States

    35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,656 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1989

    The Board, therefore, dismissed the appeal because it was not filed within 90 days, as required. … United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 , 89 S.Ct. 1501 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). We are, therefore, without jurisdiction to hear this case under the CDA. Thoen v. United States, 765 F.2d at 1116 , and Joseph Morton Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • North American Aviation, Inc. v. United States

    67 F. Supp. 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1946

    At that meeting the board of directors was elected, bylaws were adopted, and the board was authorized to issue shares of capital stock. … Flint v. Stone Tracy Company, 220 U. S. 107 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Centex Construction Co. v. United States

    162 Ct. Cl. 211 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1963

    Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 490 ; National Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 308 . … The Board denied plaintiff’s appeal in a decision of August 19, 1960, on the ground that the Board had no authority to review a decision of an FHA official.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Liles

    618 F.2d 119 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1979

    Plaintiff appealed, and his firing was affirmed by the Civil Service Commission Appeals Review Board. Plaintiff initiated an action in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. … See Stilley v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 982 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 999 (1968); Edgar v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 9 , 171 F. Supp. 243 (1959).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.