Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
2.21s
51 Ct. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1916
He was reexamined for promotion on June 17, 1912; completed the examination on June 25, and passed; and the board’s findings were approved by the President July 3, 1912. … Justice Miller, in Kaufman v. Lee, 106 U. S., 196, 220 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedArmand Edward Blackmar v. The United States
354 F.2d 340 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965
McDougall v. United States, 149 F.Supp. 651 , 138 Ct.Cl. 90, 93 (1957); Hutton v. United States, 154 Ct.Cl. 34, 39 (1961). … Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367, 372 , 39 S.Ct. 293 , 63 L.Ed. 650 (1919); Bailey v. United States, 171 F.Supp. 281 , 144 Ct.Cl. 720, 722 (1959)).
Cited 18 timesPublished548 F.2d 343 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1977
Plaintiff thereafter prosecuted an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. The board denied the appeal on April 6,1971, on the ground that relief was not available to plaintiff under the contract terms. … United States v. North Am. Transp. & Trading Co., 253 U.S. 330, 334 (1920); S chillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163, 168 (1894); A nggelis v. United States, 202 Ct.
Cited 7 timesPublished151 Ct. Cl. 128 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1960
Helvering v. Limestone Co., 315 U.S. 179 (1942). … Penfield v. Davis, 105 F. Supp. at 311.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHong-Yee Chiu v. United States
6 Cl. Ct. 18 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 2, 1984
See Nibali v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 8 , 634 F.2d 494 (1980). See also, Nibali v. United States, 218 Ct.Cl. 547 , 589 F.2d 514 (1978); Duvall v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 711 (1983) (NET-TESHEIM, J.). … before they are presented to a court, where the party has prevailed before the board.
Cited 5 timesPublished362 F.2d 281 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966
Tibbals v. … In Braunstein v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPatrick Warren Construction Co. v. United States
129 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1954
The Supreme Court in Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … This court said in Owens v. United States, 123 C.
Cited 0 timesPublished100 Ct. Cl. 298 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1943
He was paid the allowances of an officer without dependents for all of the period of his service, except the period during which he was assigned to duty on board the U. S. S. Monocacy. … Mumma v. United States, 99 C. Cls. 261.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVinegar Hill Zinc Co. v. United States
149 Ct. Cl. 494 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960
ARTICLE V. … The appeal was heard by a Board of Review. The Board determined that all of the causes *513 of delay were beyond the control of the plaintiff.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilliam A. Steimer v. The United States
309 F.2d 412 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1962
STEIMER v. The UNITED STATES. No. 111-61. United States Court of Claims. November 7, 1962. Fred W. Shields, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Katherine H. Johnson, Alexandria, Va., with whom was Joseph D. … Corps to the Board, advising that acceptance of plaintiff's resignation "resulted in a complete separation from the service" effective August 11, 1943. 22 It was the opinion of the Board that: 1) plaintiff could not hold
Cited 0 timesPublished67 Ct. Cl. 294 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1929
The defendant offered in evidence the report of the inspection and survey made by the Joint Merchant Vessel Board of the Army and Navy. No member of this board was called as a witness for defendant. … In Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States, 256 U.
Cited 1 timesPublished41 Ct. Cl. 76 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1906
the ships, although he boarded each one as it came in for that purpose. … S., 214; Bulkley v. United States, 7 C. Cls. R., 543 .)
Cited 4 timesPublished23 Ct. Cl. 132 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 13, 1888
In support of this theory of the law, our attention is called to the cases of Leopold v. United States, 18 C. Cls. R., 546 ; Redgrave v. Same, 116 U. S. R., 474 ; Perkins v. Same , id., 483 . … (Deming v. United States, 1 C. Cls. R., 190 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished11 Cl. Ct. 17 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1986
Johnson was on the board of directors of St. Jo Parent during 1979, had been on the board when the decision to form Capital was made, and was aware of the general nature of Equity’s business. … See Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 579 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1171 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965) (Harlan, J., concurring).
Cited 13 timesPublished72 Ct. Cl. 459 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931
On December 22, 1903, Assistant Comptroller Mitchell, in response to a reference of the Secretary of the' Navy, was confronted with the following facts: A carpenter’s mate while on board the Franklin at Norfolk, Virginia, … See Conrad v. United States, 32 C. Cls. 139 ; Dodge v. United States, 33 C. Cls. 28 ; Walsh v. United States, 43 C. Cls. 225 ; Carrington v. United States, 46 C. Cls. 279 .
Cited 3 timesPublished6 Cl. Ct. 531 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1984
of this court’s earlier order denying defendant’s and plaintiff’s cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 In reaching its earlier decision, the court considered the issues of whether an Air Force Reserve Officer Screening Board … Indeed, with regard to selection boards, the court in Foster has noted that there is no such duty. 3 Cl.Ct. at 444, citing Gilmore v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 829, 832 (1981) .
Cited 15 timesPublishedA & S Council Oil Co. v. United States
35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,656 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1989
The Board, therefore, dismissed the appeal because it was not filed within 90 days, as required. … United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 , 89 S.Ct. 1501 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). We are, therefore, without jurisdiction to hear this case under the CDA. Thoen v. United States, 765 F.2d at 1116 , and Joseph Morton Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNorth American Aviation, Inc. v. United States
67 F. Supp. 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1946
At that meeting the board of directors was elected, bylaws were adopted, and the board was authorized to issue shares of capital stock. … Flint v. Stone Tracy Company, 220 U. S. 107 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedCentex Construction Co. v. United States
162 Ct. Cl. 211 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1963
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 490 ; National Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 308 . … The Board denied plaintiff’s appeal in a decision of August 19, 1960, on the ground that the Board had no authority to review a decision of an FHA official.
Cited 9 timesPublished618 F.2d 119 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1979
Plaintiff appealed, and his firing was affirmed by the Civil Service Commission Appeals Review Board. Plaintiff initiated an action in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. … See Stilley v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 982 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 999 (1968); Edgar v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 9 , 171 F. Supp. 243 (1959).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna