Case law

Byrnes v. United States

70 Ct. Cl. 261 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1930

Day, 88 Kan. 503 ; *265 Gammons v. Gammons, 212 Mass. 454 ; Gilliam v. Guaranty Trust Co., 186 N. Y. 127 , 78 N. E. 697 . … W. 635 ; Brown v. Welch, 27 N. J. 429; Moncrief v. Ely, 19 Wend. (N. Y.) 405.

Bailey v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 148 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 3, 1983

Buchanan v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 291, 310 , 621 F.2d 373, 382-83 (1980); Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 302 , 594 F.2d 804, 813-14 (1979); see also Boyd v. … In Kelly v.

Walker v. United States

229 Ct. Cl. 695 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1981

Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974); Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 145 , 391 F.2d 938 (1968), aff’d on rehearing, 190 Ct. Cl. 925 , 421 F.2d 703 (1970). … See, Homcy v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 332 , 536 F.2d 360 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 984 (1976); Rumph v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 855 (1981).

Continental Insurance v. United States

474 F.2d 661 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1973

In Phoenix Insurance Co. v. … See, e.g., Commissioner v.

Mancon Liquidating Corp.

210 Ct. Cl. 695 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1976

“In this contracts renegotiation case plaintiff, Mancon Liquidating Corp., comes before the court seeking a de novo determination of excessive profits found by the Renegotiation Board for the fiscal year ending July 31,1967 … See, e.g., Societe Internationale v. Brownell, 357 U.S. 197 (1958); Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 376 F. 2d 118 (5th Cir. 1967); Fisher v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 246 F. 2d 344 (7th Cir. 1957).

Woolverton v. United States

26 Ct. Cl. 215 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1891

Brown, contractor, by addition of service not specified in the advertisement for the contract beginning July 1,1886, and the orders relieving the contractor of such service — i. e., all papers in connection with ordering … (Whitmoer v. The South Boston Iron Co., 2 Allen, 60 .)” In the case cited ( 107 U. S.

Blackburn

227 Ct. Cl. 602 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1981

On July 1, 1969 plaintiff became chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Management Technology, Inc. (MTI). … On July 28, 1980 Trial Judge Joseph V.

Walsh v. United States

43 Ct. Cl. 225 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1908

(McClaughry v. Deming, 186 U. S., 49 .) Therefore the sum of $480.25 which was withheld from plaintiff’s pay must be allowed. (Brown v. United States, 206 U. S. R., 240 , and McClaughry v. Deming, supra.) … Cls., 206 ; Winters v. United States, 3 ibid., 136; Collins v. United States, 15 ibid., 22; Sullivan v. United States, 32 ibid., 402, and Dodge v. United States, 33 ibid., 35).

Meredith v. United States

121 F. Supp. 622 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1954

S. 106 , 15 Pet. 336 ; and The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 194 . … The case of United States v.

Barnard-Curtiss Company v. The United States

301 F.2d 909 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

The pertinent parts of the Board’s decision are set forth in findings 24 and 27. … Plaintiff takes the same position herein as it did before the Board.

Dugan & McNamara, Inc. v. United States

127 F. Supp. 801 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1955

United States v. … Winner, 7 Cir., 28 F.2d 295 ; United States v. Brown, D.C., 6 F.Supp. 331 . Here, however, we do not have the term standing apart.

Pinkston v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,886 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 14, 1984

See Transcountry Packing Co. v. United States, 215 Ct.Cl. 390, 395 , 568 F.2d 1333, 1336 (1978); ATL, Inc. v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 672, 676 (1984); Dynalectron Corp. v. … Illustrative of the Court’s position is Ber-dick v.

Murphy

650 F.2d 286 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 29, 1980

Under date of March 13, 1979, the new Merit Systems Protection Board ruled that the case was not within its jurisdiction. This suit was filed April 23, 1979. … Gaskins v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 918 (1979). Under the old law there can be no question but that a plaintiff here has to have a claim for money. Otherwise, we lack jurisdiction. United States v.

Casman v. United States

135 Ct. Cl. 647 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Laeamoke, Judge, delivered tbe opinion of tbe court: Plaintiff alleges that be was illegally separated from his position as a member of tbe Board of Review, Office of tbe Military Governor, Germany, United States Area of … . * * * *649 In Wessel, Duval & Co., Inc., v. United States, 129 C.

Willis v. United States

156 Ct. Cl. 485 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1962

the publication of the Selection List which contained notice of plaintiff’s selection for temporary promotion to the temporary rank of lieutenant colonel on August 26,1952, plaintiff appeared before a Physical Evaluation Board … For the purpose of determining plaintiff’s right to recover, the issues presented are the same as those decided in the case of Kratz v. United States, ante, p. 480, also decided March 7, 1962.

Federal Export Corp. v. United States

25 F. Supp. 109 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1938

Commissioner v. Ginsburg Co., 54 F. (2d) 238, 239. … It is argued that the cases of Atlantia City Co. v. Com missionary 288 U. S. 152 , and Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Co., 287 U.

Woodward v. United States

109 F. Supp. 414 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953

Andrews v. Stinson, 254 Ill. 111, 123-4 ; 98 N. E. 222 . *84 No new partnership was formed between Grinnell F. Oliver and the estate of James Hugh Oliver after June 14, 1944. On July 27,1944, Grinnell F. … In the letter of May 14, 1946, the Navy Price Adjustment Board stated: If you are still willing to enter into such agreement please execute and return three copies thereof (together with appropriate resolution of your Board

American Standard, Inc. v. United States

602 F.2d 256 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1979

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Defendant does not deny that the change makes a material shift in the tax liability of many consolidated groups.

Dorris Motor Car Co. v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 68 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1924

Not only this, but when the claim of amounts to be allowed was in issue, plaintiff accepted the award of the claims board as approved by the Ordnance Claims Board. … S. 430 ; Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United States, 262 U. S. 489 . The petition should be dismissed. And it is so ordered. GRAHAM, judge; Hat, judge; DowNey, judge, and Booth, judge, concur.

Feener Technical Schools, Inc. v. United States

141 F. Supp. 777 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

Plaintiff presented its case to the Veterans’ Education Appeals Board under Public Law 610, supra. That- Board found against it on the issues presented tp it. … The Board determined that it did not and we think the. Board was right.