Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

3.15s

  • Uintah & White River Bands of Ute Indians v. United States

    152 F. Supp. 953 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

    In that respect the case is like United States v. Creek Nation, 295 U. S. 103 , and Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United States, 299 U. S. 476 . … Board.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Gulf Transit Co. v. United States

    43 Ct. Cl. 183 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1908

    (Hexamer v. Webb, 101 N. Y., 377 ; Merchants' National Bank v. State National Bank, 10 Wall., 604 ; Frankfort Bank v. Johnson, 24 Me., 490; Kimball v. Cushman, 103 Mass., 194 .) … (Lincoln v. Gray, 164 Mass., 537 ; Zell v. Dunkle, 156 Pa. St., 353.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center of Greater Miami, Inc. v. United States

    23 Cl. Ct. 691 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 9, 1991

    Because the 180-day time limit for review to the PRRB had long passed, that board did not have jurisdiction to consider the reimbursement. … Luke’s Medical Center v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 322 (1991) quoting from John Muir Memorial Hospital, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Harley v. United States

    39 Ct. Cl. 105 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 21, 1903

    R.., 396) the War Department appointed a board of officers to consider the militaiy devices which inventors were presenting for sale. … As was said in the case of Boston v. District of Columbia, ( 19 C. Cls. R., 31 ): “An implied contract does not arise from a merely voluntary service.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Patterson

    578 F.2d 1389 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1978

    The Commission’s Bureau of Retirement, Insurance and Occupational Health refused to make the change and its decision was affirmed by the Board of Appeals and Review. … See Nordstrom v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 632, 639 , 342 F.2d 55, 59-60 (1965); Lawrenson v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 370, 372-73 , 153 F. Supp. 790, 791-92 (1957).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • H & H Manufacturing Co. v. United States

    201 Ct. Cl. 799 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 8, 1973

    Co. v. United States, 168 Ct. … Co. v. United States, 168 Ct.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • O'Brien v. United States

    148 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

    We need not consider appellee’s other contentions. [ 269 F. 2d 227 ] Defendant pleads estoppel by judgment, relying on the decisions of this court in Edgar v. United States, 145 C. Cls. 9 ; Larsen v. … Cls. 178 ; and Green v. United States, 145 C. Cls. 628 . There is, however, a substantial difference between those cases and this one.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Service Technicians, Inc.

    513 F.2d 638 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1975

    . — Plaintiff seeks additional compensation under a fixed-price contract for performance of various custodial services at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, following denial of its claim by the Armed Services Board of Contract … See Space Corp. v. United States, 200 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Preston Haglin Co.

    193 Ct. Cl. 1078 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 21, 1970

    not constitute an increase in an excise tax on the transactions or property covered by the contract within the meaning of the contract provision, was unsuccessfully appealed to the Veterans Administration Contract Appeals Board … The parties filed a joint motion to suspend proceedings pending a decision on the merits in Morrison-Knudsen v. United States, No. 3-69, involving the same issue, which motion was allowed. On June 12, 1970 ( 192 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • L. I. Waldman & Co. v. United States

    106 Ct. Cl. 159 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1946

    From this board feeders ran to about 99 panelboards, each panel-board serving to distribute energy to several branch circuits which supplied lighting and other fixtures in areas of a few rooms to each circuit. … Williams Engineering & Contracting Co. v. The United States, 55 C. Cls. 349, 377 ; Ohio River Contract Co. v. The United States, 45 C. Cls. 542 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gorman v. United States

    102 Ct. Cl. 260 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1944

    See, also, to the same effect, Allen v. Hammond, 11 Pet. 63 ; National Bank v. Hall, 101 U. … Louis Hay & Grain, Co. v. United States, 191 U. S. 159 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nesbitt v. United States

    170 Ct. Cl. 666 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965

    John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 381 , 325 F. 2d 438 (1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 931 (1964); Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 465 , 325 F. 2d 446 (1963). Cf. Goldwasser v. … Cl. 566, 568-569 (1963); Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, supra, 163 Ct. Cl. at 472, 325 F. 2d at 450; Litchfield Mfg. Corp. v. United States, supra, 167 Ct.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Western Pacific Railroad v. United States

    131 F. Supp. 921 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

    Atlantic Coast Line v. Florida, 295 U. S. 301, 317 ; Illinois Central R. R. Co., et al, v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 206 U. S. 441 ; Davis v. Prairie Pipe Line Co., 298 F. 393, 397 ; Empire Refining Co. v. … Davis, 6 F. 2d 305 ; Updike Grain Corp. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co., 52 F. 2d 94 ; Emmons Coal Mining Co. v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co., 272 U. S. 709, 712 ; Crancer v. Lowden, 315 U. S. 631, 634-35 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Westvaco Corp. v. United States

    639 F.2d 700 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1980

    Whipple v. United States, 25 F.2d 520 (D. Mass. 1928); Nash v. Commissioner, 22 B.T.A. 482 (1931); Davis v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 65 (1929); Hall v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 71 (1929). Rosenthal v. … Whipple v. United States, supra note 16. See, e.g., Helvering v. Owens, 305 U.S. 468 (1939); Alcoma Ass’n v. United States, 239 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1956); United States v. Koshland, 208 F.2d 636 (9th Cir. 1953); Knapp v.

    Questioned by International Paper Co. v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 313 (1996)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McKamey v. United States

    458 F.2d 47 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

    Plaintiff then appealed to the Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission which, in its decision dated November 16, 1966, sustained four of the seven remaining charges. … See Ricucci v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 1 , 425 F.2d 1252 (1970); Tierney v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 77 (1964); Mallow v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 207 (1963); Washington v. United States, 137 Ct. Cl. 344 , 147 F.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corporation v. United States

    295 F.2d 939 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1961

    The Government cites, as more in accord with its view in the action before this court, the dissent of board member Phillips in Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. Commissioner, 9 B.T.A. 1087, 1099 (1928). … See Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Kraemer, 219 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.1955). Graves, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Testan v. United States

    499 F.2d 690 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1974

    Plaintiffs try cases before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA). The comparison attorneys do so also, on behalf of the Air Force Logistics Command (AFLC) at Dayton, Ohio. … We do that in Selman v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 675 , 498 F. 2d 1354 (1974). Compare, also, Jarett v. United States, 195 Ct. Cl. 320 , 451 F. 2d 623 (1971).

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kenney

    566 F.2d 1189 · United States Court of Claims · May 27, 1977

    The final administrative decision, that of the CSC Board of Appeals and Review (BAR), upheld the removal action. … Power v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 126, 129-30 , 531 F. 2d 505, 507 (1976); Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 27, 34 , 515 F. 2d 1397, 1401 (1975); Poschl v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 672, 691-92 (1975); Ricci v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bahamas-Cuban Co. v. United States

    77 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1933

    The vessels were then being operated by the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation through its agents, the Clinchfield Navigation Company. … Matson Navigation Co. v. United States, 284 U.S. 352 ; Johnson v. U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 280 U.S. 320 ; U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co., 276 U.S. 202 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lathan Co. v. United States

    36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,842 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 10, 1990

    Wrecking Corp. v. United States, 732 F.2d 913, 916 (Fed.Cir.1984). … Co. v. United States, 157 Ct.Cl. 409, 415 (1962).

    Cited 88 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.