Case law

Staskus v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 633 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 10, 1982

[See Keener v. United States, 165 Ct.Cl. 334, 341 (1964).] The Board will review contentions that personnel actions initiated after a reduction in force were used to deny employees of their reduction-in-force rights. … This is the type of review which the Regional Office and the Board made concerning your allegation that your position had not been abolished.

Schmoll v. United States

86 Ct. Cl. 632 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1938

Boards, 1" x variable widths_ 2, 700 B. M. Posts and rails, 2” x 4", variable lengths_ 1,700 B. M. … Recovery under this item is allowable under the following cases: Weller Construction Co. v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 261 Gearing v. United States, 48 C. Cls. 12 .

Amerikohl Mining, Inc. v. United States

16 Cl. Ct. 623 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 12, 1989

Citing Abbott Laboratories v. … Relying on Drummond Coal Co. v.

Achille F. Ford v. United States. Jeanne F. Harlow v. United States

276 F.2d 17 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

opinion of Commissioner White of this court and adopt the same as a part of this dissenting opinion as follows: I believe that the correct principles governing the disposition of these cases were stated in Alamo National Bank v. … The Board of Tax Appeals held that the Alexanders were estopped to assert the higher valuation, and the Board’s decision was subsequently reviewed by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Jasper v. United States

38 Ct. Cl. 202 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1903

The counsel for defendants has raised a jurisdictional question, to wit, that the finding of the retiring board, approved by the Secretary of the Navjq is final and can not be reviewed by the courts. … Under the decision of the Supreme Court in the recent case of Medbury v. The United States ( 173 U.

Newbury v. United States

57 F. Supp. 168 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1944

On appeal, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … In this opinion the Circuit Court said: “The Board of Tax Appeals heretofore held in the case of Newbury v.

Schuenemeyer v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 417 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1985

Ellis v. United States, 711 F.2d 1571, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1983). … See Bailey v. United States, supra, 721 F.2d at 361 .

Burke v. United States

8 Cl. Ct. 75 · United States Court of Claims · May 8, 1985

Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804, 813 , 219 Ct.Cl. 285 (1979). See also Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1155 (CAFC 1983); Horn v. … A fortiori, the 1979 affirmation of that statutory interpretation by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records cannot be deemed contrary to law in any respect.

Cushing v. United States

22 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1886

We are again cited to Bas v. … , whom he shall not take on board without the knowledge and permission of the officers of the marine.”

Engagement off Santiago Bay

36 Ct. Cl. 200 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1901

Panther, a transport, was landed at Guantanamo Bay June 10, 1898, and remained on shore until August 5, 1898, when the battalion embarked on board the U. S. S. … He asks the Attorney-General to invite the court’s attention to the case of Swan v. United States ( 19 C. Cls.

Con P. Curran Printing Co. v. United States

14 F. Supp. 638 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1936

It was held, however, that such decisions might be reviewed by the Board of Tax Appeals. … Some statements were made in McKeever v.

St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United States

37 Ct. Cl. 281 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1902

(United States v. Bostwick, 94 U. S. R., 53 .) But nevertheless it has been uniformly held by this court since Kirkham & Brown ( 4 C. Cls. … (Savage v. United States, 92 U. S. R., 382 .)

Barnett v. United States

617 F.2d 230 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1980

Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723, 726 ) or trial by ordeal (Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278, 285 ) than a disciplined contest. Placed against this test, the facts are not persuasive in plaintiffs favor. … Hendrix v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 50 , 555 F.2d 785 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 849 (1977); Flute v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 34 , 535 F.2d 624 (1976); McDonald v. United States, 209 Ct.

Plumley v. United States

43 Ct. Cl. 266 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 9, 1908

The present controversy in most respects is fully determined by the case of McLaughlin & Co. v. United States ( 37 C. Cls., 150 ). … (Alvord v. United States, 8 C. Cls. R., 364 , and authorities there cited.)

Husman Bros.

201 Ct. Cl. 887 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 27, 1973

(See Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 757 , 345 F. 2d 833 (1965).) … Co. v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1 , 355 F. 2d 573 (1966).)”

Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United States

61 Ct. Cl. 397 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1925

Under the decision of the Supreme Court in Brothers v. United States, 250 U. … Brown, to whom he had made assignment pending the application.

National Life Ins. Co. v. United States

4 F. Supp. 1000 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1933

S. v. Katz, 271 U. S. 354 , 46 S. Ct. 513 , 76 L. Ed. 986 ; Hellmich v. Hellman, 276 U. S. 233 , 48 S. Ct. 244 , 72 L. Ed. 544 , 56 A. L. R. 379. … Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. U. S., supra.

Gross v. United States

357 F.2d 368 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1966

In support of this theory, plaintiffs place much emphasis on the case of Padbloc Company, Inc. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 369 (1963). … On August 15, 1952, the Board issued a “Draft Report, Department of the Army Installations Board, [Tentative].” At that time said report was classified “Secret-Security Information.” 43.

Carman v. United States

166 F. Supp. 759 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1958

A hearing was held before the Corps of Engineers’ Claims and Appeals Board at which testimony was taken and plaintiff was represented by counsel. … Tacoma Dredging Co. v. United States, 52 C. Cls. 447 . See also The Arundel Corporation v. United States, 103 C.

J. A. Ross & Co. v. United States

115 F. Supp. 187 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 6, 1953

Stafford v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 479 ; Parish v. United States 120 C. Cls. 100 , and numerous other cases. … See, among others, William Eisenberg & Sons v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 388 . Defendant has breached this implied obligation in two instances in this case.