Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
2.00s
Continental Contracting Co. v. United States
94 Ct. Cl. 244 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1941
(See The Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company v. United States, 93 C. Cls. 138 .) … The Board, under Article 27 of the General Provisions of the specifications, functioned only when the estimate of the officer in charge exceeded $500, and, in the absence of such an estimate, the Board had nothing to consider
Cited 0 timesPublished98 F. Supp. 349 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1951
But see the concurring opinion of Justice Brown, concurred in by Justices Shiras and Peckham, in United States v. Lynah, 188 U.S. 445 , 23 S.Ct. 349 , 47 L.Ed. 539 . … In United States v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRoberts Dairy Co. v. United States
530 F.2d 1342 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1976
Calico Scallop Corp. v. Willis Bros., Inc., 458 F. 2d 390 , 173 USPQ 321 (4th Cir. 1972); Tate Engineering, Inc. v. United States, supra. V. … Yassin v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 211, 229 , 76 F. Supp. 509, 520 , 76 USPQ 466 , 475 (1948); Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedAmerikohl Mining, Inc. v. United States
16 Cl. Ct. 623 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 12, 1989
Citing Abbott Laboratories v. … Relying on Drummond Coal Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished37 F.2d 775 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 10, 1930
Farish & Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 31 F.(2d) 79 . … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in Douglas County Light & Water Co., 14 B. T.
Cited 5 timesPublished19 Ct. Cl. 145 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1884
In the case of Thornly v. The United States ( 18 C. Cls. … And in the case of Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRaybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. United States
10 F. Supp. 130 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1935
United States v. Brown Fence & Wire Co. (D. C. Northern Dist. Ohio) 9 F. Supp. 1008 , January 31, 1935; C. C. TI. Tax Service, vol. 3, par. 9144; P.H. Tax Service, vol. 1, par. 869.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDynalectron Corp. v. United States
31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,150 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1984
The rulings did not come on a request for temporary or preliminary extraordinary relief, which might not trigger the law of the case doctrine, see Board of Trade v. … See Brubaker v. Board of Education, 502 F.2d 973, 990 n. 5 (7th Cir.1974); see also Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 , 347 n. 18, 99 S.Ct. 1139 , 1148 n. 18, 59 L.Ed.2d 358 (1978).
Cited 38 timesPublished130 F. Supp. 598 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955
Addison Miller, Inc. v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 513 ; Kremer v. United States, 116 C. Cls. 358 . … Coath & Goss, Inc. v. United States, 101 C. Cls. 702 , 714; Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States, 79 C. Cls. 25, 36 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedCorporate Air v. United States
26 Cl. Ct. 204 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1992
Co. v. … Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedValenzuela v. Office of Personnel Management
231 Ct. Cl. 907 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 20, 1982
former guard in the Security Department of the United States Naval Base at Subic Bay, Philippines, who has been denied a civil service annuity by the Office of Personnel Management (opm) and the Merit Systems Protection Board … In Guevara v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl. 595 (1981), we specifically held that a Filipino with a comparable claim of indefinite, excepted service (but insufficient covered service) could not recover.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJ. Allen Smith & Co. v. United States
59 F. Supp. 133 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1945
The resolution of the board of directors did not satisfy that test. It created no debt to the stockholders. … Allen Smith & Co. v. United States, 93 C. Cls. 227 , should prevent the plaintiff from recovering in this case.
Cited 0 timesPublished221 Ct. Cl. 974 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 21, 1979
On January 21, 1977, the United States Civil Service Commission Appeals Review Board declined to reopen or reconsider the decision of the hearing officer. … Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972); Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 (1968); see also Mazaleski v. Treusdell, 562 F. 2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished7 Cl. Ct. 417 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1985
Ellis v. United States, 711 F.2d 1571, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1983). … See Bailey v. United States, supra, 721 F.2d at 361 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedFehlhaber Corporation v. United States
151 F. Supp. 817 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957
151 F.Supp. 817 (1957) FEHLHABER CORPORATION v. The UNITED STATES. No. 49316. United States Court of Claims. June 5, 1957. *818 John W. Gaskins, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. … See Loftis v. United States, 76 F.Supp. 816 , 110 Ct.Cl. 551 ; Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States, 74 F.Supp. 165 , 109 Ct. Cl. 517 ; Walsh Brothers v. United States, 69 F.Supp. 125 , 107 Ct.Cl. 627 ; Hirsch v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedKaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United States
152 Ct. Cl. 641 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1961
The conclusions stated by the Board in its report as the basis for the disposal program which the Surplus Property Board was then forming are shown below: 1. … U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F. 2d 416 . Not in evidence. See finding 94.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMenominee Tribe of Indians v. United States
91 F. Supp. 917 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1950
United States v. Minnesota, 270 U.S. 181 , 46 S.Ct. 298 , 70 L.Ed. 539 ; United States v. Wisconsin, 273 U.S. 769 , 47 S.Ct. 20 , 71 L.Ed. 883 . … In Menominee Tribe v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedChapter of Calvary Cathedral v. United States
29 Ct. Cl. 269 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1894
(Swain v. Seamens, 9 Wall., 254, 272 .) These decisions were followed by the decision in Clark’s Case ( 95 U. … The claimant has cited in support of its contention the case of Post v. Pearson ( 108 U. S., 418 ), and the authorities therein cited in 101 U. S., 392 ; 105 U.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAchille F. Ford v. United States. Jeanne F. Harlow v. United States
276 F.2d 17 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960
opinion of Commissioner White of this court and adopt the same as a part of this dissenting opinion as follows: I believe that the correct principles governing the disposition of these cases were stated in Alamo National Bank v. … The Board of Tax Appeals held that the Alexanders were estopped to assert the higher valuation, and the Board’s decision was subsequently reviewed by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Cited 27 timesPublishedNational Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. United States
170 Ct. Cl. 617 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965
National Bank v. Insurance Company, 104 U.S. 54 (1881); Chemical National Bank v. Hartford *620 Deposit Company 161 U.S. 1 (1896); Rosenblatt v. John ston, 104 U.S. 462 (1881). … Defendant relies mainly on Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los Angeles v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna