Case law

Alcan Electrical & Engineering Co. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,250 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1992

Inc. v. … Co. v.

Erie Railroad Co. v. United States

79 Ct. Cl. 102 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

The plaintiff, on the other hand, resorting to the same official Consolidated Freight Classification, contends that, whereas the articles were not indexed 'by name, rule IT of the Classification Board is applicable. … United States v. Gulf Refining Co., 268 U.S. 542 .

Ottinger Bros. Construction Co. v. United States

121 F. Supp. 640 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1954

The decision ■of the Wage Stabilization Board dated May 23,1946, applied after that date to members of Carpenters Local Union No. •812, and stated that it applied only to non-Federal construction. … A very similar question to the one involved here was decided by the United States Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Binghamton Construction Co., Inc., which decision was rendered March 8, 1954 ( 347 U.

Johnson Motor Co. v. United States

6 F. Supp. 122 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

It would have then been a capital and not a business expense, as held in Athol Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 54 F.(2d) 230 , and as the Board of Tax Appeals has repeatedly held. … Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U. S. 101 , 48 S. Ct. 43 , 72 L. Ed. 184 . The evidence in this case fails to sustain the burden and, on the contrary, lends support to the Commissioner’s decision.

Davis Airfoils, Inc. v. United States

110 F. Supp. 460 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1953

Bruington, executive officer of The Royalty Adjustment Board. … or under which Licensor may *506 have any right to grant licenses, during the term hereinafter defined, to manufacture, use, sell, and/or otherwise dispose of the Commodity including disposition to lend-lease countries v/

American President Lines, Ltd. v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 695 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

Bull Steamship Company v. United States, 123 Ct. Cl. 520 (1952), and Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United States, 127 Ct. Cl. 409 (1953). … Other cases in this court applying comparably relevant principles are Clapp v. United States, 127 Ct. Cl. 505 (1954) and Suwannee S.S. Corp. v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 331 (1960).

Nelson v. United States

126 Ct. Cl. 553 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1953

Poggas v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 385 ; Parmenter v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 35 . … It fixes the workweek of wage-board employees of the United States at forty hours, and provides for one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for work in excess of forty hours.

Aikins v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 622 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 7, 1929

commissioned as an officer in any rank in any class of the Naval Reserve Force, or promoted to a higher rank therein, unless he shall have been examined and recommended for such appointment, commission, or promotion by a board … The case is controlled by the decision of this court in Otis Beeman v. United States, D-129, decided April 16, 1928, 65 C. Cls. 431 , and the cases therein cited.

Houston v. United States

297 F.2d 838 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1962

The Board of Appeals and Review affirmed on appeal without opinion. … Kenny v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 442 , cert. denied 352 U.S. 893 ; Armand v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 339 ; Adams v. United States, 137 Ct. Cl. 52 ; Thompson v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 200 .

General Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. United States

115 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1949

Some time later plaintiff submitted to the War Production Board an application for a permit to construct a pipe line which application was denied by the Office of War Utilities of the War Production Board on October 23, 1943 … United States v. Penn Foundry and Mfg. Co., 337 U. S. 198 .

Richard v. United States

152 Ct. Cl. 225 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1960

We reiterate what we said in Cotton Land Co. v. United States, 109 Ct. … Dick v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 424 ; and compare United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 375 ; Richelderfer v. Quinn, 287 U.S. 315, 323 .

Cardell

578 F.2d 1389 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1978

The Board for Correction of Naval Records on March 3, 1977, recommended that this record be corrected to show a general discharge, by reason of convenience of the service, and this has been done. … See Order in Holbrook v.

Everman National Bank v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 118 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 10, 1984

House’s Grade A permit, section 551 of the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS (1977) — which was cited with approval by the Supreme Court in Chiarella v. … The cows were purebred Holsteins and Brown Swiss, except that in 1974, at least, he had a few crossbred, half-and-half Holstein-Brown Swiss cows. 4. Before September 1974, the Bank made various loans to Mr.

Larsen v. United States

170 F. Supp. 806 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959

There is also attached to the motion a letter written by the Chairman of the Civil Service Board of Appeals and Eeview denying to plaintiffs further administrative review of their claims after the above decisions of the Court … The identical issue was decided by this court in the case of Edgar v.

Spicer v. United States

5 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869

.; Gardner v. Buckbee, 3 Cow. R., 126; Coles v. Carter, 6 id., p. 691; Lawrence v. Hunt, 10 Wend. R., p. 82; Walsh v. Ostrander, 22 id., p. 180; Wood v. Jackson, 8 id., 37 ; Doty v. Brown, 4 Comst. … But, at length, it was decisively held in Doty v. Brown, (4 Comst.

International Institute for Fundamental Studies, Inc.

222 Ct. Cl. 626 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1980

Board of Appeals of Cook County, 543 F. 2d 32 (7th Cir. 1976). … Board of Appeals of Cook County, supra.

Corporate Air v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 204 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1992

Co. v. … Corp. v.

Jo C. Calhoun, Jr., and Esther C. Young, Executors of the Estate of Niels A. Christensen, Deceased v. The United States

354 F.2d 337 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

Fulton Co., 37 F.2d 293 (6th Cir. 1930) (accounting allowed until expiration of the patent); Parker et al. v. Brown & Root et al., 198 F.Supp. 795 (D.C.S.D. … In Ushakoff et al. v.

California and Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corporation, Limited v. The United States

311 F.2d 235 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1962

This distinction is clearly drawn by the Supreme Court in Burnet v. … See Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co., supra, p. 185 of 247 U.S. [179] 185 [ 38 S.Ct. 467 , 62 L.Ed. 1054 ].” This case was quoted with approval by the Supreme Court in Dobson v.

McDonald v. United States

90 F. Supp. 703 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950

Cost has never been the measure of just compensation, Vogelstein & Co. v. United States, 262 U. S. 337, 340 ; Commodities Trading Corporation v. United States, 339 U. … In Smith-Douglass Co. v.