Case law

Bolin

618 F.2d 124 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 2, 1979

Hebern et al. v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 344 ; Nuss et al. v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 197 ; Kaplan v. United States, 139 C. Cls. 682 . … Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380, 384 (1947); Haight v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 698 , cert. denied, 429 U. S. 841 (1976); Brown v. United States, 207 Ct.

Men's & Boys' Apparel Club of Florida v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 147 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1964

These sections of the Codes exempt: Business leagues, chambers of commerce, real-estate boards, or boards of trade, not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder … See Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 682 (1963), 320 F. 2d 375 , cert. denied, 376 U.S. 931 (1964); United States v.

Marshall v. United States

26 F. Supp. 474 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1939

The precise issue now raised by plaintiff was presented to the Board of Tax Appeals in the case of Howard C. Hickman v. Commissioner, 27 B. T. A. 807. … The Board of Tax Appeals reversed the holding of the Commissioner, and an appeal was taken to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth District under the title of Helvering, Commissioner, v. Hickman, 70 Fed. (2d) 985.

Weinstein v. United States

74 F. Supp. 554 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1947

Elchibegoff v. United States, 106 C. Cls. 541 , which we do not think is controlling in the instant case.. … Her removal by the Secretary was a legal exercise of his power of removal, Burnap v. United States, 252 U. S. 512 .

Levinson v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 203 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 20, 1982

Sexton v. … of the Board of Appeals and Review on the issues of your appeal.

J. F. Barbour & Sons v. United States

63 F. Supp. 348 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1944

moved its equipment to the site and began work on April 17, 1942; that at a later but unspecified date-it became necessary in order to continue with the work to have certain priority orders issued by the War’ Production Board … Gothwaite v.

Noel Construction Co. v. United States

50 Ct. Cl. 98 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1915

The facts in this case are very much like those in the case of Maryland Steel Co. v. … United States v. Cramp & Sons, 206 U.

Town of Kure Beach v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 597 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

Cl. 41 (1960), 282 F. 2d 728 ; Jones v. United States, 1 Ct. Cl. 383 (1865); and Horowitz v. … Deming v. United States, 1 Ct. *617 Cls. 190, 191; Jones v. United States, 1 Ct. Cls. 383, 384; Wilson v. United States, 11 Ct. Cls. 513, 520.

Chicago Junction Rys. & Union Stock Yards Co. v. United States

52 F.2d 906 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1931

United States v. Flannery, 268 U. S. 98 [ 45 S. Ct. 420 , 69 L. Ed. 865 ], and United States v. Ludey, 274 U. S. 295 [ 47 S. Ct. 608 , 71 L. Ed. 1054 ], where deductions were confined to actual losses.” … This question was decided in favor of the government by the board, and in connection therewith the board said: “The petitioner argues that an analysis of the legislative, executive and administrative acts of the United States

Earnhardt

546 F.2d 429 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1976

The removal was affirmed by the Civil Service Commisr sion on June 11,- 1970, and that determination was in turn affirmed by the Board of Appeals and Review .on September 30, 1970. … See Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502, 509 , 504 F. 2d 1382, 1386 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975); Grisham v. United States, 183 Ct.

Gladding, McBean & Co. v. United States

101 F. Supp. 358 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1951

Arkansas Valley Railway, Inc. v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 240 , cert. den., 330 U. S. 811 ; John J. Felin & Co., Inc. v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 155 , rev’d., 334 U. S. 624 ; Samuel M. Coombs, Jr., Trustee v. … Notwithstanding this, however, these were the prices the War Production Board fixed under its “Tin Oxide Recovery Program.”

Berner v. United States

282 F.2d 720 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1960

Acting on the Gardners’ commitment, the board of directors approved the plan for redemption of the first preferred stock. … Bazley v.

Ramirez v. United States

538 F.2d 888 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1976

In Continental Oil Co. v. United States, 83 Ct. Cl. 344 , 14 F. … In Olds & Whipple, Inc. v. United States, 86 Ct. Cl. 705, 724 , 22 F.

Power v. United States

597 F.2d 258 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1979

Power v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 126 , 531 F.2d 505 . … Selman v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 675, 684 , 498 F. 2d 1354, 1358 (1974); Doggett v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 478, 482 (1975).

Standard Steel Car Co. v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 445 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1929

Walker v. United States, 143 Fed. 685 ; Joice v. United States, 51 C. Cls. 439 , and cases cited therein. … Plaintiff presented a claim for $4,529.31 to the Boston claims board for storage rental. This claim was based on the provisions above recited, and the board approved the claim in full.

Adler Metal Products Corp. v. United States

71 F. Supp. 239 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1947

Jones, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The issues in this requisition case are the same as in the claim of Kaiser and Kaiser v. United States [Ante, p. 47], with a shading of difference in the facts. … On June 2, 1943, the War Production Board duly requisitioned and took possession of 20,136,375 pounds of copper and copper-base alloy materials belonging to plaintiff.

George Leary Construction Co. v. United States

63 Ct. Cl. 206 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 23, 1927

The authorities sustaining the conclusiveness of the board’s decision are too many to warrant citation. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 633 . … Merritt v. United States, 267 U. S. 338 .

Bowling v. United States

181 Ct. Cl. 968 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1967

Bilello, et al. v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1253 (1966); Bantom,, et al. v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 312 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 890 ; Tabbutt, et al. v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 495 (1952). … The situation here is more like that in Bantom, et al. v.

Loehler v. United States

90 Ct. Cl. 158 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1940

United States v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 26 Fed. cases, Case No. 15437, page 461; Rowzee v. Pierce, 75 Miss. 846 ; Board of Education v. Kansas City, 62 Kan. *164 374 ; Kelly v. Town of Hayward, 192 Cal. 242 . … In the case of Bauer v.

McClenny v. United States

45 Ct. Cl. 305 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 28, 1910

This is borne out by the whole tenor of the statutory enactments in regard to the Public Health and Marine-Hospital Service, which limit the operations of this service to the “ aid of state or municipal boards of health.” … (Morgan's Steamship Co. v. Louisiana, 118 U. S., 455 .)