Case law

Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United States

424 F.2d 1370 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

. & Associates v. … Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States, supra. 16 . Of. WRB Corp. v.

Adler Construction Company, a Partnership Constituted of Harold C. Adler and Vera L. Adler, Partners v. The United States

423 F.2d 1362 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

Co. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 801 (1963). … for recovery of unliquidated damages, over which the Board had no jurisdiction (finding 79).

Abubot v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 296 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1982

Plaintiff was denied relief by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). … (See 5 C.F.R. § 53.104 (1945 Supp.); see also Vicente v.

Rothman

219 Ct. Cl. 595 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1979

See Whitecliff, Inc. v. United States, 210 Ct. … Overlook Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 60, 66-68 , 556 F. 2d 500, 502-04 (1977); Ulman v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 308, 318 , 558 F. 2d 1, 6 (1977); Gosman v. United States, 215 Ct.

Strauss v. United States

92 Ct. Cl. 546 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1940

There were nine officers called back to service ahead of plaintiff and plaintiff was not ordered to serve on “retiring or selection boards.” … See Dickerson v. United States, 89 C. Cls. 520 . It now appears that for a part of the period of plaintiff’s claim he was in fact the ninth officer on said list.

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. United States

74 F. Supp. 558 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1947

It cites a number of cases, including McCoach v. Minehill and Schuylkill Haven, R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 295 ; North Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Rothensies, 45 Fed. Supp. 486; Mahoning Coal R. Co. v. Higgins, 57 Fed. … Cls., 415, 422 ; Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107 ; Wisconsin Central Ry. Co. v. The United States, 70 C. Cls. 203, 231 .

Gregory v. United States

57 F. Supp. 962 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1944

Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States, 97 Ct.Cl. 613, 663-665 . The reports of the Claims Committees of Congress on the act disclose no intention to concede liability. … , until the decision of the Board has become final.”

Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 714 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1991

In a December 19, 1968 meeting of Mentor’s board of directors, the chairman of the board stated that this increase in capital was necessary for the insurance business that Mentor was undertaking. … Carnation Co. v.

A. B. Frank Co. v. United States

62 F. Supp. 860 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1945

Sumara v. United States, 129 Fed. (2d) 594; Weiss v. United States, 135 Fed. (2d) 889 ; Morristown Knitting Mills v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 552 556 ; Jaubert Bros. V. … Co. v. United States, supra, p. 113; Interwoven Stocking Co. v. United States, 144 Fed. (2d) 768 ; Root & McBride Co. V. United States, 136 Fed. (2d) 907; Hutsler Bros. V. United States, 33 Fed. Supp. 801; Ney v.

Broome v. United States

170 F. Supp. 613 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959

Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 8 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 827, 829, 830 . Moreover, in each instance Mrs. … V, 163(a).

Walsh

164 Ct. Cl. 745 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 28, 1964

In each case defendant moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that suit was filed more than six years after final action by the proper board (retiring board in these cases) and that the suits were therefore barred by … Cl. 1 , cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932 , and Harper v. United States, 159 Ct.

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States

470 F.2d 513 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

See, also Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 (1965); Houston v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 38, 46 , 297 F. 2d 838, 842 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 815 , reh. denied, 371 U.S. 906 (1962); and Chambers v. … The plaintiff did not comply with the Board’s request. 21.

McMullen v. United States

100 Ct. Cl. 323 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1943

While a retired officer or soldier is, for some purposes., in the military service, United States v. Tyler, 105 U. S. 244 . we think he is not in the service within the meaning of Section 942. … In Blake v. United States, 103 U. S. 227 , and Wallace v. United States, 257 U.

Halifax Engineering, Inc.

221 Ct. Cl. 915 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1979

However, on April 24, 1979, an order of the Wage Appeals Board remanding the matter to the Deputy Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division for a "final decision” shows that plaintiffs damage assessment still awaits a determination … See Leone v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 334, 338 (1974), regarding the importance of this notification.

Keco Industries, Inc.

199 Ct. Cl. 1020 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 17, 1972

The decision in S & E Contractors, Inc. v. … States, 406 U.S. 1 (1972), did not rest on the grounds of lack of judicial jurisdiction, and a contractor-claimant can waive the non-jurisdictional defense that the Government has no standing to contest a decision by a Board

Chase Candy Company v. United States

126 F. Supp. 521 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1954

Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 , 54 S.Ct. 8 , 78 L.Ed. 212 . … As stated by the court in Consolidated Freight Lines v.

Packard v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 1055 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1982

See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 119 , 125 & n.4, 340 F. 2d 663 , 667 & n.4, cert. denied, 381 U. S. 950 (1965). See also Somali Development Bank v. United States, 205 Ct. … See Brown v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 752, 754 (1977). See also Vaitkus v. United States, ante at 815, 816 n.1. *1057 it is therefore ordered that defendant’s motion for summary judgment be and is hereby granted.

Myers v. United States

92 Ct. Cl. 447 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1941

such boarding officers shall be allowed extra compensation for services in boarding vessels at night or on Sundays or holidays at the rates prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury as herein ■provided, the said extra compensation … In Ferguson v.

Wilner v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 260 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1992

Co. v. … Smith Contracting Co. v.

RSH Constructors, Inc. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,488 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1988

Paragon Energy Corporation v. United States, 645 F.2d 966 , 227 Ct.Cl. 176, 186, 192 (1981); Tecom, Inc. v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 936-37 (Fed.Cir.1984); Z.A.N. Company v. … Plaintiff cites Gunn-Williams v.