Case law

Washington v. United States

147 F. Supp. 284 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957

Plaintiff then appealed to the Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission, and on October 30, 1953, that Board sustained the decision of the Fourth Region. … Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 , 42 S.Ct. 12 , 66 L.Ed. 140 ; Engelhardt v. United States, 125 Ct.Cl. 603 ; O'Brien v. United States, 124 Ct.Cl. 655 .

Miller v. U.S. Postal Service

231 Ct. Cl. 804 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1982

On September 18, 1978, petitioner filed a motion to reopen and reconsider the feaa decision with the Appeals Review Board (now known as the Office of Appeals, Merit Systems Protection Board). … United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 2-3 (1968). In Dunn v.

Flute

211 Ct. Cl. 317 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1976

With respect to the ex parte receipt and consideration by the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Becords of an advisory opinion of the Air Force Judge Advocate General — the special *318 point in which, the Bar … this court could not grant him any relief; (b) the discussion of the ex parte consideration by the BCMR of the JAG opinion could therefore be considered moot since the result in this court (particularly under United States v.

Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United States

424 F.2d 1370 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

. & Associates v. … Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States, supra. 16 . Of. WRB Corp. v.

Adler Construction Company, a Partnership Constituted of Harold C. Adler and Vera L. Adler, Partners v. The United States

423 F.2d 1362 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

Co. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 801 (1963). … for recovery of unliquidated damages, over which the Board had no jurisdiction (finding 79).

Rothman

219 Ct. Cl. 595 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1979

See Whitecliff, Inc. v. United States, 210 Ct. … Overlook Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 60, 66-68 , 556 F. 2d 500, 502-04 (1977); Ulman v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 308, 318 , 558 F. 2d 1, 6 (1977); Gosman v. United States, 215 Ct.

Strauss v. United States

92 Ct. Cl. 546 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1940

There were nine officers called back to service ahead of plaintiff and plaintiff was not ordered to serve on “retiring or selection boards.” … See Dickerson v. United States, 89 C. Cls. 520 . It now appears that for a part of the period of plaintiff’s claim he was in fact the ninth officer on said list.

Biddle

175 Ct. Cl. 895 · United States Court of Claims · May 2, 1966

. § 1552 authorizing the establishment of Correction Boards to correct military records, citing as authority for its position, Betty Friedman, et al. v. United States, 159 Ct. … Friedman v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 239 , 158 F. Supp. 364 (1958), is inapposite since the claim in that case was founded on disability retirement statutes.

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. United States

74 F. Supp. 558 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1947

It cites a number of cases, including McCoach v. Minehill and Schuylkill Haven, R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 295 ; North Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Rothensies, 45 Fed. Supp. 486; Mahoning Coal R. Co. v. Higgins, 57 Fed. … Cls., 415, 422 ; Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107 ; Wisconsin Central Ry. Co. v. The United States, 70 C. Cls. 203, 231 .

Gregory v. United States

57 F. Supp. 962 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1944

Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States, 97 Ct.Cl. 613, 663-665 . The reports of the Claims Committees of Congress on the act disclose no intention to concede liability. … , until the decision of the Board has become final.”

A. B. Frank Co. v. United States

62 F. Supp. 860 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1945

Sumara v. United States, 129 Fed. (2d) 594; Weiss v. United States, 135 Fed. (2d) 889 ; Morristown Knitting Mills v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 552 556 ; Jaubert Bros. V. … Co. v. United States, supra, p. 113; Interwoven Stocking Co. v. United States, 144 Fed. (2d) 768 ; Root & McBride Co. V. United States, 136 Fed. (2d) 907; Hutsler Bros. V. United States, 33 Fed. Supp. 801; Ney v.

Broome v. United States

170 F. Supp. 613 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959

Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 8 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 827, 829, 830 . Moreover, in each instance Mrs. … V, 163(a).

Walsh

164 Ct. Cl. 745 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 28, 1964

In each case defendant moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that suit was filed more than six years after final action by the proper board (retiring board in these cases) and that the suits were therefore barred by … Cl. 1 , cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932 , and Harper v. United States, 159 Ct.

McMullen v. United States

100 Ct. Cl. 323 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1943

While a retired officer or soldier is, for some purposes., in the military service, United States v. Tyler, 105 U. S. 244 . we think he is not in the service within the meaning of Section 942. … In Blake v. United States, 103 U. S. 227 , and Wallace v. United States, 257 U.

Bradley v. United States

12 Ct. Cl. 578 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1876

He went on board the Dexter Washburn, then in port with a cargo of sugar on board, took the weights and obtained samples, and then waited until the owners had entered their sugar at the custom-house, when he presented his … (Hooper v. Fifty-one Casks of Brandy, Davies R., 370; Brewster v. Gelston, 11 Johns. R., 390; Sawyer v. Steele, 3 Wash., C. Cls. R., 464.)

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States

470 F.2d 513 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

See, also Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 (1965); Houston v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 38, 46 , 297 F. 2d 838, 842 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 815 , reh. denied, 371 U.S. 906 (1962); and Chambers v. … The plaintiff did not comply with the Board’s request. 21.

Carter v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 898 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 25, 1981

United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 401-02 (1976); Brown v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 786 (1981). We now address defendant’s request for a protective order. Defendant cites Carter v. … In yet another case, Carter v. Telectron, Inc., 452 F.Supp. 944 (S.D.

Halifax Engineering, Inc.

221 Ct. Cl. 915 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1979

However, on April 24, 1979, an order of the Wage Appeals Board remanding the matter to the Deputy Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division for a "final decision” shows that plaintiffs damage assessment still awaits a determination … See Leone v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 334, 338 (1974), regarding the importance of this notification.

Keco Industries, Inc.

199 Ct. Cl. 1020 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 17, 1972

The decision in S & E Contractors, Inc. v. … States, 406 U.S. 1 (1972), did not rest on the grounds of lack of judicial jurisdiction, and a contractor-claimant can waive the non-jurisdictional defense that the Government has no standing to contest a decision by a Board

Chase Candy Company v. United States

126 F. Supp. 521 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1954

Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 , 54 S.Ct. 8 , 78 L.Ed. 212 . … As stated by the court in Consolidated Freight Lines v.