Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

0.67s

  • Cravens v. United States

    124 Ct. Cl. 415 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1952

    He thereupon returned to Fort Douglas, Utah, his duty station, on sick leave from Letterman General Hospital, in order to await action upon the Retiring Board Proceedings. … It has been so decided in Germania Iron Co. v. James, 89 F. 811 (CCA 8) ; Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co. v. Krug, 172 F. 2d 282,287 (CADC), reversed on other grounds, 338 U. S. 621 ; American Broadcasting Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Community Services, Incorporated v. The United States

    422 F.2d 1353 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

    For instance, the Tax Court in South Penn Oil Co. v. … The Board determined that there were many times when such words were not necessary. See Colton v. Colton, 127 U.S. 300 , 8 S.Ct. 1164 , 32 L.Ed. 138 (1888).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Alfred Hofmann and Company v. The United States

    329 F.2d 657 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 13, 1964

    Plaintiff cites Fruit Growers Express Co. v. … No Government contract shall contain a provision making final on a question of law the decision of any administrative official, representative, or board.” 5 . United Foundation Corporation v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Washington v. United States

    147 F. Supp. 284 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957

    Plaintiff then appealed to the Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission, and on October 30, 1953, that Board sustained the decision of the Fourth Region. … Eberlein v. United States, 257 U. S. 82 ; Engelhardt v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 603 ; O'Brien v. United States, 124 C. Cls. 655 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Abrahams v. United States

    1 Cl. Ct. 305 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 9, 1982

    Ayres v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 350, 355-58 (1968); Biggs v. United States, 152 Ct.Cl. 545, 546-47 , 287 F.2d 908, 909-10 (1961); Ahearn v. … Baylor v. United States, supra at 357; Albright v. United States, supra at 361.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Keene Corp. v. United States

    12 Cl. Ct. 217 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1987

    United States v. AT & T, 642 F.2d 1285, 1299 (D.C.Cir.1950). … See Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co., 104 F.R.D. 103, 105 (S.D.N.Y.1985). .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Motor Cargo, Inc. v. United States

    124 F. Supp. 370 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1954

    Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 757, 764 ; United States v. Gulf Refining Co., 268 U. S. 542, 546 . … At all times material to this action it had a National Classification Board composed of three members, which Board acted on behalf of the participating motor carriers and issued non-compulsory rulings on classification. b

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jardine Mining Co. v. United States

    115 F. Supp. 174 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1953

    Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. S. 8 . Plaintiff is a mining corporation doing business in the State of Montana. … Calvin Owens v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 1 . Under the circumstances of this case we cannot agree with defendant’s argument.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First National Bank v. United States

    36 F. Supp. 229 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1941

    Bank of Orange v. … In American Cigar Co. v. Commissioner, 66 Fed. (2d) 425, 427, certiorari denied 290 U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Equitable Trust Co. v. United States

    151 F. Supp. 933 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

    This court, in Richard v. United States, 136 C. … Terry v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 958 ; Holland v. United States, 83 C. Cls. 376 . It has also been held that to be paid for active duty an officer must actually perform services calling for such payment. Morrow v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dravo Corp. v. United States

    480 F.2d 1331 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1973

    Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals (The Board) on May 27,1969. In a decision, Eng. … We hold that the plaintiff is right, and the Board in error.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Harding v. United States

    113 F. Supp. 461 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1953

    See Pierce v. Commissioner, 18 B.T.A. 447 ; Siarto v. Commissioner, 62 T.C.M. 3 ; affirmed 6 Cir., 171 F.2d 293 ; Brown v. Commissioner, 92 T.C.M. 1054 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • International Arms & Fuze Co. v. United States

    76 Ct. Cl. 424 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1932

    Perkins-Campbell Co. v. United States, 264 U.S. 213 ; Gem Hammock & Fly Net Co. v. United States, 60 C.Cls. 262; West Leechburg Steel Co. v. United States, 61 C.Cls. 294; Dayton Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. … a correct interpretation appears to have been placed on article V of the rifle grenade contract and the allowance recommended by the New York District Claims Board in respect of the amount to which the plaintiff was entitled

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perini Corporation v. United States

    381 F.2d 403 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

    Board. … Smith Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McDowell v. United States

    24 Cl. Ct. 205 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1991

    Co. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 29, 32 (1989). … Commissioner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kalis Clothing Manufacturing Co. v. United States

    109 F. Supp. 241 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953

    and reliability of the new estimate; (iv) a statement of experienced costs of production hereunder to the extent that they are available at the time or times of the negotiation of the revision of prices hereunder; and (v) … The Board of Contract Appeals, acting for the Secretary of the Army, rendered an opinion on June 14,1948, in which it established a unit price of $15,842. This decision was approved by the Secretary of the Army.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Estates of Armiger v. United States

    339 F.2d 625 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

    E.g., Cooner v. United States, supra; Chapin v. United States, supra. … D’Amico V. P. Tramontana R. B.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. United States

    11 Cl. Ct. 471 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1987

    Brown Creek, Little Brown Creek, and Mackeys Creek are streams that run into the east fork of the Tombigbee River north of the Cooper farm. … In Murray v.

    Reversed on other grounds by J.R. Cooper v. The United States, 827 F.2d 762 (1987)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States

    13 Cl. Ct. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 1, 1987

    She was advised of her right to appeal her removal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). … Plaintiff appealed the MSPB’s final decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which affirmed, without opinion, the board’s decision on March 12, 1982. Harris v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pine Products Corp. v. United States

    36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,823 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1990

    See Banks v. … Adams Veneer Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.