Case law

Carlin

546 F.2d 430 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1976

“The statutory authority creating boards for the correction of military records is 10 U.S.C. §1552 (1970). … “This court has recognized that the Secretary may overrule findings of the Board when they.are not justified by the record upon which they are made. See Proper v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 511 , 154 F.

Gimbel Bros. v. United States

535 F.2d 14 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1976

In Commissioner v. … In Rosenfield v. United States, 156 F. Supp. 780 (E.D.

L. L. Hall Construction Company v. The United States

379 F.2d 559 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1966

Plaintiff appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals which affirmed that the board was without authority to adjust the contract price to compensate for damages due to a delay. … Co. v.

Twin Disc, Inc. v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 713 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 27, 1986

Browne. … Perry Brown. (Brown Tr. W.-2120-21).

Orleans Dredging Co. v. United States

89 Ct. Cl. 170 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1938

The order to remove baffle boards from the spillways was not obeyed by the contractor. … Lytle-Brown, for the purpose of adjusting disputes that had arisenj between them.

Crosthwaite v. United States

30 Ct. Cl. 300 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 22, 1895

It has been regarded as settled since the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Saunders ( 120 U. S. … the department neglects to appoint such board, the contractor may bring his action and recover for his work.

Miller v. United States

49 Ct. Cl. 276 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1914

of officers was, by approval of the Secretary of the Navy, appointed and convened for the purpose of ascertaining the facts in relation thereto, and this board estimated the damage by reason of such delay to the claimant … The case of Cotton v. United States, 38 C. Cls., 536 , is almost identical with this.

Frerichs v. United States

21 Ct. Cl. 16 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1886

In Edward's, lessee, v. … This opinion is again approved in' United States v. Pugh ( 99 U. S.

Lamport Manufacturing Supply Co. v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 579 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1928

Shanhouse v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 840 ; Brody v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 538 , decided February 20, 1928; and Hummel, trustee, v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 489, 494 . … Through these boards the sales of the property were made in different localities.

McClure v. United States

19 Ct. Cl. 173 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1884

, and the department neglects to appoint such a board, the contractor is bound to wait only a reasonable time, and may then bring his action to recover for his work.” … (United States v. Cook., 19 Wall., 591 ; Spencer’s Case, 10 C. Cls. R., p. 255.)

Horace Ray Jackson v. The United States

428 F.2d 844 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

Swaaley v. United States, 376 F.2d 857 , 180 Ct.Cl. 1 (1967). Pickering v. … Jacobowitz v. United States, 424 F.2d 555 , 191 Ct.Cl. 444 (decided April 17, 1970). Plaintiff argues that since Mr.

Edward Levy Metals, Inc.

199 Ct. Cl. 1019 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 17, 1972

the General Accounting Office’s referring of plaintiff to the courts for redress — constituted an effective waiver of the Government’s contractual right to have the propriety of a default termination reviewed *1020 by the Board … See Nager Electric Co. v. United States, 184 Ct. Cl. 390 , 396 F. 2d 977 (1968); Air-A-Plane Corp. v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 269, 282 , 408 F. 2d 1030, 1037 (1969); Hegeman-Harris & Co. v. United States, 194 Ct.

Pharr v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 445 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1926

The petition sets forth the making of four contracts involving the construction of ships for the Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation. … Hawkins v. United States, 96 U. S. 689 ; Klebe v. United States, 263 U. S. 188, 192 . The plaintiff’s contention is decidedly unique.

Chas. H. Tompkins Co. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,293 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1982

Breitbeck v. United States, 205 Ct. … The statute also authorizes National Trust to adopt a constitution and bylaws, and provides for a Board of Trustees. Id.

Abbott

212 Ct. Cl. 562 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1976

Plaintiffs are Air Safety Investigators employed by the Bureau of Safety of the Civil Aeronautics Board and the successor to its functions, the National Transportation Safety Board. … “An additional area of ambiguity concerns whether the record and findings of fact in Griggs v. United States, Ct. Cl. No. 336-65 (1967) should apply to the instant case.

Morton

546 F.2d 432 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1976

“Upon consideration thereof, the court concludes that in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976) and Brown v.

Alexander v. United States

37 Ct. Cl. 33 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1901

Antoine Fuette, and a prize crew was put on board, but on the following da}*- the master succeeded in overpowering the prize crew and recaptured the vessel and took her into the island and port of Tortola, one of the Virgin … (Vattel’s Law of Nations, Book III, 339 et seq.; Barker v. Blakes, 9 East Rep., 283; 1 Chitty’s Commercial Law, 482-489; The Ship Maria, 1 C. Rob. Rep., 340 ; The Ship Mentor, 1 Edwards’s Rep., 208.)

Menick v. United States

184 Ct. Cl. 756 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968

Morelli v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 818 (1966); Angrisani v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 439 (1965). … Angrisani v. United States, supra at 444; Alpert v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 810 (1963).

H. L. Yoh Co. v. United States

153 Ct. Cl. 104 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961

In Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States, 138 Ct. … In other cases, Ruff v. United States, 96 Ct. Cl. 148 (1942); Virginia Engineering Co ., Inc., v. United States, 101 Ct. Cl. 516 (1944); Loftis v. United States, 110 Ct.

Spence v. United States

156 F. Supp. 556 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1957

Myers v. … Hessert v. Commissioner, 6 T.C.M. 1190 (1947) and Arthur C. Ruge v. Commissioner, 26 T.C. 138 (1956), both of which do stand for the proposition for which cited.